Patient's satisfaction level with community pharmacies services in Romania: a questionnaire-based study.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2024.2381104
Etidal-Mihaela Manoliu-Hamwi, Cristina Gena Dascălu, Georgeta Zegan, Elena-Mihaela Cărăușu, Cristina Mihaela Ghiciuc, Mircea Cătălin Ivănescu, Cătălina Daniela Stan
{"title":"Patient's satisfaction level with community pharmacies services in Romania: a questionnaire-based study.","authors":"Etidal-Mihaela Manoliu-Hamwi, Cristina Gena Dascălu, Georgeta Zegan, Elena-Mihaela Cărăușu, Cristina Mihaela Ghiciuc, Mircea Cătălin Ivănescu, Cătălina Daniela Stan","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2381104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The patient satisfaction questionnaires in literature are according to the community pharmacies services in the authors' countries and not all have psychometric reports to support the results. We designed a questionnaire specific to the services of community pharmacies in Romania to evaluate the level of patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a cross-sectional study on voluntary patients. The questionnaire consisted of 22 items, grouped into three domains corresponding to patient satisfaction with pharmacies, pharmaceutical staff and medication availability, and four subdomains related to pharmaceutical staff skills. The 5-point Likert scale was used. Statistical analysis was done in SPSS 27.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's Alpha was 0.861. The Inter-rater Agreement was 72.0%, the Item Content Validity was 97.6% and the completeness index was 100%. The factor analysis indicated 6 factors (Eigen values >1.0). The 809 patients had a median of overall satisfaction score of 3.77; the median was 4.0 regarding satisfaction score with pharmaceutical staff skills. Respondents characteristics varied the patient's satisfaction level (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reliability and validity of the questionnaire have been demonstrated. Overall patient satisfaction with community pharmacy services had a moderate level, but the attitude and confidence in the pharmacist had a high level of satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2381104"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2381104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The patient satisfaction questionnaires in literature are according to the community pharmacies services in the authors' countries and not all have psychometric reports to support the results. We designed a questionnaire specific to the services of community pharmacies in Romania to evaluate the level of patient satisfaction.

Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional study on voluntary patients. The questionnaire consisted of 22 items, grouped into three domains corresponding to patient satisfaction with pharmacies, pharmaceutical staff and medication availability, and four subdomains related to pharmaceutical staff skills. The 5-point Likert scale was used. Statistical analysis was done in SPSS 27.0.

Results: The Cronbach's Alpha was 0.861. The Inter-rater Agreement was 72.0%, the Item Content Validity was 97.6% and the completeness index was 100%. The factor analysis indicated 6 factors (Eigen values >1.0). The 809 patients had a median of overall satisfaction score of 3.77; the median was 4.0 regarding satisfaction score with pharmaceutical staff skills. Respondents characteristics varied the patient's satisfaction level (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusions: The reliability and validity of the questionnaire have been demonstrated. Overall patient satisfaction with community pharmacy services had a moderate level, but the attitude and confidence in the pharmacist had a high level of satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗马尼亚患者对社区药房服务的满意度:一项基于问卷的研究。
引言:文献中的患者满意度问卷都是根据作者所在国家的社区药房服务而设计的,并非所有问卷都有心理测量报告来支持其结果。我们设计了一份专门针对罗马尼亚社区药房服务的问卷,以评估患者的满意度:我们对自愿参加的患者进行了横断面研究。问卷由 22 个项目组成,分为患者对药房、药剂师和药品供应满意度三个领域,以及与药剂师技能相关的四个子领域。问卷采用 5 点李克特量表。统计分析在 SPSS 27.0 中进行:Cronbach's Alpha 为 0.861。评分者之间的一致性为 72.0%,项目内容有效性为 97.6%,完整性指数为 100%。因子分析显示有 6 个因子(特征值大于 1.0)。809 名患者的总体满意度中位数为 3.77;对药剂师技能的满意度中位数为 4.0。受访者的特征会影响患者的满意度(P ≤ 0.05):结论:调查问卷的可靠性和有效性已得到证实。患者对社区药房服务的总体满意度处于中等水平,但对药剂师的态度和信心的满意度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of community pharmacists' experiences and perceptions on gabapentin abuse in Jordan: a cross-sectional study. Assessment of knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of healthcare professionals towards clinical pharmacogenomics implementation in Qatar: a mixed-method study. Exploring Jordanian medical students' perceptions and concerns about ChatGPT in medical education: a cross-sectional study. Pharmaceutical multinational corporations (MNCs) and their exit from low and middle income countries (LMICs): analysing the causes and consequences. Prescriber perceptions of the safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin in the acute treatment phase: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1