Structural Brain Differences in the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum: Insights Into the Heterogeneity From a Large Multisite Neuroimaging Consortium.

Tavia E Evans, Natalia Vilor-Tejedor, Gregory Operto, Carles Falcon, Albert Hofman, Agustin Ibáñez, Sudha Seshadari, Louis C S Tan, Michael Weiner, Suverna Alladi, Udunna Anazodo, Juan Domingo Gispert, Hieab H H Adams
{"title":"Structural Brain Differences in the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum: Insights Into the Heterogeneity From a Large Multisite Neuroimaging Consortium.","authors":"Tavia E Evans, Natalia Vilor-Tejedor, Gregory Operto, Carles Falcon, Albert Hofman, Agustin Ibáñez, Sudha Seshadari, Louis C S Tan, Michael Weiner, Suverna Alladi, Udunna Anazodo, Juan Domingo Gispert, Hieab H H Adams","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.07.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neurodegenerative diseases require collaborative, multisite research to comprehensively grasp their complex and diverse pathological progression; however, there is caution in aggregating global data due to data heterogeneity. In the current study, we investigated brain structure across stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and how relationships vary across sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 6 international datasets (N > 27,000), associations of structural neuroimaging markers were investigated in relation to the AD continuum via meta-analysis. We investigated whether associations varied across elements of magnetic resonance imaging acquisition, study design, and populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Modest differences in associations were found depending on how data were acquired; however, patterns were similar. Preliminary results suggested that neuroimaging marker-AD relationships differ across ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diversity in data offers unique insights into the neural substrate of AD; however, harmonized processing and transparency of data collection are needed. Global collaborations should embrace the inherent heterogeneity that exists in the data and quantify its contribution to research findings at the meta-analytical stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.07.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neurodegenerative diseases require collaborative, multisite research to comprehensively grasp their complex and diverse pathological progression; however, there is caution in aggregating global data due to data heterogeneity. In the current study, we investigated brain structure across stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and how relationships vary across sources of heterogeneity.

Methods: Using 6 international datasets (N > 27,000), associations of structural neuroimaging markers were investigated in relation to the AD continuum via meta-analysis. We investigated whether associations varied across elements of magnetic resonance imaging acquisition, study design, and populations.

Results: Modest differences in associations were found depending on how data were acquired; however, patterns were similar. Preliminary results suggested that neuroimaging marker-AD relationships differ across ethnic groups.

Conclusions: Diversity in data offers unique insights into the neural substrate of AD; however, harmonized processing and transparency of data collection are needed. Global collaborations should embrace the inherent heterogeneity that exists in the data and quantify its contribution to research findings at the meta-analytical stage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔茨海默氏症连续症的大脑结构差异:从大型多站点神经成像联盟中洞察异质性。
导言:神经退行性疾病需要多机构合作研究才能全面掌握其复杂多样的病理发展过程,但由于数据的异质性,在汇总全球数据时需要谨慎。本研究调查了阿尔茨海默病(AD)各阶段的大脑结构,以及不同异质性来源之间的关系:利用 6 个国际数据集(n>27,000),通过荟萃分析研究了神经影像结构标记与阿尔茨海默病连续性的关联。我们研究了磁共振成像采集、研究设计和人群等因素之间的关联是否存在差异:结果:根据数据获取方式的不同,相关性略有不同,但模式相似。初步结果表明,不同种族群体的神经影像标记物与AD的关系存在差异:讨论:数据的多样性为了解 AD 的神经基质提供了独特的视角,但数据收集的统一处理和透明度仍有待提高。全球合作应接受数据中存在的固有异质性,并在荟萃分析阶段量化其对研究结果的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hypoactivation of ventromedial frontal cortex in major depressive disorder: an MEG study of the Reward Positivity. Aperiodic (1/f) neural activity robustly tracks symptom severity changes in treatment-resistant depression. Increased Amygdala Activation during Symptom Provocation Predicts Response to Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Exposure Therapy in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Decoding mindfulness with multivariate predictive models. The reward positivity as a predictor of first lifetime onsets of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in high-risk adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1