Remarkably high and accelerating failure rate of a widely used implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: A large-scale manufacturer-independent multicenter study with long accurate follow-up

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart Rhythm O2 Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.010
Erik F.J. Oosterwerff MD , Dominic A.M.J. Theuns MD, PhD , Alexander H. Maass MD, PhD , Lieselot van Erven MD, PhD
{"title":"Remarkably high and accelerating failure rate of a widely used implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: A large-scale manufacturer-independent multicenter study with long accurate follow-up","authors":"Erik F.J. Oosterwerff MD ,&nbsp;Dominic A.M.J. Theuns MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alexander H. Maass MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lieselot van Erven MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A high annual failure rate of the Linox family defibrillator lead was reported in various small single-center studies. No independent multicenter long-term performance information exists for this lead.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our aim was to assess the longevity of the Linox family leads and to evaluate clinical variables and adverse events associated with failure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This 4-center study included adults &gt;18 years of age who received Linox family leads for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. From November 2006 to November 2016, a total of 3993 high-voltage leads of the Linox family were implanted and followed up on.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The absolute failure rate was 10.6% (dwell time to lead failure of 6.3 ± 3.4 years). Multivariate analysis confirmed younger age (for every 5 years younger than 65 years) (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.14, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and subclavian access (hazard ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.18–1.81, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) as independent risk factors for lead failure. Patients frequently presented themselves with inappropriate shocks (20% in patients with lead failure) due to detection of nonphysiologic high-rate signals/noise.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This is the largest physician-driven multicenter study on the very long-term performance of Linox family leads. Our data report a remarkably high failure rate of these leads. Our findings have significant implications for the management of patients. Monitoring by remote care should be available for all active Linox family leads.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"5 9","pages":"Pages 614-622"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002290/pdfft?md5=7b9d531350602dfa6f590ba3f98bd4a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501824002290-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824002290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A high annual failure rate of the Linox family defibrillator lead was reported in various small single-center studies. No independent multicenter long-term performance information exists for this lead.

Objective

Our aim was to assess the longevity of the Linox family leads and to evaluate clinical variables and adverse events associated with failure.

Methods

This 4-center study included adults >18 years of age who received Linox family leads for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. From November 2006 to November 2016, a total of 3993 high-voltage leads of the Linox family were implanted and followed up on.

Results

The absolute failure rate was 10.6% (dwell time to lead failure of 6.3 ± 3.4 years). Multivariate analysis confirmed younger age (for every 5 years younger than 65 years) (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.14, P < .001) and subclavian access (hazard ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.18–1.81, P < .001) as independent risk factors for lead failure. Patients frequently presented themselves with inappropriate shocks (20% in patients with lead failure) due to detection of nonphysiologic high-rate signals/noise.

Conclusion

This is the largest physician-driven multicenter study on the very long-term performance of Linox family leads. Our data report a remarkably high failure rate of these leads. Our findings have significant implications for the management of patients. Monitoring by remote care should be available for all active Linox family leads.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种广泛使用的植入式心律转复除颤器引线的显著且加速的高故障率 一项长期精确随访的大规模制造商独立多中心研究
背景据各种小型单中心研究报告,Linox 系列除颤器导联线的年故障率很高。我们的目的是评估 Linox 系列导联的使用寿命,并评估与失效相关的临床变量和不良事件。方法这项 4 中心研究纳入了接受 Linox 系列导联用于预防心脏性猝死的 18 岁成人。结果 绝对失败率为 10.6%(导联失败的停留时间为 6.3 ± 3.4 年)。多变量分析证实,年龄较小(65 岁以下每 5 岁)(危险比 1.09,95% 置信区间 1.05-1.14,P < .001)和锁骨下通路(危险比 1.46,95% 置信区间 1.18-1.81,P < .001)是导联失效的独立危险因素。由于检测到非生理的高频率信号/噪声,患者经常出现不适当的电击(占导联失效患者的 20%)。我们的数据显示,这些导联的故障率非常高。我们的研究结果对患者的管理具有重要意义。所有使用中的 Linox 系列导联均应接受远程护理监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Needle-free atrial transseptal access: A safe and reproducible alternative for left atrial catheterization Differences in clinical significance of atrial tachyarrhythmias in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation vs Brugada syndrome: A multicenter study Temporal changes in device-derived daily activity related to ventricular arrhythmias from the CERTITUDE registry Ventricular arrhythmias after atrial fibrillation electrical cardioversion: A multicenter study Ventricular tachycardia: Focal pulsed field electroporation as a rescue therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1