National Surgical Quality Improvement Program audit of contemporary perioperative care for radical cystectomy.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BJU International Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1111/bju.16492
John Pfail, Jasmin Capellan, Rachel Passarelli, Alain Kaldany, Kevin Chua, Benjamin Lichtbroun, Arnav Srivastava, David Golombos, Thomas L Jang, Henry A Pitt, Vignesh T Packiam, Saum Ghodoussipour
{"title":"National Surgical Quality Improvement Program audit of contemporary perioperative care for radical cystectomy.","authors":"John Pfail, Jasmin Capellan, Rachel Passarelli, Alain Kaldany, Kevin Chua, Benjamin Lichtbroun, Arnav Srivastava, David Golombos, Thomas L Jang, Henry A Pitt, Vignesh T Packiam, Saum Ghodoussipour","doi":"10.1111/bju.16492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the impact of increased compliance to contemporary perioperative care measures, as outlined by enhanced recover after surgery (ERAS) guidelines, among patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database we captured patients undergoing RC between 2019 and 2021. We identified five perioperative care measures: regional anaesthesia block, thromboembolism prophylaxis, ≤24 h perioperative antibiotic administration, absence of bowel preparation, and early oral diet. We stratified patients by the number of measures utilised (one to five). Statistical endpoints included 30-day complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and optimal RC outcome. Optimal RC outcome was defined as absence of any postoperative complication, re-operation, prolonged LOS (75th percentile, 8 days) with no readmission. Multivariable regressions with Bonferroni correction were performed to assess the association between use of contemporary perioperative care measures and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3702 patients who underwent RC, 73 (2%), 417 (11%), 1010 (27%), 1454 (39%), and 748 (20%) received one, two, three, four, and five interventions, respectively. On multivariable analysis, increased perioperative care measures were associated with lower odds of any complication (odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 99% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-0.73), and shorter LOS (β -0.82, 99% CI -0.99 to -0.65). Furthermore, patients with increased compliance to contemporary care measures had increased odds of an optimal outcome (OR 1.38, 99% CI 1.26-1.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the measures we assessed, greater adherence yielded improved postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing RC. Our work supports the efficacy of ERAS protocols in reducing the morbidity associated with RC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the impact of increased compliance to contemporary perioperative care measures, as outlined by enhanced recover after surgery (ERAS) guidelines, among patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC).

Patients and methods: From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database we captured patients undergoing RC between 2019 and 2021. We identified five perioperative care measures: regional anaesthesia block, thromboembolism prophylaxis, ≤24 h perioperative antibiotic administration, absence of bowel preparation, and early oral diet. We stratified patients by the number of measures utilised (one to five). Statistical endpoints included 30-day complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and optimal RC outcome. Optimal RC outcome was defined as absence of any postoperative complication, re-operation, prolonged LOS (75th percentile, 8 days) with no readmission. Multivariable regressions with Bonferroni correction were performed to assess the association between use of contemporary perioperative care measures and outcomes.

Results: Of the 3702 patients who underwent RC, 73 (2%), 417 (11%), 1010 (27%), 1454 (39%), and 748 (20%) received one, two, three, four, and five interventions, respectively. On multivariable analysis, increased perioperative care measures were associated with lower odds of any complication (odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 99% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-0.73), and shorter LOS (β -0.82, 99% CI -0.99 to -0.65). Furthermore, patients with increased compliance to contemporary care measures had increased odds of an optimal outcome (OR 1.38, 99% CI 1.26-1.51).

Conclusions: Among the measures we assessed, greater adherence yielded improved postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing RC. Our work supports the efficacy of ERAS protocols in reducing the morbidity associated with RC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家外科质量改进计划对根治性膀胱切除术的当代围手术期护理进行审核。
目的研究在接受根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的患者中加强遵守术后恢复(ERAS)指南所概述的现代围手术期护理措施的影响:我们从国家外科质量改进计划数据库中收集了 2019 年至 2021 年期间接受根治性膀胱切除术的患者。我们确定了五项围手术期护理措施:区域麻醉阻滞、血栓栓塞预防、围手术期抗生素用药≤24 h、无肠道准备和早期口服饮食。我们根据采用措施的数量(1 至 5 项)对患者进行了分层。统计终点包括 30 天并发症、住院时间(LOS)、再入院率和最佳 RC 结果。最佳 RC 结果定义为无任何术后并发症、再次手术、住院时间延长(第 75 百分位数,8 天)且无再次入院。采用Bonferroni校正进行多变量回归,以评估现代围手术期护理措施的使用与结果之间的关联:在接受 RC 的 3702 名患者中,分别有 73 人(2%)、417 人(11%)、1010 人(27%)、1454 人(39%)和 748 人(20%)接受了一项、两项、三项、四项和五项干预措施。通过多变量分析,围手术期护理措施的增加与任何并发症的发生几率降低(几率比 [OR] 0.66,99% 置信区间 [CI] 0.6-0.73)和 LOS 缩短(β -0.82,99% CI -0.99--0.65)有关。此外,患者对现代护理措施的依从性越高,获得最佳结果的几率就越大(OR 1.38,99% CI 1.26-1.51):结论:在我们评估的措施中,更严格遵守这些措施可改善接受 RC 患者的术后效果。我们的研究支持 ERAS 方案在降低 RC 相关发病率方面的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
期刊最新文献
A luminal non-coding RNA-based genomic classifier confirms favourable outcomes in patients with clinically organ-confined bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. Unravelling the evolution of medical scientific publishing to hold the promise of science for better patient care. An international multicentre randomised controlled trial of en bloc resection of bladder tumour vs conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumour: first results of the en bloc resection of urothelium carcinoma of the bladder (EBRUC) II trial Mortality rates in radical cystectomy patients with bladder cancer after radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Cumulative re‐operation rates during follow‐up after hypospadias repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1