Materialist Philosophy of Michel Onfray

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY VOPROSY FILOSOFII Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.21146/0042-8744-2024-7-184-192
Ekaterina I. Korostichenko
{"title":"Materialist Philosophy of Michel Onfray","authors":"Ekaterina I. Korostichenko","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2024-7-184-192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the atheological concept of “the most popular French philosopher” Michel Onfray, as well as his criticism of religion. Onfray borrows the term “atheology” from G. Bataille, which he understands as a current of thought that deconstructs theological truths. The philosopher identifies three original tasks of atheology: the deconstruction of monotheism, the demythologization of Judeo-Christianity and Islam, and the deconstruction of theocracy. He implements all these three tasks in one way or another. The article demonstrates that Onfray’s concept of atheology does not represent something radically new or significantly different from the existing tradition of religion critique. Onfray limits himself to the three monotheisms that have the greatest political influence and resolutely condemns almost all aspects of the three religions. We note that in doing so, Onfray simplifies the image of religion, presenting it exclusively in a negative light. Such negativism brings Onfray closer not only to contemporary new atheists, especially C. Hitchens, who believes that “religion poisons everything”, but also to such representatives of French materialism as Holbach and La Mettrie. Onfray’s approach seems abstract because it does not provide a thorough socio-historical explanation of monotheistic religions. It is shown that his criticism of religion is based on a significant philosophical tradition that goes from Democritus, Lucretius, Epicurus, to Freud, Marx, and Nietzsche, and includes French materialists such as Holbach, La Mettrie, Helvetius. His hedonism is more likely to be drawn from the Cyrenaics than from Epicurus. The originality of Onfray’s approach lies in the fact that he incorporates materialism and hedonism into his concept of “philosophy of nature”. Onfray’s positive agenda, although resonant with a number of contemporary issues, is formulated in extremely general terms and is poorly worked out.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-7-184-192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the atheological concept of “the most popular French philosopher” Michel Onfray, as well as his criticism of religion. Onfray borrows the term “atheology” from G. Bataille, which he understands as a current of thought that deconstructs theological truths. The philosopher identifies three original tasks of atheology: the deconstruction of monotheism, the demythologization of Judeo-Christianity and Islam, and the deconstruction of theocracy. He implements all these three tasks in one way or another. The article demonstrates that Onfray’s concept of atheology does not represent something radically new or significantly different from the existing tradition of religion critique. Onfray limits himself to the three monotheisms that have the greatest political influence and resolutely condemns almost all aspects of the three religions. We note that in doing so, Onfray simplifies the image of religion, presenting it exclusively in a negative light. Such negativism brings Onfray closer not only to contemporary new atheists, especially C. Hitchens, who believes that “religion poisons everything”, but also to such representatives of French materialism as Holbach and La Mettrie. Onfray’s approach seems abstract because it does not provide a thorough socio-historical explanation of monotheistic religions. It is shown that his criticism of religion is based on a significant philosophical tradition that goes from Democritus, Lucretius, Epicurus, to Freud, Marx, and Nietzsche, and includes French materialists such as Holbach, La Mettrie, Helvetius. His hedonism is more likely to be drawn from the Cyrenaics than from Epicurus. The originality of Onfray’s approach lies in the fact that he incorporates materialism and hedonism into his concept of “philosophy of nature”. Onfray’s positive agenda, although resonant with a number of contemporary issues, is formulated in extremely general terms and is poorly worked out.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
米歇尔-翁弗雷的唯物主义哲学
文章探讨了 "法国最受欢迎的哲学家 "米歇尔-翁弗雷的无神论概念及其对宗教的批判。翁弗雷从巴塔耶那里借用了 "无神论 "一词,将其理解为一种解构神学真理的思潮。这位哲学家指出了无神论的三项原始任务:解构一神论、将犹太教-基督教和伊斯兰教非神学化以及解构神权。他以这样或那样的方式实现了所有这三项任务。文章表明,翁弗雷的无神论概念并不代表一种全新的或与现有宗教批判传统明显不同的东西。翁弗雷将自己的视野局限于政治影响力最大的三个一神教,并坚决谴责这三个宗教的几乎所有方面。我们注意到,昂弗雷这样做简化了宗教的形象,完全从负面的角度来描述宗教。这种否定论不仅使昂弗莱更接近当代新无神论者,尤其是认为 "宗教毒害一切 "的希钦斯,而且更接近法国唯物主义的代表人物霍尔巴赫和拉梅特里。昂弗雷的方法似乎很抽象,因为它没有对一神教做出透彻的社会历史解释。事实证明,他对宗教的批判是建立在一个重要的哲学传统之上的,这个传统从德谟克利特、卢克莱修、伊壁鸠鲁到弗洛伊德、马克思和尼采,还包括霍尔巴赫、拉梅特里、赫尔维蒂乌斯等法国唯物主义者。他的享乐主义与其说是来自伊壁鸠鲁,不如说是来自昔兰尼加派。翁弗莱方法的独创性在于,他将唯物主义和享乐主义纳入了他的 "自然哲学 "概念。翁弗莱的积极议程虽然与一些当代问题产生了共鸣,但其措辞极为笼统,而且没有经过深思熟虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
期刊最新文献
The Guardian of the History of Philosophy: On Nelly Motroschilova’s Philosophical Beginnings Maimonides, Gersonides and Crescas on Prophets and Prophecy The Neurological Interpretation of the Myth-ritual Complex: Pro et Contra Worlds of Consciousness in the Context of Multiverse Conceptions Specifics of Expert Activity in Modern Applied Science (Review of Survey Results)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1