Being the supervisor: A duo-ethnographic exploration of social justice in postgraduate health professions education.

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1111/medu.15485
Janneke Frambach, Susan van Schalkwyk
{"title":"Being the supervisor: A duo-ethnographic exploration of social justice in postgraduate health professions education.","authors":"Janneke Frambach, Susan van Schalkwyk","doi":"10.1111/medu.15485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is growing global awareness of the importance of matters of equity and social justice. In health professions education (HPE), research has focused at undergraduate level and on health sciences curricula. Increasingly, health care professionals engage in HPE Master's and doctoral studies, where they are educated as curriculum designers and 'producers' of knowledge through their research. Considering their role in shaping what (and how it) is taught in health sciences curricula, questions can be asked about the extent to which postgraduate pedagogies are mindful of matters of social justice. As supervisors of postgraduate HPE students and as directors of such programmes, we interrogated and juxtaposed our perspectives on social justice and how these perspectives influence our postgraduate HPE supervisory and directing practices in our respective contexts.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Utilising a duo-ethnographic approach, in which we each represented a site of enquiry, we generated data through written reflections and dialogic engagement framed around research questions about (1) our understanding of social justice, (2) how this influenced our practices as postgraduate supervisors and (3) how this influenced our practices and policies as directors of postgraduate studies. We recorded and transcribed our data generation meetings. Based on open coding of the transcriptions and written reflections, we constructed a conversation around our research questions. We integrated our reflexive journals in the conversation.</p><p><strong>Findings and discussion: </strong>Our conversations were characterised by three sets of ideas involving the terminology around social justice, the complex nature of social justice, and the individual and social justice. These played out differently in our contexts, but they caution both of us against assumptions and encourage us to create time for conversations with our students, to consider what we 'teach' them, how we guide them and how we avoid gatekeeping their entry into the disciplinary space.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15485","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is growing global awareness of the importance of matters of equity and social justice. In health professions education (HPE), research has focused at undergraduate level and on health sciences curricula. Increasingly, health care professionals engage in HPE Master's and doctoral studies, where they are educated as curriculum designers and 'producers' of knowledge through their research. Considering their role in shaping what (and how it) is taught in health sciences curricula, questions can be asked about the extent to which postgraduate pedagogies are mindful of matters of social justice. As supervisors of postgraduate HPE students and as directors of such programmes, we interrogated and juxtaposed our perspectives on social justice and how these perspectives influence our postgraduate HPE supervisory and directing practices in our respective contexts.

Methodology: Utilising a duo-ethnographic approach, in which we each represented a site of enquiry, we generated data through written reflections and dialogic engagement framed around research questions about (1) our understanding of social justice, (2) how this influenced our practices as postgraduate supervisors and (3) how this influenced our practices and policies as directors of postgraduate studies. We recorded and transcribed our data generation meetings. Based on open coding of the transcriptions and written reflections, we constructed a conversation around our research questions. We integrated our reflexive journals in the conversation.

Findings and discussion: Our conversations were characterised by three sets of ideas involving the terminology around social justice, the complex nature of social justice, and the individual and social justice. These played out differently in our contexts, but they caution both of us against assumptions and encourage us to create time for conversations with our students, to consider what we 'teach' them, how we guide them and how we avoid gatekeeping their entry into the disciplinary space.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为导师:对健康专业研究生教育中的社会正义进行双人人种学探索。
背景:全球日益认识到公平和社会正义问题的重要性。在卫生专业教育(HPE)方面,研究主要集中在本科阶段和卫生科学课程上。越来越多的卫生保健专业人员开始攻读卫生保健专业教育硕士和博士课程,他们通过研究成为课程设计者和知识的 "生产者"。考虑到他们在塑造健康科学课程的教学内容(以及教学方式)方面所扮演的角色,我们可以问一问研究生教学法在多大程度上考虑到了社会公正问题。作为 HPE 研究生的导师和此类课程的主任,我们对社会正义的观点以及这些观点如何在我们各自的背景下影响我们的 HPE 研究生导师和主任实践进行了审视和并置:采用双人人种学方法,我们各自代表一个调查点,通过书面反思和对话参与生成数据,这些数据围绕以下研究问题:(1) 我们对社会公正的理解;(2) 这如何影响我们作为研究生导师的实践;(3) 这如何影响我们作为研究生主任的实践和政策。我们记录并转录了我们的数据生成会议。在对记录和书面反思进行开放式编码的基础上,我们围绕研究问题展开了对话。我们将反思性日志纳入了对话:我们的对话有三组观点,分别涉及社会公正的术语、社会公正的复杂性以及个人与社会公正。这些观点在我们的语境中发挥着不同的作用,但它们告诫我们双方不要臆断,并鼓励我们为与学生的对话创造时间,考虑我们 "教 "他们什么,我们如何引导他们,以及我们如何避免为他们进入学科空间把关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
A realist evaluation of prospective entrustment decisions in paediatric residency clinical competency committees. Putting 'leader' back into leadership training. Supporting resident inbox management with screen-casted videos. Enhancing telehealth Objective Structured Clinical Examination fidelity with integrated Electronic Health Record simulation. Equity, diversity, and inclusion in entrustable professional activities based assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1