The Continuing Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Diabetic Retinopathy Screenings.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1080/09286586.2024.2372045
Evan Bilsbury, Marina Mautner Wizentier, Emma Wood, Sean Doherty, James Ledwith, Juan Ding
{"title":"The Continuing Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Diabetic Retinopathy Screenings.","authors":"Evan Bilsbury, Marina Mautner Wizentier, Emma Wood, Sean Doherty, James Ledwith, Juan Ding","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2024.2372045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective observational study of health claims data seeks to quantify the prolonged impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on DR screening rates in central Massachusetts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective claims data from the UMass Memorial Managed Care Network were collected for the years of 2018-2022. Comprehensive and DR screening exams were identified using CPT codes for patients with diabetes. Data were derived from claims submitted by the UMass Memorial Managed Care network to four insurance programs via CPT billing code for comprehensive and DR screening exams for patients with diabetes. Over one million claims for the years 01/2018-05/2022 were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a significant decrease in unadjusted DR screening rates in the post-lockdown period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Bivariate analysis revealed a 15.1% decrease in weekly DR screenings during post-lockdown (RR = 0.849, 95% CI = 0.811, 0.888). After adjusting for seasonal variation, the mean weekly DR screening rate was 12% lower in the post-lockdown period, with a 95% CI of 6.1% to 17.5% decrease (Adjusted RR = 0.880, 95% CI = 0.825, 0.939 Stratified analysis based on patient status revealed a significant decrease in adjusted DR screening rates for established patients post-lockdown compared to pre-pandemic (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), while no significant difference was observed for new patients (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The impact of COVID-19 on DR screening and treatment rates persisted even after the resumption of non-essential care services, with a discrepancy between new and established patients. Future research should work to identify and overcome the barriers to DR screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2372045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective observational study of health claims data seeks to quantify the prolonged impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on DR screening rates in central Massachusetts.

Methods: Retrospective claims data from the UMass Memorial Managed Care Network were collected for the years of 2018-2022. Comprehensive and DR screening exams were identified using CPT codes for patients with diabetes. Data were derived from claims submitted by the UMass Memorial Managed Care network to four insurance programs via CPT billing code for comprehensive and DR screening exams for patients with diabetes. Over one million claims for the years 01/2018-05/2022 were collected.

Results: We found a significant decrease in unadjusted DR screening rates in the post-lockdown period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period (p < 0.001). Bivariate analysis revealed a 15.1% decrease in weekly DR screenings during post-lockdown (RR = 0.849, 95% CI = 0.811, 0.888). After adjusting for seasonal variation, the mean weekly DR screening rate was 12% lower in the post-lockdown period, with a 95% CI of 6.1% to 17.5% decrease (Adjusted RR = 0.880, 95% CI = 0.825, 0.939 Stratified analysis based on patient status revealed a significant decrease in adjusted DR screening rates for established patients post-lockdown compared to pre-pandemic (p < 0.0001), while no significant difference was observed for new patients (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The impact of COVID-19 on DR screening and treatment rates persisted even after the resumption of non-essential care services, with a discrepancy between new and established patients. Future research should work to identify and overcome the barriers to DR screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行对糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的持续影响。
目的:这项健康索赔数据回顾性观察研究旨在量化 COVID-19 大流行对马萨诸塞州中部地区 DR 筛查率的长期影响:从马萨诸塞大学纪念管理式医疗网络收集了 2018-2022 年的回顾性索赔数据。使用糖尿病患者的 CPT 编码确定了综合检查和 DR 筛查检查。数据来源于马萨诸塞大学纪念医院管理式医疗网络通过 CPT 账单代码向四项保险计划提交的糖尿病患者综合筛查和 DR 筛查的理赔申请。我们收集了超过 100 万份 01/2018-05/2022 年的报销单:我们发现,与 COVID-19 前相比,COVID-19 后未调整的 DR 筛查率明显下降(P P > 0.05):结论:COVID-19 对 DR 筛查和治疗率的影响在非必要医疗服务恢复后依然存在,新患者和老患者之间存在差异。未来的研究应致力于识别和克服 DR 筛查的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
期刊最新文献
The Burden of Blindness and Vision Impairment in the Middle East and North Africa: A Global Burden of Disease 2019 Perspective. A Cross-Sectional Study of Demographic Representativeness of Glaucoma Patient Populations in Clinical Trials from 2006 to 2022. Exploring the Associations of Obesity and Glycemic Traits with Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Univariate and Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Study. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Diversity and Representation in Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Trials in the U.S. Impact of Ambient Air Pollution on Reduced Visual Acuity Among Children and Adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1