Ultra-high frequency repetitive TMS at subthreshold intensity induces suprathreshold motor response via temporal summation.

Hieu Nguyen, Charlotte Qiong Li, Samantha Hoffman, Zhi-De Deng, Yihong Yang, Hanbing Lu
{"title":"Ultra-high frequency repetitive TMS at subthreshold intensity induces suprathreshold motor response via temporal summation.","authors":"Hieu Nguyen, Charlotte Qiong Li, Samantha Hoffman, Zhi-De Deng, Yihong Yang, Hanbing Lu","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/ad692f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>The transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil induces an electric field that diminishes rapidly upon entering the brain. This presents a challenge in achieving focal stimulation of a deep brain structure. Neuronal elements, including axons, dendrites, and cell bodies, exhibit specific time constants. When exposed to repetitive TMS pulses at a high frequency, there is a cumulative effect on neuronal membrane potentials, resulting in temporal summation. This study aims to determine whether TMS pulse train at high-frequency and subthreshold intensity could induce a suprathreshold response.<i>Approach.</i>As a proof of concept, we developed a TMS machine in-house that could consistently output pulses up to 250 Hz, and performed experiments on 22 awake rats to test whether temporal summation was detectable under pulse trains at 100, 166, or 250 Hz.<i>Main results.</i>Results revealed that TMS pulses at 55% maximum stimulator output (MSO, peak d<i>I</i>/d<i>t</i>= 68.5 A/<i>μ</i>s at 100% MSO, pulse width = 48<i>μ</i>s) did not induce motor responses with either single pulses or pulse trains. Similarly, a single TMS pulse at 65% MSO failed to evoke a motor response in rats; however, a train of TMS pulses at frequencies of 166 and 250 Hz, but not at 100 Hz, successfully triggered motor responses and MEP signals, suggesting a temporal summation effect dependent on both pulse intensities and pulse train frequencies.<i>Significance.</i>We propose that the temporal summation effect can be leveraged to design the next-generation focal TMS system: by sequentially driving multiple coils at high-frequency and subthreshold intensity, areas with the most significant overlapping E-fields undergo maximal temporal summation effects, resulting in a suprathreshold response.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11307324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad692f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.The transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil induces an electric field that diminishes rapidly upon entering the brain. This presents a challenge in achieving focal stimulation of a deep brain structure. Neuronal elements, including axons, dendrites, and cell bodies, exhibit specific time constants. When exposed to repetitive TMS pulses at a high frequency, there is a cumulative effect on neuronal membrane potentials, resulting in temporal summation. This study aims to determine whether TMS pulse train at high-frequency and subthreshold intensity could induce a suprathreshold response.Approach.As a proof of concept, we developed a TMS machine in-house that could consistently output pulses up to 250 Hz, and performed experiments on 22 awake rats to test whether temporal summation was detectable under pulse trains at 100, 166, or 250 Hz.Main results.Results revealed that TMS pulses at 55% maximum stimulator output (MSO, peak dI/dt= 68.5 A/μs at 100% MSO, pulse width = 48μs) did not induce motor responses with either single pulses or pulse trains. Similarly, a single TMS pulse at 65% MSO failed to evoke a motor response in rats; however, a train of TMS pulses at frequencies of 166 and 250 Hz, but not at 100 Hz, successfully triggered motor responses and MEP signals, suggesting a temporal summation effect dependent on both pulse intensities and pulse train frequencies.Significance.We propose that the temporal summation effect can be leveraged to design the next-generation focal TMS system: by sequentially driving multiple coils at high-frequency and subthreshold intensity, areas with the most significant overlapping E-fields undergo maximal temporal summation effects, resulting in a suprathreshold response.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阈下强度的超高频重复经颅磁刺激可通过时间总和诱导阈上运动反应。
目的:经颅磁刺激(TMS经颅磁刺激(TMS)线圈产生的电场在进入大脑后会迅速减弱。这给实现对大脑深层结构的聚焦刺激带来了挑战。神经元元件,包括轴突、树突和细胞体,都表现出特定的时间常数。当暴露于高频率的重复经颅磁刺激脉冲时,神经元膜电位会产生累积效应,导致时间累加。本研究旨在确定高频率、亚阈值强度的 TMS 脉冲序列能否诱发超阈值反应:作为概念验证,我们在内部开发了一台能持续输出高达 250 Hz 脉冲的 TMS 机器,并在 22 只清醒大鼠身上进行了实验,以测试在 100、166 或 250 Hz 的脉冲串下是否能检测到时间相加:主要结果:实验结果表明,在55%最大刺激器输出(MSO,峰值dI/dt = 68.5 A/s at 100% MSO,脉宽 = 48 s )的TMS脉冲下,无论是单脉冲还是脉冲串都不会诱发运动反应。同样,MSO 为 65% 的单个 TMS 脉冲也未能唤起大鼠的运动反应;然而,频率为 166 和 250 Hz(但不是 100 Hz)的 TMS 脉冲串成功触发了运动反应和 MEP 信号,这表明时间累加效应取决于脉冲强度和脉冲串频率:我们提出,可以利用时间相加效应来设计下一代病灶 TMS 系统:通过以高频和阈下强度顺序驱动多个线圈,具有最显著重叠 E 场的区域会产生最大的时间相加效应,从而产生阈上反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Attention demands modulate brain electrical microstates and mental fatigue induced by simulated flight tasks. Temporal attention fusion network with custom loss function for EEG-fNIRS classification. Classification of hand movements from EEG using a FusionNet based LSTM network. Frequency-dependent phase entrainment of cortical cell types during tACS: computational modeling evidence. Patient-specific visual neglect severity estimation for stroke patients with neglect using EEG.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1