Reducing Apical Bacterial Extrusion: The Impact of Reciproc File Size and Irrigation Technique.

Q3 Dentistry Iranian Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Maricel Rosario Cardenas Cuellar, Thais Cristina Pereira, Layla Reginna Silva Munhoz de Vasconcelos, Victor Feliz Pedrinha, Rodrigo Ricci Vivan, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte, Flaviana Bombarda de Andrade
{"title":"Reducing Apical Bacterial Extrusion: The Impact of Reciproc File Size and Irrigation Technique.","authors":"Maricel Rosario Cardenas Cuellar, Thais Cristina Pereira, Layla Reginna Silva Munhoz de Vasconcelos, Victor Feliz Pedrinha, Rodrigo Ricci Vivan, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte, Flaviana Bombarda de Andrade","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study used different irrigation techniques to compare the levels of apical bacterial extrusion during the preparation of root canals with a reciprocating instrument widely used in endodontics, the Reciproc files 25/0.08 and 40/0.06.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The irrigation techniques employed were conventional syringe irrigation and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI); the latter, with one or two activation cycles. Seventy extracted mandibular human premolars were contaminated with <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> for 5 days and were distributed into 6 experimental groups (<i>n</i>=10), and the remaining specimens were used as positive and negative control groups (<i>n</i>=5). Group 1: instrumentation performed with Reciproc 25/0.08 and conventional syringe irrigation; Group 2: instrumentation performed with Reciproc 25/0.08 along with PUI for one minute after instrumentation (PUI-1); and Group 3: instrumentation performed with Reciproc 25/0.08 along with PUI for one minute before and after instrumentation (PUI-2). Groups 4, 5 and 6 were instrumented with Reciproc 40/0.06, and irrigation was performed similar to the previous groups, in the aforementioned order. Each root canal was irrigated with saline solution. Extruded debris was collected in microtubes. The contents of the microtubes were homogenized, diluted, and spread on Brain Heart Infusion agar. After 48 hours, the number of colony-forming units was determined for each sample. For statistical analysis, the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn's tests were used (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CFU/mL count indicated that the instrumentation with Reciproc 25/0.08 was associated with the highest bacterial extrusion, mainly when PUI was performed (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All the instrumentation techniques caused bacterial extrusion through the apical foramen; however, the largest file size of the Reciproc 40/0.06 groups was associated with less apical bacterial extrusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":14534,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Endodontic Journal","volume":"19 3","pages":"176-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study used different irrigation techniques to compare the levels of apical bacterial extrusion during the preparation of root canals with a reciprocating instrument widely used in endodontics, the Reciproc files 25/0.08 and 40/0.06.

Materials and methods: The irrigation techniques employed were conventional syringe irrigation and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI); the latter, with one or two activation cycles. Seventy extracted mandibular human premolars were contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis for 5 days and were distributed into 6 experimental groups (n=10), and the remaining specimens were used as positive and negative control groups (n=5). Group 1: instrumentation performed with Reciproc 25/0.08 and conventional syringe irrigation; Group 2: instrumentation performed with Reciproc 25/0.08 along with PUI for one minute after instrumentation (PUI-1); and Group 3: instrumentation performed with Reciproc 25/0.08 along with PUI for one minute before and after instrumentation (PUI-2). Groups 4, 5 and 6 were instrumented with Reciproc 40/0.06, and irrigation was performed similar to the previous groups, in the aforementioned order. Each root canal was irrigated with saline solution. Extruded debris was collected in microtubes. The contents of the microtubes were homogenized, diluted, and spread on Brain Heart Infusion agar. After 48 hours, the number of colony-forming units was determined for each sample. For statistical analysis, the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn's tests were used (α=0.05).

Results: The CFU/mL count indicated that the instrumentation with Reciproc 25/0.08 was associated with the highest bacterial extrusion, mainly when PUI was performed (P<0.05).

Conclusion: All the instrumentation techniques caused bacterial extrusion through the apical foramen; however, the largest file size of the Reciproc 40/0.06 groups was associated with less apical bacterial extrusion.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少根尖细菌挤压:Riproc文件大小和灌溉技术的影响
导言:本研究使用不同的灌洗技术,比较了在根管治疗中广泛使用的往复式器械(Reciproc锉25/0.08和40/0.06)制备根管过程中根尖细菌挤出的程度:采用的灌洗技术有传统的注射器灌洗和被动超声波灌洗(PUI);后者有一个或两个激活周期。将 70 颗拔出的下颌人类前臼齿用粪肠球菌污染 5 天,分成 6 个实验组(n=10),其余标本作为阳性对照组和阴性对照组(n=5)。第 1 组:使用 Reciproc 25/0.08 和常规注射器灌洗进行器械检查;第 2 组:使用 Reciproc 25/0.08 进行器械检查,并在器械检查后进行一分钟的 PUI(PUI-1);第 3 组:使用 Reciproc 25/0.08 进行器械检查,并在器械检查前后进行一分钟的 PUI(PUI-2)。第 4、5 和 6 组使用 Reciproc 40/0.06 进行器械操作,灌洗的顺序与前几组类似。每个根管都用生理盐水冲洗。将挤出的碎屑收集在微管中。将微管内容物均质、稀释并涂抹在脑心输液琼脂上。48 小时后,测定每个样本的菌落形成单位数。统计分析采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Dunn 检验(α=0.05):结果:CFU/mL计数显示,使用Reciproc 25/0.08进行器械操作时,细菌挤出量最高,主要是在进行PUI操作时(PC结论:所有器械操作技术都会造成细菌挤出:所有器械技术都会导致细菌从根尖孔挤出;但Reciproc 40/0.06组的锉刀尺寸最大,根尖细菌挤出较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Endodontic Journal
Iranian Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Endodontic Journal (IEJ) is an international peer-reviewed biomedical publication, the aim of which is to provide a scientific medium of communication for researchers throughout the globe. IEJ aims to publish the highest quality articles, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Endodontics. The journal is an official Journal of the Iranian Center for Endodontic Research (ICER) and the Iranian Association of Endodontists (IAE). The Journal welcomes articles related to the scientific or applied aspects of endodontics e.g. original researches, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, review articles, clinical trials, case series/reports, hypotheses, letters to the editor, etc. From the beginning (i.e. since 2006), the IEJ was the first open access endodontic journal in the world, which gave readers free and instant access to published articles and enabling them faster discovery of the latest endodontic research.
期刊最新文献
Sodium Hypochlorite-induced Facial Hematoma Following Root Canal Treatment. Successful Management of a Typical Class 3 Invasive Cervical Root Resorption with Modified Pulpotomy: A Case Report. Assessing the Impact of Mandibular Molar Root Length on Success in Supplemental Intraligamentary Injection for Irreversible Pulpitis. Comparative Analysis of Photosensitizer Penetration Depth in Root Canal Debridement for Endodontic Disinfection. Comparative Outcomes of Pulpotomy in Mature Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Non-Randomized Trial Evaluating Calcified and Non-Calcified Pulp Chambers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1