An Imaginary Dialogue between Aristotle and Pascal about the Greatness and Nothingness of Man

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY VOPROSY FILOSOFII Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.21146/0042-8744-2024-6-115-123
Marina Grigoreva
{"title":"An Imaginary Dialogue between Aristotle and Pascal about the Greatness and Nothingness of Man","authors":"Marina Grigoreva","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2024-6-115-123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the fact that the time interval separating the lives of Aristotle and Pascal is extremely long, antiquity was for the national genius of France a source of re­newed inspiration, to which memory returns and reason turns. Pascal’s belief that “all human dignity lies in thought” was previously expressed by Aristotle: “the activity of the mind is significant… reason in comparison with man is something divine”, this means that, on the one hand, a reasonable life is natural for a person and makes him a man par excellence, and on the other hand, a rea­sonable life, exalting a person, elevates him to the status of a sage. The article examines the arguments of two thinkers about the nature of reason, expressed in the writings “Nicomachean ethics” and “Thoughts” and developed as a result into teachings that directly affect the problems of being and the search for good. In search of an answer to the question of the highest good, philosophers have proposed different solutions, so it is not surprising that, driven by the desire to achieve genuine happiness, Aristotle and Pascal come to contradictory conclu­sions. According to Pascal, greatness does not consist in following one extreme, but in reaching both and filling the space between them with your presence. The purpose of the study is to recognize a common concept in the differences between Aristotle and Pascal.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-6-115-123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the fact that the time interval separating the lives of Aristotle and Pascal is extremely long, antiquity was for the national genius of France a source of re­newed inspiration, to which memory returns and reason turns. Pascal’s belief that “all human dignity lies in thought” was previously expressed by Aristotle: “the activity of the mind is significant… reason in comparison with man is something divine”, this means that, on the one hand, a reasonable life is natural for a person and makes him a man par excellence, and on the other hand, a rea­sonable life, exalting a person, elevates him to the status of a sage. The article examines the arguments of two thinkers about the nature of reason, expressed in the writings “Nicomachean ethics” and “Thoughts” and developed as a result into teachings that directly affect the problems of being and the search for good. In search of an answer to the question of the highest good, philosophers have proposed different solutions, so it is not surprising that, driven by the desire to achieve genuine happiness, Aristotle and Pascal come to contradictory conclu­sions. According to Pascal, greatness does not consist in following one extreme, but in reaching both and filling the space between them with your presence. The purpose of the study is to recognize a common concept in the differences between Aristotle and Pascal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚里士多德与帕斯卡尔关于人的伟大与虚无的想象对话
尽管亚里士多德和帕斯卡尔的生活相距甚远,但对于法国的民族天才来说,古代是新灵感的源泉,记忆回到古代,理性转向古代。帕斯卡尔认为 "人的尊严全在于思想",亚里士多德也曾表达过这一观点:"思想的活动是重要的......理性与人相比是神圣的东西",这意味着,一方面,合理的生活对一个人来说是自然的,使他成为卓越的人;另一方面,合理的生活使一个人变得崇高,将他提升到圣人的地位。文章研究了两位思想家关于理性本质的论证,他们的论证在《尼各马可伦理学》和《思辨》两部著作中得到了表达,并由此发展成为直接影响存在和求善问题的教义。为了寻找至善问题的答案,哲学家们提出了不同的解决方案,因此,在追求真正幸福的愿望驱使下,亚里士多德和帕斯卡尔得出相互矛盾的结论也就不足为奇了。帕斯卡尔认为,伟大不在于追随一个极端,而在于达到两个极端,并用自己的存在填满两者之间的空间。本研究的目的是在亚里士多德和帕斯卡尔的分歧中认识到一个共同的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
期刊最新文献
The Guardian of the History of Philosophy: On Nelly Motroschilova’s Philosophical Beginnings Maimonides, Gersonides and Crescas on Prophets and Prophecy The Neurological Interpretation of the Myth-ritual Complex: Pro et Contra Worlds of Consciousness in the Context of Multiverse Conceptions Specifics of Expert Activity in Modern Applied Science (Review of Survey Results)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1