Enhancing urban livability: Analyzing Tehran through equitable land use distribution

IF 3.9 2区 社会学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Journal of Urban Management Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jum.2024.06.005
Kimia Ghasemi
{"title":"Enhancing urban livability: Analyzing Tehran through equitable land use distribution","authors":"Kimia Ghasemi","doi":"10.1016/j.jum.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban livability, a concept integral to human settlements, lacks a universally agreed-upon definition. It encompasses various aspects influencing the attractiveness and quality of life in a city. The research adopts an objective evaluation method, focusing on equitable access to urban services. The study aims to address these challenges by examining the livability of Tehran's 22 districts, emphasizing access to essential services. Employing a comprehensive methodology, the research utilizes analytical tools such as Standard Deviational Ellipse analysis (SDE), Average Nearest Neighbor (ANN), and the Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) technique. The spatial distribution analysis of urban land uses in Tehran reveals distinct patterns through Standard Deviational Ellipse analysis. Urban land uses exhibit directional orientations and concentrations, providing valuable insights for urban planning. Average Nearest Neighbor analysis indicates clustered distribution across various land uses, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. The study ranks Tehran's districts based on livability using MABAC technique. District 21 emerges as the most livable, while District 10 faces challenges in service distribution. The findings highlight disparities and call for focused urban planning to enhance overall livability in Tehran, recognizing the importance of equitable access to urban services for a sustainable and cohesive urban environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Management","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 596-608"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2226585624000736","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban livability, a concept integral to human settlements, lacks a universally agreed-upon definition. It encompasses various aspects influencing the attractiveness and quality of life in a city. The research adopts an objective evaluation method, focusing on equitable access to urban services. The study aims to address these challenges by examining the livability of Tehran's 22 districts, emphasizing access to essential services. Employing a comprehensive methodology, the research utilizes analytical tools such as Standard Deviational Ellipse analysis (SDE), Average Nearest Neighbor (ANN), and the Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) technique. The spatial distribution analysis of urban land uses in Tehran reveals distinct patterns through Standard Deviational Ellipse analysis. Urban land uses exhibit directional orientations and concentrations, providing valuable insights for urban planning. Average Nearest Neighbor analysis indicates clustered distribution across various land uses, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. The study ranks Tehran's districts based on livability using MABAC technique. District 21 emerges as the most livable, while District 10 faces challenges in service distribution. The findings highlight disparities and call for focused urban planning to enhance overall livability in Tehran, recognizing the importance of equitable access to urban services for a sustainable and cohesive urban environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高城市宜居性:通过公平的土地利用分布分析德黑兰
城市宜居性是人类住区不可或缺的一个概念,但却缺乏一个普遍认同的定义。它包括影响城市吸引力和生活质量的各个方面。本研究采用客观评价方法,重点关注公平获取城市服务。本研究旨在通过考察德黑兰 22 个区的宜居性来应对这些挑战,重点关注基本服务的获取。研究采用综合方法,利用标准偏差椭圆分析法(SDE)、平均近邻法(ANN)和多属性边界逼近区域比较法(MABAC)等分析工具。通过标准偏差椭圆分析,德黑兰城市土地利用的空间分布分析揭示了独特的模式。城市土地使用呈现出方向性和集中性,为城市规划提供了有价值的见解。平均近邻分析表明了各种土地用途的集群分布,强调了有针对性干预的必要性。研究采用 MABAC 技术,根据宜居程度对德黑兰各区进行了排名。第 21 区成为最宜居的地区,而第 10 区则在服务分布方面面临挑战。研究结果凸显了差异,并呼吁进行有针对性的城市规划,以提高德黑兰的整体宜居性,同时认识到公平获取城市服务对于可持续和有凝聚力的城市环境的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
4.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Urban Management (JUM) is the Official Journal of Zhejiang University and the Chinese Association of Urban Management, an international, peer-reviewed open access journal covering planning, administering, regulating, and governing urban complexity. JUM has its two-fold aims set to integrate the studies across fields in urban planning and management, as well as to provide a more holistic perspective on problem solving. 1) Explore innovative management skills for taming thorny problems that arise with global urbanization 2) Provide a platform to deal with urban affairs whose solutions must be looked at from an interdisciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Revealing the transformation of spatial structure of greater Cairo: Insights from satellite imagery and geospatial metrics The status quo of architecture and its impact on urban management: Christopher Alexander's insights Housing policy and markets in China: Affordability and sustainability Educational inequality in urban settings: A spatial analysis of school distribution and double-shift system challenges – A case study Navigating between private and public: Understanding publicness of public open spaces in private developments in Hong Kong
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1