Motor learning alters vision, but vision does not alter motor learning.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1152/jn.00175.2023
Alexander Cates, Keith E Gordon
{"title":"Motor learning alters vision, but vision does not alter motor learning.","authors":"Alexander Cates, Keith E Gordon","doi":"10.1152/jn.00175.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During visuomotor learning, improvements in motor performance accompany changes in how people use vision. However, the dependencies between altered visual reliance and improvements in motor skill is unclear. The present studies used an online sequence learning task to quantify how changing the availability of visual information affected motor skill learning (<i>study 1</i>) and how changing motor skill affected visual reliance (<i>study 2</i>). Participants used their keyboard to respond to targets falling vertically down a game screen. In <i>study 1</i> (<i>n</i> = 49), the availability of visual information was altered by manipulating where the targets were visible on the screen. Three experimental groups practiced the task during full or limited vision conditions (when the targets were only visible in specific areas). We hypothesized that limiting visual information would reduce motor learning (i.e., the rate of improvement during training trial blocks). Instead, although participants performed worse during limited vision trials (<i>P</i> < 0.001), there was no difference in learning rate (<i>P</i> = 0.87). In <i>study 2</i> (<i>n</i> = 119), all participants practiced the task with full vision and their visual reliance (i.e., their performance change between full and limited vision conditions) was quantified before and after training. We hypothesized that with motor learning, visual reliance on future targets would increase, whereas visual reliance on the current targets would decrease. The results of <i>study 2</i> partially support our hypotheses with visual reliance decreasing for all visual areas (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Together, the results suggest changing motor skill alters how people use vision, but changing visual availability does not affect motor learning.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Previous research has established how people use visual information changes with motor learning. However, the dependencies of these two processes on each other are unclear. We find that limiting the availability of visual information degrades motor performance but not motor learning. We also find that motor learning reduces the impact of limiting the availability of visual information on motor performance. Together, these results suggest that how people use visual information depends on their motor skill.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00175.2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During visuomotor learning, improvements in motor performance accompany changes in how people use vision. However, the dependencies between altered visual reliance and improvements in motor skill is unclear. The present studies used an online sequence learning task to quantify how changing the availability of visual information affected motor skill learning (study 1) and how changing motor skill affected visual reliance (study 2). Participants used their keyboard to respond to targets falling vertically down a game screen. In study 1 (n = 49), the availability of visual information was altered by manipulating where the targets were visible on the screen. Three experimental groups practiced the task during full or limited vision conditions (when the targets were only visible in specific areas). We hypothesized that limiting visual information would reduce motor learning (i.e., the rate of improvement during training trial blocks). Instead, although participants performed worse during limited vision trials (P < 0.001), there was no difference in learning rate (P = 0.87). In study 2 (n = 119), all participants practiced the task with full vision and their visual reliance (i.e., their performance change between full and limited vision conditions) was quantified before and after training. We hypothesized that with motor learning, visual reliance on future targets would increase, whereas visual reliance on the current targets would decrease. The results of study 2 partially support our hypotheses with visual reliance decreasing for all visual areas (P < 0.001). Together, the results suggest changing motor skill alters how people use vision, but changing visual availability does not affect motor learning.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous research has established how people use visual information changes with motor learning. However, the dependencies of these two processes on each other are unclear. We find that limiting the availability of visual information degrades motor performance but not motor learning. We also find that motor learning reduces the impact of limiting the availability of visual information on motor performance. Together, these results suggest that how people use visual information depends on their motor skill.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动学习会改变视觉,但视觉不会改变运动学习。
在视觉运动学习过程中,运动能力的提高伴随着人们使用视觉方式的改变。然而,视觉依赖性的改变与运动技能的提高之间的依存关系尚不清楚。本研究使用在线序列学习任务来量化改变视觉信息的可用性如何影响运动技能学习(研究一)以及改变运动技能如何影响视觉依赖性(研究二)。参与者使用键盘对游戏屏幕上垂直落下的目标做出反应。在研究一(人数=49)中,通过操纵目标在屏幕上的可见位置来改变视觉信息的可用性。三个实验组在完全或有限视觉条件下(目标仅在特定区域可见)进行任务练习。我们假设,限制视觉信息会减少运动学习(即在训练试块中的进步率)。相反,虽然受试者在有限视觉条件下的表现较差(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
期刊最新文献
A 5-week centrifuge-based G training with feedback on the magnitude of G force, does not improve the perception of roll tilt during simulated coordinated turns. ALTERED CONTROL OF BREATHING IN A RAT MODEL OF ALLERGIC LOWER AIRWAY INFLAMMATION. Ictal and interictal epileptic networks of 34 patients with Hypothalamic Hamartoma on scalp electroencephalography. Investigating premotor corticospinal excitability in fast and slow voluntary contractions of the elbow flexors. Rat movements reflect internal decision dynamics in an evidence accumulation task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1