{"title":"Familial Hypercholesterolemia Diagnosis and Management: Insights from the NIH Precision Medicine Initiative All of Us Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Synopsis</h3><p>Limited data exist regarding familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) diagnosis and treatment in diverse populations.</p></div><div><h3>Objective/Purpose</h3><p>We sought to assess patient characteristics and current treatment patterns among individuals with FH and/or elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in a diverse real-world cohort within the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We examined data from the NIH Precision Medicine Initiative All of Us Research Program, a cross-sectional study beginning in 2015 inclusive of historically underrepresented groups. Among participants with >1 LDL-C measurement, we examined lipid-lowering medication utilization and treatment patterns among participants with and without FH diagnosis stratified by LDL-C. We additionally examined whether sex differences existed in treatment and diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 369,483 All of Us participants age ≥18 years, our study sample included 113,153 individuals who had at least one LDL-C measurement. Of these, 4018 (3.5%) had LDL-C ≥160 mg/dL, 733 (0.26%) had LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, and 434 were diagnosed with FH (0.37%). Statin usage was found to be higher among men compared to women both in those with FH (84% vs. 70.3%, p=0.002) and without FH (54.2% vs. 39.2%, p<0.001) irrespective of LDL-C measures. Women tended to have higher mean LDL-C levels compared to men (130.9 mg/dL vs. 105.8 mg/dL, p<0.001 in those with FH and 106.9 mg/dL vs. 98.8 mg/dL p<0.001 in those without FH). Participants with FH were also more likely to be on statin therapy (75.2% vs 44.8%, p-value <0.001) with 18.4% on two or more types of lipid-lowering agents. Despite this, a higher percentage of FH participants had a history of >1 major ASCVD event (19.4% vs 10.7%, p-value <0.001), and exhibited higher mean LDL-C levels (121.9 mg/dL vs 103.9 mg/dL) compared to non-FH participants. Notably, only 30.5% of FH participants achieved the recommended LDL-C<100 mg/dL compared to 45.7% of those without FH (p-value<0.001). Furthermore, a majority (60.6%) of those already diagnosed with FH had LDL-C <130 mg/dL, including those not taking a lipid-lowering drug (Figure 1), questioning whether FH is being incorrectly diagnosed in some patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights the under and possible inappropriate diagnosis of FH and inadequate treatment of those diagnosed with FH among a real-world population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933287424001132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Synopsis
Limited data exist regarding familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) diagnosis and treatment in diverse populations.
Objective/Purpose
We sought to assess patient characteristics and current treatment patterns among individuals with FH and/or elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in a diverse real-world cohort within the United States.
Methods
We examined data from the NIH Precision Medicine Initiative All of Us Research Program, a cross-sectional study beginning in 2015 inclusive of historically underrepresented groups. Among participants with >1 LDL-C measurement, we examined lipid-lowering medication utilization and treatment patterns among participants with and without FH diagnosis stratified by LDL-C. We additionally examined whether sex differences existed in treatment and diagnosis.
Results
Among 369,483 All of Us participants age ≥18 years, our study sample included 113,153 individuals who had at least one LDL-C measurement. Of these, 4018 (3.5%) had LDL-C ≥160 mg/dL, 733 (0.26%) had LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, and 434 were diagnosed with FH (0.37%). Statin usage was found to be higher among men compared to women both in those with FH (84% vs. 70.3%, p=0.002) and without FH (54.2% vs. 39.2%, p<0.001) irrespective of LDL-C measures. Women tended to have higher mean LDL-C levels compared to men (130.9 mg/dL vs. 105.8 mg/dL, p<0.001 in those with FH and 106.9 mg/dL vs. 98.8 mg/dL p<0.001 in those without FH). Participants with FH were also more likely to be on statin therapy (75.2% vs 44.8%, p-value <0.001) with 18.4% on two or more types of lipid-lowering agents. Despite this, a higher percentage of FH participants had a history of >1 major ASCVD event (19.4% vs 10.7%, p-value <0.001), and exhibited higher mean LDL-C levels (121.9 mg/dL vs 103.9 mg/dL) compared to non-FH participants. Notably, only 30.5% of FH participants achieved the recommended LDL-C<100 mg/dL compared to 45.7% of those without FH (p-value<0.001). Furthermore, a majority (60.6%) of those already diagnosed with FH had LDL-C <130 mg/dL, including those not taking a lipid-lowering drug (Figure 1), questioning whether FH is being incorrectly diagnosed in some patients.
Conclusions
This study highlights the under and possible inappropriate diagnosis of FH and inadequate treatment of those diagnosed with FH among a real-world population.
期刊介绍:
Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. While preference is given to material of immediate practical concern, the science that underpins lipidology is forwarded by expert contributors so that evidence-based approaches to reducing cardiovascular and coronary heart disease can be made immediately available to our readers. Sections of the Journal will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.