{"title":"†High Rates of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Multivessel Disease in the First Year Post-Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2024.04.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Funding</h3><p>This study was sponsored by CSL Behring and performed in collaboration with the Baim Institute.</p></div><div><h3>Background/Synopsis</h3><p>Patients who survive an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are at a heightened risk of further major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), particularly in the first few months following an AMI. Multivessel disease (MVD) is known to further exacerbate the risk of MACE. The elevated risk in this early post-AMI period is not addressed by current secondary preventative therapies.</p></div><div><h3>Objective/Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the impact of MVD on clinical and patient-centered outcomes in the first year post-AMI, in the context of the current treatment landscape.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this systematic literature review, relevant articles published between March 2019 and July 2022 were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane databases, and cardiovascular (CV) and health outcomes conferences. Articles reporting on pre-specified clinical or patient-centered outcomes in post-AMI patients with MVD at timepoints within 1 year were eligible for inclusion. Studies that included patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock were excluded from this review.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clinical outcomes were reported in five randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and 25 observational studies across 32 articles. Patient-centered outcomes were reported in one RCT across two articles. The definition of MVD varied across the studies; however, it was typically characterized by ≥50% stenosis in ≥1 non-infarct-related coronary artery. Of the individual MACE endpoints extracted for this review (all-cause mortality, CV mortality, AMI, stroke), all-cause mortality and AMI were most frequently reported. Although rates of individual MACE endpoints were variable (Table), likely due to heterogeneity in study populations and interventions, a trend was identified; MACE rates at 1-year post-AMI were typically not substantially higher than those reported at earlier timepoints. EQ-5D scores, indicative of quality of life (QoL), increased marginally from baseline to 1 year following treatment, indicating minimal improvements in QoL. Nevertheless, EQ-5D was only reported in one RCT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MVD is associated with high rates of MACE early after AMI that persist at 1 year. Novel therapies that address CV risk in the early period post-AMI may support improved CV outcomes among patients with MVD. Further data on patient-centered outcomes are warranted to determine the impact of post-AMI treatment options on QoL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933287424000941","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study Funding
This study was sponsored by CSL Behring and performed in collaboration with the Baim Institute.
Background/Synopsis
Patients who survive an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are at a heightened risk of further major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), particularly in the first few months following an AMI. Multivessel disease (MVD) is known to further exacerbate the risk of MACE. The elevated risk in this early post-AMI period is not addressed by current secondary preventative therapies.
Objective/Purpose
To evaluate the impact of MVD on clinical and patient-centered outcomes in the first year post-AMI, in the context of the current treatment landscape.
Methods
In this systematic literature review, relevant articles published between March 2019 and July 2022 were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane databases, and cardiovascular (CV) and health outcomes conferences. Articles reporting on pre-specified clinical or patient-centered outcomes in post-AMI patients with MVD at timepoints within 1 year were eligible for inclusion. Studies that included patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock were excluded from this review.
Results
Clinical outcomes were reported in five randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and 25 observational studies across 32 articles. Patient-centered outcomes were reported in one RCT across two articles. The definition of MVD varied across the studies; however, it was typically characterized by ≥50% stenosis in ≥1 non-infarct-related coronary artery. Of the individual MACE endpoints extracted for this review (all-cause mortality, CV mortality, AMI, stroke), all-cause mortality and AMI were most frequently reported. Although rates of individual MACE endpoints were variable (Table), likely due to heterogeneity in study populations and interventions, a trend was identified; MACE rates at 1-year post-AMI were typically not substantially higher than those reported at earlier timepoints. EQ-5D scores, indicative of quality of life (QoL), increased marginally from baseline to 1 year following treatment, indicating minimal improvements in QoL. Nevertheless, EQ-5D was only reported in one RCT.
Conclusions
MVD is associated with high rates of MACE early after AMI that persist at 1 year. Novel therapies that address CV risk in the early period post-AMI may support improved CV outcomes among patients with MVD. Further data on patient-centered outcomes are warranted to determine the impact of post-AMI treatment options on QoL.
期刊介绍:
Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. While preference is given to material of immediate practical concern, the science that underpins lipidology is forwarded by expert contributors so that evidence-based approaches to reducing cardiovascular and coronary heart disease can be made immediately available to our readers. Sections of the Journal will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.