Journal of clinical lipidology最新文献

Background: The present study was performed to determine the association between changes in the HDL-C concentration and incident CVD.

Methods: Time-dependent Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association between changes in the HDL-C concentration and the risk of incident CVD. Participants were followed up from 2015 to 2021.

Results: In total, 24,123 participants with a median follow-up of 4.26 years were analyzed, and the mean age of the cohort was 56.24 years, 57.8 % were female, 24.3 % were current smokers, and 12.8 % had a history of alcohol use. Low, normal, and high HDL-C was defined as <40, 40-80, and >80 mg/dL, respectively. The average time for the two HDL-C measurements was 2.8 years,compared with participants whose HDL-C was maintained at a normal level, the risk of CVD was higher in those whose HDL-C changed to a low level, remained unchanged at a low level(HR, 1.24; 95 % CI, 1.01-1.40,P < 0.001), similarly, the risk of CVD was higher in those whose HDL-C changed from very high level to normal level(HR, 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.67-0.99,P = 0.039). Also compared with participants whose HDL-C was maintained at a normal level, the risk of CVD was lower in those whose HDL-C increased from low to normal and high(HR, 0.80; 95 % CI, 0.66-0.98,P = 0.029).

Conclusions: Participants whose HDL-C changed to a low level and whose low HDL-C level was maintained had a higher risk of CVD, whereas participants whose HDL-C changed from low to high had a lower risk of CVD.

Background: Patients suffering from sitosterolemia with ABCG5/8 mutation typically present with early-onset or rapidly progressive atherosclerosis. Their kindreds with partial genetic deficiencies of ABCG5/8 are often considered healthy. However, discerning sitosterolemia from its familial kindreds and hyperlipidemia subjects has remained challenging.

Methods: Here we retrospectively recruited seven families including 8 individuals diagnosed with sitosterolemia subjects, and 14 kindreds carrying single gene mutations. Additionally, 17 individuals with hyperlipidemia and 130 healthy controls served as positive and negative controls, respectively. A total of 6 phytosterols combined with cholesterol absorption indices (including sitosterol, campesterol, stigmasterol, and cholestanol) and cholesterol synthesis markers (desmosterol and 7-dehydrocholesterol), was compared across the aforementioned four groups.

Results: As expected, the sitosterolemia subjects with double mutations demonstrated significantly elevated levels of sitosterol and other cholesterol absorption indices. Meanwhile, sitosterolemia kindreds with single gene mutation showed a similar pattern of activated cholesterol-absorption ability to the hyperlipidemia group, but not as high as the double mutation group. Notably, the cholesterol-synthesis enzyme 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase displayed an increase in the hyperlipidemia group but a decrease in the sitosterolemia kindred group, suggesting a potential discriminative role of 7-dehydrocholesterol in distinguishing between these two groups. The combination of phytosterols was more valuable than clinical lipid index for sitosterolemia diagnosis.

Conclusion: Our study revealed mild disruptions of cholesterol absorption capacities in sitosterolemia kindreds with single mutations. Furthermore, the combination of 6 phytosterols proved effective in distinguishing between sitosterolemia, its single mutation carriers, and hyperlipidemia patients.

Background: Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a monogenic disorder that causes high levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Cascade testing, where relatives of known individuals with FH ('index') are genetically tested, is effective and cost-effective, but implementation in the UK varies.

Objective: This study aims to provide evidence on current UK FH cascade yields and to identify common obstacles cascade services face and individual- and service-level predictors of success.

Methods: Electronic health records from 875 index families and 5,958 linked relatives in the UK's Welsh and Wessex FH services (2019) were used to explore causes for non-testing and to estimate testing rates, detection yields, and how relative characteristics and contact methods relate to the probability of relatives being tested (using logistic regression).

Results: In Wales (Wessex), families included 7.35 (7.01) members on average, with 2.41 (1.66) relatives tested and 1.35 (0.96) diagnosed with FH per index. Cascade testing is limited by individualised circumstances (too young, not at-risk, etc.) and FH services' reach, with approximately one in four relatives out-of-area. In Wales, first-degree relatives (odds ratio (OR):1.55 [95 % confidence interval (CI):1.28,1.88]) and directly contacted relatives (OR:2.11 [CI:1.66,2.69]) were more likely to be tested. In Wales and Wessex, women were more likely to be tested than men (ORs:1.53 [CI:1.28,1.85] and 1.74 [CI:1.32,2.27]).

Conclusion: In Wales and Wessex less than a third of relatives of an index are tested for FH. Improvements are likely possible by integrating geographically dispersed families into cascade testing, services directly contacting relatives where possible, and finding new ways to encourage participation, particularly amongst men.

Background: Olpasiran and pelacarsen are gene-silencing therapies that lower lipoprotein(a). Cardiovascular outcome trials are ongoing. Mendelian randomisation studies estimated clinical benefits from lipoprotein(a) lowering.

Objective: Our study estimated prices at which olpasiran and pelacarsen, in addition to standard-of-care, would be deemed cost-effective in reducing risk of recurrent coronary heart disease (CHD) events in the Australian healthcare system.

