{"title":"Design and systematic evaluation of an under-canopy robotic spray system for row crops","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2024.100510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite having made much improvement in sensing, automation, and control, the current broadcast spraying system has several drawbacks, such as uneven coverage, excessive chemical use, and deviation from recommended dosage. Typically, farmers use large self-propelled sprayers to spray the entire field without knowledge of spatial pest severity, potentially resulting in an unintentional application. However, application errors and the extent of chemical use can be optimized by utilizing an intelligent site-specific decision-based sprayer to control pests more efficiently. Hence, the initial project goal was to design a robotic liquid application system for row crops (e.g., sorghum and corn) and validate sprayer system performance. The critical design considerations for the spray application system were modularity; the ability to be mounted on an autonomous platform to go within 76.2-cm spaced crops; spray on either side of the crop row using spray booms; onboard hardware and software for control and data acquisition; and record as-applied data. A system with desired design requirements was built and individual sub-systems were tested under simulated lab scenarios to quantify the response time and accuracy of the spray system. The results showed that the sprayer could maintain an average system pressure within ±5% of the target under different duty cycles for each of the six nozzles. At 40% duty cycle, the nozzle pressure settling time at an error margin of ±5% from the mean was 13 ms, 20 ms, and 19 ms, for one, three, and six nozzles, respectively. Also, no substantial pressure difference was observed between nozzles installed at different heights in two different booms. Therefore, this application system could be a viable solution for autonomous platforms to site-specifically apply pesticides only on critically infested plants, has the potential to decrease the overall input costs on chemicals and reduce the negative environmental impacts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001151/pdfft?md5=eff1f46e0367a7d26719e68428d9557c&pid=1-s2.0-S2772375524001151-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite having made much improvement in sensing, automation, and control, the current broadcast spraying system has several drawbacks, such as uneven coverage, excessive chemical use, and deviation from recommended dosage. Typically, farmers use large self-propelled sprayers to spray the entire field without knowledge of spatial pest severity, potentially resulting in an unintentional application. However, application errors and the extent of chemical use can be optimized by utilizing an intelligent site-specific decision-based sprayer to control pests more efficiently. Hence, the initial project goal was to design a robotic liquid application system for row crops (e.g., sorghum and corn) and validate sprayer system performance. The critical design considerations for the spray application system were modularity; the ability to be mounted on an autonomous platform to go within 76.2-cm spaced crops; spray on either side of the crop row using spray booms; onboard hardware and software for control and data acquisition; and record as-applied data. A system with desired design requirements was built and individual sub-systems were tested under simulated lab scenarios to quantify the response time and accuracy of the spray system. The results showed that the sprayer could maintain an average system pressure within ±5% of the target under different duty cycles for each of the six nozzles. At 40% duty cycle, the nozzle pressure settling time at an error margin of ±5% from the mean was 13 ms, 20 ms, and 19 ms, for one, three, and six nozzles, respectively. Also, no substantial pressure difference was observed between nozzles installed at different heights in two different booms. Therefore, this application system could be a viable solution for autonomous platforms to site-specifically apply pesticides only on critically infested plants, has the potential to decrease the overall input costs on chemicals and reduce the negative environmental impacts.