{"title":"Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor use after solid organ transplant.","authors":"Siddhartha G Kapnadak, Kathleen J Ramos","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>In 2019, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved a breakthrough therapeutic for cystic fibrosis, elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI), because of its profound effect on lung function in large phase III clinical trials. ETI acts directly on the dysfunctional protein that causes the systemic manifestations of cystic fibrosis and also leads to improvement in nonpulmonary symptoms of cystic fibrosis. Transplant recipients were excluded from the pivotal clinical trials of ETI but may stand to benefit from correction of the underlying protein defect. Drug interactions between the three drugs in ETI and immunosuppression medications are one of the primary concerns about using ETI after transplant. No rigorous studies exist to assess the safety of ETI in transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Multiple recent publications describe the use of ETI after solid organ transplantation, including lung and nonlung transplants, and the real-world evidence for drug interactions between ETI and immunosuppression medications. In nonlung transplant recipients, the pulmonary benefits of ETI have been confirmed, but adverse events occur and may have implications for their transplanted organ (e.g. liver biopsy in the setting of elevated transaminases). Lung transplant recipients may have higher rates of ETI discontinuation than nontransplant recipients given a lack of direct pulmonary benefit and frequency of side effects. Drug interactions have not been difficult to manage, with most studies reporting variable rates of mild to moderate increased tacrolimus levels after initiation of ETI.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Limited data exist to support the use of ETI after solid organ transplantation and further research is warranted. Given the unknown risks and benefits, case by case consideration of ETI use is indicated when extra-pulmonary manifestations are present in lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis. Given the proven benefit in cystic fibrosis lung disease, benefits likely outweigh the risks of ETI for nonlung solid organ transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: In 2019, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved a breakthrough therapeutic for cystic fibrosis, elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI), because of its profound effect on lung function in large phase III clinical trials. ETI acts directly on the dysfunctional protein that causes the systemic manifestations of cystic fibrosis and also leads to improvement in nonpulmonary symptoms of cystic fibrosis. Transplant recipients were excluded from the pivotal clinical trials of ETI but may stand to benefit from correction of the underlying protein defect. Drug interactions between the three drugs in ETI and immunosuppression medications are one of the primary concerns about using ETI after transplant. No rigorous studies exist to assess the safety of ETI in transplant recipients.
Recent findings: Multiple recent publications describe the use of ETI after solid organ transplantation, including lung and nonlung transplants, and the real-world evidence for drug interactions between ETI and immunosuppression medications. In nonlung transplant recipients, the pulmonary benefits of ETI have been confirmed, but adverse events occur and may have implications for their transplanted organ (e.g. liver biopsy in the setting of elevated transaminases). Lung transplant recipients may have higher rates of ETI discontinuation than nontransplant recipients given a lack of direct pulmonary benefit and frequency of side effects. Drug interactions have not been difficult to manage, with most studies reporting variable rates of mild to moderate increased tacrolimus levels after initiation of ETI.
Summary: Limited data exist to support the use of ETI after solid organ transplantation and further research is warranted. Given the unknown risks and benefits, case by case consideration of ETI use is indicated when extra-pulmonary manifestations are present in lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis. Given the proven benefit in cystic fibrosis lung disease, benefits likely outweigh the risks of ETI for nonlung solid organ transplant recipients.
审查目的:2019年,美国食品和药物管理局批准了一种治疗囊性纤维化的突破性疗法--elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor(ETI),因为它在大型III期临床试验中对肺功能产生了深远影响。ETI 直接作用于导致囊性纤维化全身表现的功能障碍蛋白,还能改善囊性纤维化的非肺部症状。移植受者被排除在 ETI 的关键临床试验之外,但他们可能会从纠正潜在的蛋白质缺陷中获益。ETI 中的三种药物与免疫抑制药物之间的药物相互作用是移植后使用 ETI 的主要顾虑之一。目前还没有严格的研究来评估 ETI 在移植受者中的安全性:最近的多篇论文介绍了实体器官移植(包括肺移植和非肺移植)后使用 ETI 的情况,以及 ETI 与免疫抑制药物之间药物相互作用的实际证据。在非肺移植受者中,ETI 的肺部益处已得到证实,但不良事件时有发生,并可能对其移植器官产生影响(如转氨酶升高时的肝活检)。肺移植受者由于缺乏直接的肺部益处且副作用频发,因此停用 ETI 的比例可能高于非移植受者。药物相互作用并不难处理,大多数研究报告称,开始使用 ETI 后,他克莫司水平轻度至中度升高的比例不一。小结:支持在实体器官移植后使用 ETI 的数据有限,需要进一步研究。鉴于风险和益处不明,当囊性纤维化肺移植受者出现肺外表现时,应根据具体情况考虑使用 ETI。鉴于对囊性纤维化肺病的益处已得到证实,对非肺部实体器官移植受者来说,使用 ETI 的益处可能大于风险。