The impact of disability on recruitment to higher surgical specialty training: A retrospective cohort study

Ricky Ellis , Yasin Al-Tawarah , Peter A. Brennan , Amanda J. Lee , John Hines , Duncan SG. Scrimgeour , Jennifer Cleland
{"title":"The impact of disability on recruitment to higher surgical specialty training: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Ricky Ellis ,&nbsp;Yasin Al-Tawarah ,&nbsp;Peter A. Brennan ,&nbsp;Amanda J. Lee ,&nbsp;John Hines ,&nbsp;Duncan SG. Scrimgeour ,&nbsp;Jennifer Cleland","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>UK examining bodies are required to eliminate discrimination against people with protected characteristics. To achieve this in surgery, differential attainment (DA) in assessments used as gatekeepers to career progression must be ruled out. This study investigated the impact of disability status on the likelihood of success at national selection for Higher Surgical Training (HST).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study of all UK graduates in the UKMED database (<span><span>https://www.ukmed.ac.uk</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) who underwent selection for HST (ST3) from 2012 to 2019 (<em>n</em> = 2875). Univariate analysis identified differences in success rates at first-application. Logistic regression models identified whether disability was a predictor of success after adjusting for sociodemographic factors and prior MRCS performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was no significant difference in success rates between candidates with and without disabilities (all p &gt; 0.05) for any surgical specialty. Disability status was not a statistically significant predictor of success. Female candidates were 25 % more likely to be successful (OR 1.25 [95%CI 1.05 to 1.49]) and Non-White candidates were 20 % less likely to be successful (OR 0.80 [95%CI 0.68 to 0.96]). Candidates who passed MRCS Part A and Part B at the first attempt were 49 % (OR 1.49 [95%CI 1.25 to 1.77]) and 90 % (OR 1.90 [95%CI 1.58 to 2.28]) more likely to be successful.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>No significant difference was found in the likelihood of being successful at HST selection for any surgical specialty between applicants with and without disabilities, regardless of type of disability. DA was identified between other sociodemographic groups which requires further exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":"22 6","pages":"Pages 344-351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

UK examining bodies are required to eliminate discrimination against people with protected characteristics. To achieve this in surgery, differential attainment (DA) in assessments used as gatekeepers to career progression must be ruled out. This study investigated the impact of disability status on the likelihood of success at national selection for Higher Surgical Training (HST).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of all UK graduates in the UKMED database (https://www.ukmed.ac.uk) who underwent selection for HST (ST3) from 2012 to 2019 (n = 2875). Univariate analysis identified differences in success rates at first-application. Logistic regression models identified whether disability was a predictor of success after adjusting for sociodemographic factors and prior MRCS performance.

Results

There was no significant difference in success rates between candidates with and without disabilities (all p > 0.05) for any surgical specialty. Disability status was not a statistically significant predictor of success. Female candidates were 25 % more likely to be successful (OR 1.25 [95%CI 1.05 to 1.49]) and Non-White candidates were 20 % less likely to be successful (OR 0.80 [95%CI 0.68 to 0.96]). Candidates who passed MRCS Part A and Part B at the first attempt were 49 % (OR 1.49 [95%CI 1.25 to 1.77]) and 90 % (OR 1.90 [95%CI 1.58 to 2.28]) more likely to be successful.

Conclusion

No significant difference was found in the likelihood of being successful at HST selection for any surgical specialty between applicants with and without disabilities, regardless of type of disability. DA was identified between other sociodemographic groups which requires further exploration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残疾对高等外科专业培训招生的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:英国考试机构必须消除对受保护特征人群的歧视。要在外科领域实现这一目标,就必须在作为职业晋升门槛的评估中排除差异化成绩(DA)。本研究调查了残疾状况对成功通过国家高级外科培训(HST)选拔的可能性的影响:回顾性队列研究的对象是英国医学发展数据库(https://www.ukmed.ac.uk)中所有在2012年至2019年期间接受高等外科培训(ST3)选拔的英国毕业生(n = 2875)。单变量分析确定了首次申请成功率的差异。逻辑回归模型确定了在调整社会人口因素和之前的 MRCS 成绩后,残疾是否是成功的预测因素:结果:在任何外科专业中,有残疾和无残疾候选人的成功率都没有明显差异(均 p > 0.05)。残疾状况对成功率的预测没有统计学意义。女性考生的成功率要高 25%(OR 1.25 [95%CI 1.05 至 1.49]),而非白人考生的成功率要低 20%(OR 0.80 [95%CI 0.68 至 0.96])。首次通过 MRCS A 部分和 B 部分考试的考生成功的可能性分别为 49% (OR 1.49 [95%CI 1.25 to 1.77])和 90% (OR 1.90 [95%CI 1.58 to 2.28]):结论:无论残疾类型如何,有残疾和无残疾的申请者在成功通过HST外科专科遴选的可能性方面均无明显差异。在其他社会人口组别之间也发现了DA,这需要进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
期刊最新文献
Enhancements in artificial intelligence for medical examinations: A leap from ChatGPT 3.5 to ChatGPT 4.0 in the FRCS trauma & orthopaedics examination. A boost to concentration or a distracting noise? A systematic review of surgeon and anaesthetist perspectives of the benefit of intra-operative music. List of editors Surgeon ability to predict physical activity and sedentary time: Comparison of self-reported and measured activity Sensitivity and specificity of surgeons' intra-operative diagnosis of appendicitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1