Anders Kjellberg, Johan Douglas, Michael T. Pawlik, Adrian Hassler, S. Al-Ezerjawi, Emil Boström, L. Abdel-Halim, Lovisa Liwenborg, Anna-Dora Jonasdottir-Njåstad, Jan Kowalski, S. Catrina, K. Rodriguez-Wallberg, Peter Lindholm
{"title":"Five sessions of Hyperbaric Oxygen for critically ill patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS: a randomised, open label, phase II trial.","authors":"Anders Kjellberg, Johan Douglas, Michael T. Pawlik, Adrian Hassler, S. Al-Ezerjawi, Emil Boström, L. Abdel-Halim, Lovisa Liwenborg, Anna-Dora Jonasdottir-Njåstad, Jan Kowalski, S. Catrina, K. Rodriguez-Wallberg, Peter Lindholm","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4785362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nFew treatment options exist for patients with COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Data on the benefits and harms of hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) for this condition is limited.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo evaluate benefits and harms of HBOT in patients with COVID-19 induced ARDS.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn this open-label trial conducted at three hospitals in Sweden and Germany, patients with moderate to severe ARDS and at least two risk factors for unfavourable outcome, were randomly assigned (1:1) to medical oxygen 100%, 2·4 Atmospheres absolute (ATA), 80 minutes (HBOT) adjuvant to best practice or to best practice alone (Control). Randomisation was stratified by sex and site. The primary endpoint was ICU admission by Day 30.\n\n\nRESULTS\nBetween June 4, 2020, and Dec 1, 2021, 34 subjects were randomised to HBOT (N=18) or Control (N=16). The trial was prematurely terminated for futility. There was no statistically significant difference in ICU admission, 5 (50%) in Control vs 13 (72%) in HBOT. OR 2·54 [95% CI 0·62-10·39], p=0·19.\n\n\nHARMS\n102 adverse events (AEs) were recorded. 16 (94%) subjects in the HBOT group and 14 (93%) in the control group had at least one AE. Three serious adverse events (SAEs), were at least, possibly related to HBOT. All deaths were unlikely related to HBOT.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nHBOT did not reduce ICU admission or mortality in patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS. The trial cannot conclude definitive benefits or harms. Treating COVID-19-induced ARDS with HBOT is feasible with a favourable harms profile.\n\n\nFUNDING\nSwedish Research Council, grant number KBF 2019-00446.","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4785362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Few treatment options exist for patients with COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Data on the benefits and harms of hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) for this condition is limited.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate benefits and harms of HBOT in patients with COVID-19 induced ARDS.
METHODS
In this open-label trial conducted at three hospitals in Sweden and Germany, patients with moderate to severe ARDS and at least two risk factors for unfavourable outcome, were randomly assigned (1:1) to medical oxygen 100%, 2·4 Atmospheres absolute (ATA), 80 minutes (HBOT) adjuvant to best practice or to best practice alone (Control). Randomisation was stratified by sex and site. The primary endpoint was ICU admission by Day 30.
RESULTS
Between June 4, 2020, and Dec 1, 2021, 34 subjects were randomised to HBOT (N=18) or Control (N=16). The trial was prematurely terminated for futility. There was no statistically significant difference in ICU admission, 5 (50%) in Control vs 13 (72%) in HBOT. OR 2·54 [95% CI 0·62-10·39], p=0·19.
HARMS
102 adverse events (AEs) were recorded. 16 (94%) subjects in the HBOT group and 14 (93%) in the control group had at least one AE. Three serious adverse events (SAEs), were at least, possibly related to HBOT. All deaths were unlikely related to HBOT.
CONCLUSIONS
HBOT did not reduce ICU admission or mortality in patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS. The trial cannot conclude definitive benefits or harms. Treating COVID-19-induced ARDS with HBOT is feasible with a favourable harms profile.
FUNDING
Swedish Research Council, grant number KBF 2019-00446.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants.
Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.