Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning-based Models in Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1097/INF.0000000000004409
Deepika Kainth, Satya Prakash, M Jeeva Sankar
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning-based Models in Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Deepika Kainth, Satya Prakash, M Jeeva Sankar","doi":"10.1097/INF.0000000000004409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is challenging. We aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of sophisticated machine learning (ML) techniques for the prediction of neonatal sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL databases using \"neonate,\" \"sepsis\" and \"machine learning\" as search terms. We included studies that developed or validated an ML algorithm to predict neonatal sepsis. Those incorporating automated vital-sign data were excluded. Among 5008 records, 74 full-text articles were screened. Two reviewers extracted information as per the CHARMS (CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies) checklist. We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guideline extension for diagnostic test accuracy reviews and used the PROBAST tool for risk of bias assessment. Primary outcome was a predictive performance of ML models in terms of sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. We generated a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics curve for pooled analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 19 studies (15,984 participants) with 76 ML models, the random forest algorithm was the most employed. The candidate predictors per model ranged from 5 to 93; most included birth weight and gestation. None performed external validation. The risk of bias was high (18 studies). For the prediction of any sepsis (14 studies), pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% credible interval: 0.75-0.94) and specificity was 0.89 (95% credible interval: 0.77-0.95). Pooled area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.94 (95% credible interval: 0.92-0.96). All studies, except one, used data from high- or upper-middle-income countries. With unavailable probability thresholds, the performance could not be assessed with sufficient precision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML techniques have good diagnostic accuracy for neonatal sepsis. The need for the development of context-specific models from high-burden countries is highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19858,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000004409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Timely diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is challenging. We aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of sophisticated machine learning (ML) techniques for the prediction of neonatal sepsis.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL databases using "neonate," "sepsis" and "machine learning" as search terms. We included studies that developed or validated an ML algorithm to predict neonatal sepsis. Those incorporating automated vital-sign data were excluded. Among 5008 records, 74 full-text articles were screened. Two reviewers extracted information as per the CHARMS (CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies) checklist. We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guideline extension for diagnostic test accuracy reviews and used the PROBAST tool for risk of bias assessment. Primary outcome was a predictive performance of ML models in terms of sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. We generated a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics curve for pooled analysis.

Results: Of 19 studies (15,984 participants) with 76 ML models, the random forest algorithm was the most employed. The candidate predictors per model ranged from 5 to 93; most included birth weight and gestation. None performed external validation. The risk of bias was high (18 studies). For the prediction of any sepsis (14 studies), pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% credible interval: 0.75-0.94) and specificity was 0.89 (95% credible interval: 0.77-0.95). Pooled area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.94 (95% credible interval: 0.92-0.96). All studies, except one, used data from high- or upper-middle-income countries. With unavailable probability thresholds, the performance could not be assessed with sufficient precision.

Conclusions: ML techniques have good diagnostic accuracy for neonatal sepsis. The need for the development of context-specific models from high-burden countries is highlighted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的新生儿败血症模型的诊断性能:系统回顾
背景:及时诊断新生儿败血症具有挑战性。我们旨在系统评估复杂的机器学习(ML)技术在预测新生儿败血症方面的诊断性能:我们使用 "新生儿"、"败血症 "和 "机器学习 "作为检索词,检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 数据库。我们纳入了开发或验证了预测新生儿败血症的机器学习算法的研究。排除了包含自动生命体征数据的研究。在 5008 条记录中,筛选出 74 篇全文文章。两名审稿人按照 CHARMS(预测建模研究系统性综述的关键评估和数据提取清单)清单提取信息。我们遵循 PRISMA(系统性综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南扩展条款进行诊断测试准确性综述,并使用 PROBAST 工具进行偏倚风险评估。主要结果是 ML 模型在灵敏度、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值方面的预测性能。我们生成了分层汇总接收者操作特征曲线,用于汇总分析:在 19 项研究(15984 名参与者)的 76 个 ML 模型中,采用最多的是随机森林算法。每个模型的候选预测因子从 5 个到 93 个不等;大多数包括出生体重和妊娠期。没有一项研究进行了外部验证。偏倚风险较高(18 项研究)。对于任何败血症的预测(14 项研究),汇总灵敏度为 0.87(95% 可信区间:0.75-0.94),特异性为 0.89(95% 可信区间:0.77-0.95)。接收者操作特征曲线下的汇总面积为 0.94(95% 可信区间:0.92-0.96)。除一项研究外,所有研究都使用了高收入或中上收入国家的数据。由于无法获得概率阈值,因此无法对其性能进行足够精确的评估:ML技术对新生儿败血症具有良好的诊断准确性。结论:ML 技术对新生儿败血症具有良好的诊断准确性,但需要针对高负担国家的具体情况开发模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal® (PIDJ) is a complete, up-to-the-minute resource on infectious diseases in children. Through a mix of original studies, informative review articles, and unique case reports, PIDJ delivers the latest insights on combating disease in children — from state-of-the-art diagnostic techniques to the most effective drug therapies and other treatment protocols. It is a resource that can improve patient care and stimulate your personal research.
期刊最新文献
Actinomyces timonensis: A Novel Pathogen to Not Overlook in Immunocompetent Children With Recurrent Cutaneous Abscesses. Cat Scratch Disease in Pediatrics: Who Has Systemic Involvement? CHARACTERIZATION OF CLINICAL AND BIOLOGIC MANIFESTATIONS OF CHIKUNGUNYA AMONG CHILDREN IN AN URBAN AREA, THAILAND: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY. Clinical Presentations of Parvovirus B19: A Case Series. Disseminated Paracoccidioidomycosis With Severe Ophthalmologic Involvement in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1