Rethinking the traditional American lawn: Perspectives of U.S. households in a nationwide survey

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128460
{"title":"Rethinking the traditional American lawn: Perspectives of U.S. households in a nationwide survey","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As households are increasingly aware that traditional lawns of a grass monoculture have environmental and biodiversity drawbacks, a movement has formed to advocate for alternative lawns. An example is the No Mow May movement, where households do not mow their lawns in May and allow dicots to grow and flower. The purpose of this study is to assess the willingness of U.S. households to join the No Mow May movement, and the extent to which they desire an alternative to the traditional lawn. A total of 908 U.S. households who actively maintain a lawn completed an online survey in May of 2023. When presented with information about the No Mow May movement, 56 % indicated they would participate if some of their neighbors did also. A variety of traditional and alternative lawn illustrations were then provided, where subjects were asked to rate the desirability of each. Most respondents preferred the traditional lawn, even if they looked upon alternatives favorably, while 15–20 percent favored an alternative lawn. These results suggest conventional lawns are still the preferred lawn, but alternatives lawns may become increasingly popular over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724002589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As households are increasingly aware that traditional lawns of a grass monoculture have environmental and biodiversity drawbacks, a movement has formed to advocate for alternative lawns. An example is the No Mow May movement, where households do not mow their lawns in May and allow dicots to grow and flower. The purpose of this study is to assess the willingness of U.S. households to join the No Mow May movement, and the extent to which they desire an alternative to the traditional lawn. A total of 908 U.S. households who actively maintain a lawn completed an online survey in May of 2023. When presented with information about the No Mow May movement, 56 % indicated they would participate if some of their neighbors did also. A variety of traditional and alternative lawn illustrations were then provided, where subjects were asked to rate the desirability of each. Most respondents preferred the traditional lawn, even if they looked upon alternatives favorably, while 15–20 percent favored an alternative lawn. These results suggest conventional lawns are still the preferred lawn, but alternatives lawns may become increasingly popular over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反思传统的美国草坪:全国性调查中美国家庭的观点
随着越来越多的家庭意识到传统的单一草坪在环境和生物多样性方面的弊端,一场倡导替代草坪的运动已经形成。例如,"五月不修剪"(No Mow May)运动,即家庭在五月不修剪草坪,让双子叶植物生长和开花。本研究的目的是评估美国家庭加入五月不修剪运动的意愿,以及他们对传统草坪替代品的渴望程度。2023 年 5 月,共有 908 个积极维护草坪的美国家庭完成了在线调查。当了解到 "五月不修剪 "运动的相关信息时,56% 的人表示,如果他们的邻居也参与这项运动,他们也会参与。随后,调查人员提供了各种传统草坪和替代草坪的插图,要求受访者对每种草坪的可取性进行评分。大多数受访者倾向于传统草坪,即使他们对替代草坪也有好感,而 15-20% 的受访者则倾向于替代草坪。这些结果表明,传统草坪仍是人们的首选,但随着时间的推移,替代草坪可能会越来越受欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
期刊最新文献
Design knowledge of urban agriculture providing ecosystem services. A systematic literature review Predicting the impact of integrated audio-visual environments on perceived restorative benefits across different park types: A field study based on seven parks in Hangzhou, China Larger shrubs can maintain high infiltration and evapotranspiration rates in experimental biofiltration systems impacted by high sediment loads Microhabitat coverage influences avian species composition more than habitat heterogeneity in Hong Kong urban parks The audio-visual incongruency asymmetry. Natural sounds in an urban visual setting are more relaxing than urban sounds in visual nature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1