Diagnostic models to predict structural spinal osteoarthritis on lumbar radiographs in older adults with back pain: Development and internal validation

Mirna Chamoro , Martijn W. Heymans , Edwin H.G. Oei , Sita M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra , Bart W. Koes , Alessandro Chiarotto
{"title":"Diagnostic models to predict structural spinal osteoarthritis on lumbar radiographs in older adults with back pain: Development and internal validation","authors":"Mirna Chamoro ,&nbsp;Martijn W. Heymans ,&nbsp;Edwin H.G. Oei ,&nbsp;Sita M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra ,&nbsp;Bart W. Koes ,&nbsp;Alessandro Chiarotto","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>It is difficult for health care providers to diagnose structural spinal osteoarthritis (OA), because current guidelines recommend against imaging in patients with back pain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and internally validate multivariable diagnostic prediction models based on a set of clinical and demographic features to be used for the diagnosis of structural spinal OA on lumbar radiographs in older patients with back pain.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Three diagnostic prediction models, for structural spinal OA on lumbar radiographs (i.e. multilevel osteophytes, multilevel disc space narrowing (DSN), and both combined), were developed and internally validated in the ‘Back Complaints in Older Adults’ (BACE) cohort (N ​= ​669). Model performance (i.e. overall performance, discrimination and calibration) and clinical utility (i.e. decision curve analysis) were assessed. Internal validation was performed by bootstrapping.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean age of the cohort was 66.9 years (±7.6 years) and 59% were female. All three models included age, gender, back pain duration and duration of spinal morning stiffness as predictors. The combined model additionally included restricted lateral flexion and spinal morning stiffness severity, and exhibited the best model performance (optimism adjusted c-statistic 0.661; good calibration with intercept −0.030 and slope of 0.886) and acceptable clinical utility. The other models showed suboptimal discrimination, good calibration and acceptable decision curves.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All three models for structural spinal OA displayed lesuboptimal discrimination and need improvement. However, these internally validated models have potential to inform primary care clinicians about a patient with risk of having structural spinal OA on lumbar radiographs. External validation before implementation in clinical care is recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913124000736/pdfft?md5=3a73cba299343e579f07295b2868c5d2&pid=1-s2.0-S2665913124000736-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913124000736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

It is difficult for health care providers to diagnose structural spinal osteoarthritis (OA), because current guidelines recommend against imaging in patients with back pain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and internally validate multivariable diagnostic prediction models based on a set of clinical and demographic features to be used for the diagnosis of structural spinal OA on lumbar radiographs in older patients with back pain.

Design

Three diagnostic prediction models, for structural spinal OA on lumbar radiographs (i.e. multilevel osteophytes, multilevel disc space narrowing (DSN), and both combined), were developed and internally validated in the ‘Back Complaints in Older Adults’ (BACE) cohort (N ​= ​669). Model performance (i.e. overall performance, discrimination and calibration) and clinical utility (i.e. decision curve analysis) were assessed. Internal validation was performed by bootstrapping.

Results

Mean age of the cohort was 66.9 years (±7.6 years) and 59% were female. All three models included age, gender, back pain duration and duration of spinal morning stiffness as predictors. The combined model additionally included restricted lateral flexion and spinal morning stiffness severity, and exhibited the best model performance (optimism adjusted c-statistic 0.661; good calibration with intercept −0.030 and slope of 0.886) and acceptable clinical utility. The other models showed suboptimal discrimination, good calibration and acceptable decision curves.

Conclusion

All three models for structural spinal OA displayed lesuboptimal discrimination and need improvement. However, these internally validated models have potential to inform primary care clinicians about a patient with risk of having structural spinal OA on lumbar radiographs. External validation before implementation in clinical care is recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测腰痛老年人腰部 X 光片结构性脊柱骨关节炎的诊断模型:开发和内部验证
目的:医疗服务提供者很难诊断结构性脊柱骨关节炎(OA),因为现行指南建议背痛患者不要进行影像学检查。因此,本研究旨在根据一组临床和人口统计学特征开发多变量诊断预测模型,并对其进行内部验证,以用于诊断老年背痛患者腰部X光片上的结构性脊柱OA。设计针对腰椎X光片上的结构性脊柱OA(即多层次骨质增生、多层次椎间盘间隙狭窄(DSN)以及两者的结合)开发了三个诊断预测模型,并在 "老年人腰痛"(BACE)队列(N = 669)中进行了内部验证。对模型的性能(即总体性能、辨别力和校准)和临床实用性(即决策曲线分析)进行了评估。结果 队列的平均年龄为 66.9 岁(±7.6 岁),59% 为女性。所有三个模型都将年龄、性别、背痛持续时间和脊柱晨僵持续时间作为预测因素。综合模型还包括限制性侧屈和脊柱晨僵严重程度,并显示出最佳的模型性能(优化调整后的 c 统计量为 0.661;校准良好,截距为 -0.030,斜率为 0.886)和可接受的临床实用性。结论 所有三个脊柱结构性 OA 模型都显示出较低的分辨力,需要改进。然而,这些经过内部验证的模型有可能为初级保健临床医生提供信息,使其了解腰椎X光片上有结构性脊柱OA风险的病人。建议在临床护理中使用前进行外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Study protocol for the PICASSO trial: A randomized placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of intraarticular steroid injections and an occupational therapy intervention in painful inflammatory carpometacarpal-1 osteoarthritis Proteomic analysis reveals biomarkers associated with performance-based joint function and patient-reported outcomes in knee osteoarthritis A scoping review of statistical methods to investigate colocalization between genetic associations and microRNA expression in osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1