Methods: We developed a decision tree and lifetime Markov model. For olpasiran, participants had CHD and lipoprotein(a) 260 nmol/L at baseline and three-monthly injections, profiled on OCEAN(a) Outcomes trial (NCT05581303). Baseline risks of CHD, costs and utilities were obtained from published sources. Clinical trial data were used to derive reductions in lipoprotein(a) from treatment. Mendelian randomisation study data were used to estimate downstream clinical benefits. Annual discounting was 5 %. For pelacarsen, participants had CHD and lipoprotein(a) 226 nmol/L at baseline and one- monthly injections, profiled on Lp(a) HORIZON (NCT04023552) trial.

Results: Olpasiran in addition to standard-of-care saved 0.87 discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per person. Olpasiran in addition to standard-of-care would be cost- effective at annual prices of AU$1867 (AU$467 per dose) at threshold AU$28,000 per QALY. Pelacarsen would be cost-effective at annual prices of AU$984 (AU$82 per dose). For ICER threshold AU$50,000 per QALY, olpasiran and pelacarsen would be cost-effective at annual prices AU$4207 and AU$2464 respectively.

Conclusion: This early health technology assessment model used inclusion criteria from clinical trials. Olpasiran and pelacarsen would be cost-effective if annual treatment prices were AU$1867 and AU$984 respectively, from the Australian healthcare perspective.

Background: Predictors of neoatherosclerosis in patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain unclear.

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency and risk factors of neoatherosclerosis 1-year after the onset of ACS.

Methods: This study investigated 83 patients who underwent PCI for ACS followed by 1-year follow-up optical coherence tomography. The patients were categorized into the neoatherosclerosis (n = 11) and non-neoatherosclerosis groups (n = 72). Baseline characteristics, PCI procedures, medical therapies, and blood tests at 1-year, including detailed lipid profiles, were compared between the two groups.

Results: Diabetes mellitus was more prominent in the neoatherosclerosis than in the non-neoatherosclerosis group (45% vs. 17 %, respectively, p = 0.03). Total cholesterol (171 ± 37 mg/dL vs. 145 ± 25 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.01), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (124 ± 36 mg/dL vs. 94 ± 24 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.01), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (94 ± 36 mg/dL vs. 72 ± 19 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.01), and lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) (70 [19-112] mg/dL vs. 10 [3-25] mg/dL, respectively, p = 0.03) at follow-up were significantly higher in the neoatherosclerosis group. Multivariate analysis revealed that neoatherosclerosis was associated with high serum non-HDL-C (odds ratio [OR]: 1.075; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.011-1.144; p < 0.01) and high serum Lp(a) levels (>30 mg/dL) (OR: 11.0; 95 % CI: 1.492-81.02; p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Poorly controlled non-HDL-C and Lp(a) would be risk factors of neoatherosclerosis in patients 1-year after ACS.

Background: Although direct measurement of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) in blood is possible, there are several formulas for its estimation. The performance and concordance of these formulas have not been evaluated in Colombia.

Objective: To determine the concordance between LDL-C directly measured using the enzymatic technique and existing methods to calculate it.

Methods: Study of diagnostic tests, and concordance. We analyzed complete lipid profile samples, which included direct measurement of LDL-C, from 2014 to 2022 at Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (Bogotá, Colombia). The direct LDL-C measurements were compared with estimations using the DeLong, Sampson, Friedewald, extended Martin/Hopkins, Anandaraja, and Cordova methods. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman plots were employed, conducting subgroup analyses based on triglycerides (TG), and LDL-C levels. Kappa coefficients assessed agreement in LDL-C risk categories according to dyslipidemia guidelines.

Results: A total of 2144 samples were evaluated. The formulas with the best CCC were DeLong (0.971) and Sampson (0.969), with no relevant differences. The extended Martin/Hopkins formula (0.964) and the Friedewald formula (0.964) also performed well. The Anandaraja (0.921) and Cordova (0.881) equations exhibited inferior performance. For all formulas, a decrease in concordance was observed when triglycerides were ≥400 mg/dL or when LDL-C was <100 mg/dL. Most formulas demonstrated optimal agreement when assessed using risk categories according to dyslipidemia guidelines, except for Anandaraja and Cordova.

Conclusions: The DeLong, Sampson, extended Martin/Hopkins, and Friedewald formulas show the best concordance with directly measured LDL-C, so in most cases the results can be considered interchangeable. However, the Anandaraja and Cordova formulas are not recommended.

Background and aims: The monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR), an inflammatory marker, has an unclear relationship with the risk of residual inflammation in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) below 1.4 mmol/L. This study aimed to assess the association between the MLR and cardiovascular and all-cause mortalities in these patients.

Methods: A total of 2747 patients diagnosed with CAD via coronary angiography (CAG) and presenting with LDL-C levels < 1.4 mmol/L were enrolled in this observational study conducted from January 2007 to December 2020. Patients were categorized into four groups based on the MLR quartiles. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models to evaluate the relationship between baseline MLR and cardiovascular and all-cause mortalities.

Results: Among the 2747 participants followed up for a median duration of 6 years, there were 184 cardiovascular and 462 all-cause deaths. Elevated MLR levels were found to be associated with an increased risk of both cardiovascular and all-cause mortalities according to the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between higher MLR and an elevated risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Compared to the older group, with an increase in MLR levels, the younger group showed a higher hazard ratio for cardiovascular death. Similar results were obtained in the single-vessel disease group.

Conclusions: In patients with CAD and LDL-C levels < 1.4 mmol/L, MLR can serve as a risk factor for both cardiovascular and all-cause mortalities owing to the risk of residual inflammation.