Acceptability and Engagement of a Smartphone-Delivered Interpretation Bias Intervention in a Sample of Black and Latinx Adults: Open Trial.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Jmir Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.2196/56758
IreLee Ferguson, Grace George, Kevin O Narine, Amari Turner, Zelda McGhee, Harris Bajwa, Frances G Hart, Sierra Carter, Courtney Beard
{"title":"Acceptability and Engagement of a Smartphone-Delivered Interpretation Bias Intervention in a Sample of Black and Latinx Adults: Open Trial.","authors":"IreLee Ferguson, Grace George, Kevin O Narine, Amari Turner, Zelda McGhee, Harris Bajwa, Frances G Hart, Sierra Carter, Courtney Beard","doi":"10.2196/56758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to evidence-based interventions is urgently required, especially for individuals of minoritized identities who experience unique barriers to mental health care. Digital mental health interventions have the potential to increase accessibility. Previous pilot studies testing HabitWorks, a smartphone app providing an interpretation bias intervention, have found strong engagement and adherence for HabitWorks; however, previous trials' samples consisted of predominantly non-Hispanic, White individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study conducted an open trial of HabitWorks in a community sample of adults who identified as Black, Hispanic or Latinx, or both. This study aims to test safety, acceptability, and engagement with the HabitWorks app for Black and Latinx adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Black, Hispanic or Latinx adults (mean age 32.83, SD 11.06 y; 22/31, 71% women) who endorsed symptoms of anxiety or depression were asked to complete interpretation modification exercises via HabitWorks 3 times per week for 1 month. Interpretation bias and anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed at baseline and posttreatment assessments. Participants completed qualitative interviews to assess overall perceptions of HabitWorks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 31 participants that downloaded the app, 27 (87%) used HabitWorks all 4 weeks. On average, participants completed 15.74 (SD 7.43) exercises out of the 12 prescribed, demonstrating high engagement. Acceptability ratings met all a priori benchmarks except for relevancy. Qualitative interviews also demonstrated high acceptability and few negative experiences. Significant improvements were found in interpretation style (t<sub>30</sub>=2.29; P<.001), with a large effect size (Cohen d=1.53); anxiety symptoms (t<sub>30</sub>=2.29; P=.03), with a small effect size (Cohen d=0.41); and depression symptoms (t<sub>30</sub>=3.065; P=.005), with a medium effect size (Cohen d=0.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study adds to the literature evaluating digital mental health interventions in Black and Latinx adults. Preliminary results further support a future controlled trial testing the effectiveness of HabitWorks as an intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jmir Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/56758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access to evidence-based interventions is urgently required, especially for individuals of minoritized identities who experience unique barriers to mental health care. Digital mental health interventions have the potential to increase accessibility. Previous pilot studies testing HabitWorks, a smartphone app providing an interpretation bias intervention, have found strong engagement and adherence for HabitWorks; however, previous trials' samples consisted of predominantly non-Hispanic, White individuals.

Objective: This study conducted an open trial of HabitWorks in a community sample of adults who identified as Black, Hispanic or Latinx, or both. This study aims to test safety, acceptability, and engagement with the HabitWorks app for Black and Latinx adults.

Methods: Black, Hispanic or Latinx adults (mean age 32.83, SD 11.06 y; 22/31, 71% women) who endorsed symptoms of anxiety or depression were asked to complete interpretation modification exercises via HabitWorks 3 times per week for 1 month. Interpretation bias and anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed at baseline and posttreatment assessments. Participants completed qualitative interviews to assess overall perceptions of HabitWorks.

Results: Of the 31 participants that downloaded the app, 27 (87%) used HabitWorks all 4 weeks. On average, participants completed 15.74 (SD 7.43) exercises out of the 12 prescribed, demonstrating high engagement. Acceptability ratings met all a priori benchmarks except for relevancy. Qualitative interviews also demonstrated high acceptability and few negative experiences. Significant improvements were found in interpretation style (t30=2.29; P<.001), with a large effect size (Cohen d=1.53); anxiety symptoms (t30=2.29; P=.03), with a small effect size (Cohen d=0.41); and depression symptoms (t30=3.065; P=.005), with a medium effect size (Cohen d=0.55).

Conclusions: This study adds to the literature evaluating digital mental health interventions in Black and Latinx adults. Preliminary results further support a future controlled trial testing the effectiveness of HabitWorks as an intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在黑人和拉美裔成年人样本中开展智能手机传播的解释偏差干预的可接受性和参与度:公开试验。
背景:我们迫切需要获得循证干预措施,尤其是那些在心理健康护理方面面临独特障碍的少数群体。数字心理健康干预措施具有提高可及性的潜力。以前的试点研究测试了 HabitWorks,这是一款提供解释偏差干预的智能手机应用程序,研究发现 HabitWorks 的参与度和坚持率都很高;但是,以前的试验样本主要由非西班牙裔白人组成:本研究在社区样本中对 HabitWorks 进行了公开试验,样本为自称为黑人、西班牙裔或拉丁裔或两者皆是的成年人。本研究旨在测试黑人和拉美裔成年人使用 HabitWorks 应用程序的安全性、可接受性和参与度:要求有焦虑或抑郁症状的黑人、西班牙裔或拉丁裔成年人(平均年龄 32.83 岁,SD 11.06 岁;22/31,71% 为女性)在 1 个月内每周 3 次通过 HabitWorks 完成口译练习。在基线和治疗后评估中对解释偏差以及焦虑和抑郁症状进行了评估。参与者还完成了定性访谈,以评估对 HabitWorks 的总体看法:在 31 名下载了 HabitWorks 应用程序的参与者中,有 27 人(87%)在 4 周内都使用了 HabitWorks。在规定的 12 项练习中,参与者平均完成了 15.74 项练习(标准差为 7.43),显示出较高的参与度。除相关性外,可接受性评级符合所有先验基准。定性访谈也显示了较高的可接受性和较少的负面体验。在解释风格(t30=2.29;P30=2.29;P=.03)和抑郁症状(t30=3.065;P=.005)方面发现了显著的改善,其影响程度较小(Cohen d=0.41),影响程度中等(Cohen d=0.55):本研究为评估黑人和拉美裔成年人数字心理健康干预措施的文献增添了新的内容。初步结果进一步支持了未来对 HabitWorks 干预效果的对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jmir Mental Health
Jmir Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
104
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Mental Health (JMH, ISSN 2368-7959) is a PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed sister journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR Mental Health focusses on digital health and Internet interventions, technologies and electronic innovations (software and hardware) for mental health, addictions, online counselling and behaviour change. This includes formative evaluation and system descriptions, theoretical papers, review papers, viewpoint/vision papers, and rigorous evaluations.
期刊最新文献
Digital Psychotherapies for Adults Experiencing Depressive Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Leveraging Personal Technologies in the Treatment of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: Scoping Review. Generation of Backward-Looking Complex Reflections for a Motivational Interviewing-Based Smoking Cessation Chatbot Using GPT-4: Algorithm Development and Validation. The Most Effective Interventions for Classification Model Development to Predict Chat Outcomes Based on the Conversation Content in Online Suicide Prevention Chats: Machine Learning Approach. Empathy Toward Artificial Intelligence Versus Human Experiences and the Role of Transparency in Mental Health and Social Support Chatbot Design: Comparative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1