Acceptance and commitment therapy: What the history of ACT and the first 1,000 randomized controlled trials reveal

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100809
Steven C. Hayes , Grant A. King
{"title":"Acceptance and commitment therapy: What the history of ACT and the first 1,000 randomized controlled trials reveal","authors":"Steven C. Hayes ,&nbsp;Grant A. King","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Contextual Behavioral Science (CBS) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy or Training (“ACT” in either case) are arguably entering their 5th decade of development. This paper describes features of their early history and divides development into three phases, plus a fourth that is just beginning. In the context of that review, it examines what can be learned by a content analysis of the first ∼1000 randomized controlled trials on ACT-based interventions, from 1986 through 2022. The expansive vision of CBS and the early ACT research base defined their breadth as far wider than psychological intervention targeting traditional psychiatric syndromes, emphasizing instead the principles, processes, and components needed for a more generally applicable approach. After an era of scientific establishment, ACT research has expanded globally and topically. Many RCTs now take place in lower- and middle-income countries with cultural and policy environments that give rise to unique research priorities. Finally, based on the ACBS Task Force Report and new research findings, we suggest that ACT research may be entering a new era of personalized and process-based intervention based on new “idionomic” forms of functional analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100809"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000899/pdfft?md5=16f670a61f9bec5eecb02323d2278f9b&pid=1-s2.0-S2212144724000899-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000899","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contextual Behavioral Science (CBS) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy or Training (“ACT” in either case) are arguably entering their 5th decade of development. This paper describes features of their early history and divides development into three phases, plus a fourth that is just beginning. In the context of that review, it examines what can be learned by a content analysis of the first ∼1000 randomized controlled trials on ACT-based interventions, from 1986 through 2022. The expansive vision of CBS and the early ACT research base defined their breadth as far wider than psychological intervention targeting traditional psychiatric syndromes, emphasizing instead the principles, processes, and components needed for a more generally applicable approach. After an era of scientific establishment, ACT research has expanded globally and topically. Many RCTs now take place in lower- and middle-income countries with cultural and policy environments that give rise to unique research priorities. Finally, based on the ACBS Task Force Report and new research findings, we suggest that ACT research may be entering a new era of personalized and process-based intervention based on new “idionomic” forms of functional analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接纳与承诺疗法:接纳与承诺疗法的历史和前 1000 项随机对照试验的启示
情境行为科学(Contextual Behavioral Science,CBS)和接纳与承诺疗法或训练(Aceptance and Commitment Therapy or Training,"ACT")可以说已经进入了它们发展的第五个十年。本文描述了它们早期历史的特点,并将发展分为三个阶段,加上刚刚开始的第四个阶段。在这一回顾的背景下,本文研究了从 1986 年到 2022 年对基于 ACT 的干预措施进行的 1000 多项随机对照试验的内容分析。CBS和早期ACT研究基础的广阔视野将其广度定义为远远超出针对传统精神综合症的心理干预,而是强调一种更普遍适用的方法所需的原则、过程和组成部分。经过一个科学确立的时代之后,ACT 研究已经扩展到全球和各个领域。目前,许多 RCT 研究都是在中低收入国家进行的,这些国家的文化和政策环境决定了其研究重点的独特性。最后,根据 ACBS 特别工作组的报告和新的研究成果,我们认为 ACT 研究可能正在进入一个基于新的 "idionomic "功能分析形式的个性化和基于过程的干预的新时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of a brief, remote self-compassion intervention for employed mothers Exploring the interconnectedness of depression, anxiety, diabetes distress, and related psychosocial factors in adults with type 2 diabetes: A network analysis Effects of a randomized controlled trial of mobile app-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on depressive symptoms and process variables in college students - Focusing on the mediating effects of acceptance and cognitive defusion- Changes in university students’ behaviour and study burnout risk during ACT-based online course intervention: A mixed methods study Third wave interventions for adolescents with mental health disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1