Impact of agroforestry intervention on carbon stock and soil quality in mid-hills of Nepal

Menuka Maharjan , Santosh Ayer , Sachin Timilsina , Pramod Ghimire , Sandesh Bhatta , Neeru Thapa , Yajna Prasad Timilsina , Soni Lama , Vijay Kumar Yadav , Chukwuebuka Christopher Okolo
{"title":"Impact of agroforestry intervention on carbon stock and soil quality in mid-hills of Nepal","authors":"Menuka Maharjan ,&nbsp;Santosh Ayer ,&nbsp;Sachin Timilsina ,&nbsp;Pramod Ghimire ,&nbsp;Sandesh Bhatta ,&nbsp;Neeru Thapa ,&nbsp;Yajna Prasad Timilsina ,&nbsp;Soni Lama ,&nbsp;Vijay Kumar Yadav ,&nbsp;Chukwuebuka Christopher Okolo","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Traditionally, planting trees on agricultural land including livestock is a very common practice in the mid-hills of Nepal. Trees on farms fulfill the demand for fuel wood/timber including fodder used to feed the livestock. Animal urine/dung is used as a bio-fertilizer that increases soil fertility. However, very few studies have been conducted on assessing carbon (C) stock and soil quality in agroforestry systems. This study was carried out to estimate the C stock and soil quality in agroforestry and agricultural land in the Kaski district of Nepal. Silvo-horto-agro system and agricultural land were selected from Site 1 (900–1000 m and west) and Site 2 (700–800 m and west). Total C stock was higher in the agroforestry at Site 1 (98.57 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) than agroforestry at Site 2 (64.73 t ha<sup>−1</sup>). Soil organic C, pH, and available potassium were higher in agroforestry than agriculture sites. Total nitrogen was higher in agroforestry than agriculture at Site 1. Available phosphorus was higher in agriculture than agroforestry at Site 1. Soil quality index (SQI) was good (0.8) and fair (0.6) in agroforestry and agriculture at Site 1. SQI was fair (0.6) in agroforestry and poor (0.5) in agriculture at Site 2. Altogether, the application of farmyard manure and vermi-compost including the higher vegetation density contributes to enhancing the soil quality in agroforestry systems. Further research on C stock including various soil quality indices is necessary under various kinds of agroforestry systems for a better understanding of their contribution towards climate change mitigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000388/pdfft?md5=e1b6012a5c4dbfaacf6784493e7d6c40&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006224000388-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, planting trees on agricultural land including livestock is a very common practice in the mid-hills of Nepal. Trees on farms fulfill the demand for fuel wood/timber including fodder used to feed the livestock. Animal urine/dung is used as a bio-fertilizer that increases soil fertility. However, very few studies have been conducted on assessing carbon (C) stock and soil quality in agroforestry systems. This study was carried out to estimate the C stock and soil quality in agroforestry and agricultural land in the Kaski district of Nepal. Silvo-horto-agro system and agricultural land were selected from Site 1 (900–1000 m and west) and Site 2 (700–800 m and west). Total C stock was higher in the agroforestry at Site 1 (98.57 t ha−1) than agroforestry at Site 2 (64.73 t ha−1). Soil organic C, pH, and available potassium were higher in agroforestry than agriculture sites. Total nitrogen was higher in agroforestry than agriculture at Site 1. Available phosphorus was higher in agriculture than agroforestry at Site 1. Soil quality index (SQI) was good (0.8) and fair (0.6) in agroforestry and agriculture at Site 1. SQI was fair (0.6) in agroforestry and poor (0.5) in agriculture at Site 2. Altogether, the application of farmyard manure and vermi-compost including the higher vegetation density contributes to enhancing the soil quality in agroforestry systems. Further research on C stock including various soil quality indices is necessary under various kinds of agroforestry systems for a better understanding of their contribution towards climate change mitigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农林干预对尼泊尔半山地区碳储量和土壤质量的影响
传统上,在包括牲畜在内的农田上植树是尼泊尔半山区非常普遍的做法。农场上的树木满足了对薪材/木材的需求,包括用于喂养牲畜的饲料。牲畜尿液/粪便可用作生物肥料,增加土壤肥力。然而,很少有研究对农林系统中的碳储量和土壤质量进行评估。本研究旨在估算尼泊尔卡斯基地区农林业和农业用地的碳储量和土壤质量。研究选取了 1 号地点(900-1000 米,西面)和 2 号地点(700-800 米,西面)的矽-硼-农林系统和农田。地点 1 的农林业总碳储量(98.57 吨/公顷-1)高于地点 2 的农林业(64.73 吨/公顷-1)。农林业用地的土壤有机碳、pH 值和可用钾均高于农业用地。在 1 号地点,农林业的总氮高于农业。在 1 号地点,农业可用磷高于农林业。在 1 号地点,农林业和农业的土壤质量指数(SQI)分别为好(0.8)和一般(0.6)。在 2 号地点,农林业的土壤质量指数为一般(0.6),农业的土壤质量指数为差(0.5)。总之,施用农家肥和蚯蚓堆肥以及提高植被密度有助于提高农林系统的土壤质量。有必要进一步研究各种农林系统中的碳储量,包括各种土壤质量指标,以更好地了解它们对减缓气候变化的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
期刊最新文献
Heavy metal pollution in farmland soils surrounding mining areas in China and the response of soil microbial communities Integration of indigenous and formal knowledge in the assessment of soil quality performance assessment using multiple factor analysis in Alborz central mountains Medium-term economic impacts of cover crop adoption in Maryland Using MIR and XRF spectroscopy to develop a heavy metal leaching potential model in Irish top soils Erratum regarding missing Conflict of Interest (COI) Statements in previously published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1