Clinical evaluation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic resin-based sealants in uncooperative children: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.22514/jocpd.2024.088
Hussein Alharthy, Heba Elkhodary, Alaa Nahdreen, Amani Al Tuwirqi, Khlood Baghlaf, Najlaa Alamoudi
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic resin-based sealants in uncooperative children: a randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Hussein Alharthy, Heba Elkhodary, Alaa Nahdreen, Amani Al Tuwirqi, Khlood Baghlaf, Najlaa Alamoudi","doi":"10.22514/jocpd.2024.088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This clinical trial aimed to evaluate and compare the retention and cariostatic effects of hydrophilic and hydrophobic resin-based sealants (RBSs) for sealing pits and fissures in the permanent molars of uncooperative children. A split-mouth and double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted among 6- to 9-year-old uncooperative children. One hundred and four sound mandibular and maxillary first permanent molars were randomly allocated to be sealed with group I (UltraSeal XT® hydro™) or group II (Helioseal-F) in 34 uncooperative children. Clinical evaluation was performed by two investigators using the Color, Coverage and Caries system to assess sealant retention and cariostatic effect at 3-, 6- and 12-month intervals. Data analysis was performed using Friedman's and Mann-Whitney U tests. The final analysis included 31 children with 49 pairs of teeth. No significant differences were observed between the retention and cariostatic effects of hydrophilic and hydrophobic RBSs at the 3-, 6- and 12-month intervals (<i>p</i> = 0.23, <i>p</i> = 0.638, and <i>p</i> = 0.706, respectively) (<i>p</i> = 0.175, <i>p</i> = 0.065, and <i>p</i> = 0.171, respectively). After 12 months of follow-up, the hydrophilic RBSs showed an outcome equivalent to that of conventional hydrophobic RBSs in terms of retention and cariostatic effects. Therefore, hydrophilic RBSs could be considered as the sealing material of choice when isolation is difficult, particularly in uncooperative children.</p>","PeriodicalId":50235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/jocpd.2024.088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This clinical trial aimed to evaluate and compare the retention and cariostatic effects of hydrophilic and hydrophobic resin-based sealants (RBSs) for sealing pits and fissures in the permanent molars of uncooperative children. A split-mouth and double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted among 6- to 9-year-old uncooperative children. One hundred and four sound mandibular and maxillary first permanent molars were randomly allocated to be sealed with group I (UltraSeal XT® hydro™) or group II (Helioseal-F) in 34 uncooperative children. Clinical evaluation was performed by two investigators using the Color, Coverage and Caries system to assess sealant retention and cariostatic effect at 3-, 6- and 12-month intervals. Data analysis was performed using Friedman's and Mann-Whitney U tests. The final analysis included 31 children with 49 pairs of teeth. No significant differences were observed between the retention and cariostatic effects of hydrophilic and hydrophobic RBSs at the 3-, 6- and 12-month intervals (p = 0.23, p = 0.638, and p = 0.706, respectively) (p = 0.175, p = 0.065, and p = 0.171, respectively). After 12 months of follow-up, the hydrophilic RBSs showed an outcome equivalent to that of conventional hydrophobic RBSs in terms of retention and cariostatic effects. Therefore, hydrophilic RBSs could be considered as the sealing material of choice when isolation is difficult, particularly in uncooperative children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲水性和疏水性树脂密封剂在不合作儿童中的临床评估:随机对照临床试验。
这项临床试验旨在评估和比较亲水性树脂封闭剂和疏水性树脂封闭剂(RBSs)在封闭不合作儿童恒磨牙凹陷和裂隙时的固位和抗龋效果。我们在 6 至 9 岁不合作的儿童中开展了一项分口双盲随机临床试验(RCT)。在 34 名不合作的儿童中随机分配了 14 颗健全的下颌和上颌第一恒磨牙,分别使用第一组(UltraSeal XT® hydro™)或第二组(Helioseal-F)进行封闭。由两名研究人员使用颜色、覆盖率和龋坏系统进行临床评估,在3个月、6个月和12个月的时间间隔内评估密封剂的保持力和防龋效果。数据分析采用弗里德曼检验和曼-惠特尼 U 检验。最终分析包括 31 名儿童的 49 对牙齿。在 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的间隔期内,亲水性和疏水性 RBS 的固位和抗龋效果没有明显差异(分别为 p = 0.23、p = 0.638 和 p = 0.706)(分别为 p = 0.175、p = 0.065 和 p = 0.171)。经过 12 个月的随访,亲水性 RBS 在保留和止血效果方面的结果与传统的疏水性 RBS 相当。因此,亲水性 RBS 可作为隔离困难时的首选密封材料,尤其是对于不合作的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The purpose of The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry is to provide clinically relevant information to enable the practicing dentist to have access to the state of the art in pediatric dentistry. From prevention, to information, to the management of different problems encountered in children''s related medical and dental problems, this peer-reviewed journal keeps you abreast of the latest news and developments related to pediatric dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Segmental root development of immature necrotic permanent teeth following regenerative endodontic procedures: a case series. Sleep bruxism in children main methods of treatment: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Temporal variation in the oral microbiome and the prediction of early childhood caries in different ethnicities. The impact of clinical audit on antibiotic prescribing in dental practice at Taibah University Dental Hospital. A severely damaged premolar tooth restored with coronal pulpotomy and a 3D-printed endocrown.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1