Caregiver-specific quality measures for home- and community-based services: Environmental scan and stakeholder priorities.

Polly Hitchcock Noël, Lauren S Penney, Erin P Finley, Julie Parish, Jacqueline A Pugh, Roxana E Delgado, Kimberly S Peacock, Stuti Dang, Ranak Trivedi, Erin D Bouldin, Mary J Pugh, Randall W Rupper, Andrea Kalvesmaki, Luci K Leykum
{"title":"Caregiver-specific quality measures for home- and community-based services: Environmental scan and stakeholder priorities.","authors":"Polly Hitchcock Noël, Lauren S Penney, Erin P Finley, Julie Parish, Jacqueline A Pugh, Roxana E Delgado, Kimberly S Peacock, Stuti Dang, Ranak Trivedi, Erin D Bouldin, Mary J Pugh, Randall W Rupper, Andrea Kalvesmaki, Luci K Leykum","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although family caregivers are increasingly recognized for their essential role in helping vulnerable adults live in the community for as long as possible, their priorities and perspectives have not been well-integrated into quality assessments of home- and community-based services (HCBS). Our overall goal was to identify measurement gaps to guide monitoring and improve HCBS. Caregiver-specific measurement priorities were identified during a multi-level stakeholder engagement process that included 34 Veterans, 24 caregivers, and 39 facility leaders, clinicians, and staff across four VA healthcare systems. We mapped items from national quality measure sets for HCBS identified during an environmental scan onto the stakeholder-identified measurement priorities. Only 5 of 11 non-VA measure sets and three of four VA measure sets explicitly included caregiver-specific items that were aligned with or relevant to stakeholders' measurement priorities. Six of 14 stakeholder-identified priorities were not reflected in any measure sets, such as those that explicitly assess caregiver-reported experience with services that directly or indirectly support their role as caregivers within HCBS. Although family caregivers fulfill a critical role in helping adults with complex medical needs live independently for as long as possible, their priorities and perspectives have not been well-integrated into quality assessments of HCBS. Measures that acknowledge caregivers' roles and incorporate their priorities can help healthcare systems to better monitor and improve HCBS quality, thereby enabling Veterans to remain in the community as long as possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although family caregivers are increasingly recognized for their essential role in helping vulnerable adults live in the community for as long as possible, their priorities and perspectives have not been well-integrated into quality assessments of home- and community-based services (HCBS). Our overall goal was to identify measurement gaps to guide monitoring and improve HCBS. Caregiver-specific measurement priorities were identified during a multi-level stakeholder engagement process that included 34 Veterans, 24 caregivers, and 39 facility leaders, clinicians, and staff across four VA healthcare systems. We mapped items from national quality measure sets for HCBS identified during an environmental scan onto the stakeholder-identified measurement priorities. Only 5 of 11 non-VA measure sets and three of four VA measure sets explicitly included caregiver-specific items that were aligned with or relevant to stakeholders' measurement priorities. Six of 14 stakeholder-identified priorities were not reflected in any measure sets, such as those that explicitly assess caregiver-reported experience with services that directly or indirectly support their role as caregivers within HCBS. Although family caregivers fulfill a critical role in helping adults with complex medical needs live independently for as long as possible, their priorities and perspectives have not been well-integrated into quality assessments of HCBS. Measures that acknowledge caregivers' roles and incorporate their priorities can help healthcare systems to better monitor and improve HCBS quality, thereby enabling Veterans to remain in the community as long as possible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对家庭和社区服务的护理人员质量措施:环境扫描和利益相关者的优先事项。
尽管家庭照护者在帮助弱势成人尽可能长久地生活在社区中的重要作用日益得到认可,但他们的优先事项和观点尚未被很好地纳入家庭和社区服务(HCBS)的质量评估中。我们的总体目标是找出衡量差距,以指导监督和改进 HCBS。在多层次的利益相关者参与过程中,我们确定了护理人员特定的衡量优先事项,其中包括 34 名退伍军人、24 名护理人员以及四个退伍军人医疗保健系统中的 39 名机构领导、临床医生和工作人员。我们将环境扫描过程中确定的全国性医护人员保健服务(HCBS)质量测量集中的项目与利益相关者确定的测量重点进行了映射。在 11 套非退伍军人医疗保健措施中,只有 5 套和 4 套退伍军人医疗保健措施中的 3 套明确包含了与利益相关者的衡量重点一致或相关的护理人员特定项目。在 14 个利益相关者确定的优先事项中,有 6 个没有反映在任何措施集中,例如那些明确评估照护者报告的、直接或间接支持其在 HCBS 中作为照护者角色的服务经验的措施。尽管家庭照护者在帮助有复杂医疗需求的成年人尽可能长时间地独立生活方面发挥着重要作用,但他们的优先事项和观点并未被很好地纳入到对 HCBS 的质量评估中。承认照护者的作用并纳入其优先考虑事项的措施可以帮助医疗保健系统更好地监控和改善 HCBS 的质量,从而使退伍军人尽可能长时间地留在社区中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
The art of aging gracefully. Factors associated with language concordant cognitive testing among linguistically diverse older adults. Denosumab for osteoporosis in older adults in long-term care: A randomized trial. Change in frailty among older COVID-19 survivors. Stress tests and biomarkers of resilience: Proceedings of the second state of resilience science conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1