Pub Date : 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.12.002
Nadia Bibb, Kait Meek, Raquel Kosted, Skyler Lee, Jorge R C Almeida, Elizabeth T C Lippard
Background: Bipolar disorder coincides with one of the highest rates of suicide out of all psychiatric conditions. Individual differences in stress reactivity may contribute to increased susceptibility to suicide-related thoughts and behaviors (STBs). Research examining stress response and relations with STBs in bipolar disorder is limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between recent perceived stress and neurophysiological response to acute psychosocial stress in anterior-paralimbic system in young adults with bipolar disorder with and without suicide attempt history.
Methods: Seventy-two young adults (22 with bipolar disorder and history of suicide attempt(s) [BD-SA], 21 diagnostic controls without suicide attempt history [BD-noSA], 29 typically developing [TD]) were assessed for past-month perceived stress (PSS) and completed a fMRI stress math task. Stress-related functional changes in anterior-paralimbic regions of interest were examined in relation to PSS. Effects of lifetime alcohol/cannabis use disorder and nicotine use on stress reactivity were explored.
Results: In BD-SA young adults, recent perceived stress was associated with greater reactivity to psychosocial stress in the medial orbitofrontal cortex, anterior insula, amygdala, and anterior cingulate cortex (group-by-PSS interactions: p's<0.008). These patterns were not observed in the BD-noSA or TD groups. Lifetime CUD and recent nicotine use related to greater anterior-paralimbic responses to stress in bipolar disorder (p's<0.002).
Conclusions: Heightened anterior-paralimbic reactivity to cumulative stress may represent a risk factor for STBs. Cannabis and nicotine use may exacerbate stress-related anterior-paralimbic dysregulation. Future longitudinal research is needed to extend findings and investigate temporal relations between stress reactivity, cannabis/nicotine use, and STBs.
{"title":"Recent Stress Potentiation and Paralimbic System Reactivity in Young Adults with Bipolar Disorder: Implications for Suicide Risk and Effects of Cannabis Use Disorder.","authors":"Nadia Bibb, Kait Meek, Raquel Kosted, Skyler Lee, Jorge R C Almeida, Elizabeth T C Lippard","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.12.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bipolar disorder coincides with one of the highest rates of suicide out of all psychiatric conditions. Individual differences in stress reactivity may contribute to increased susceptibility to suicide-related thoughts and behaviors (STBs). Research examining stress response and relations with STBs in bipolar disorder is limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between recent perceived stress and neurophysiological response to acute psychosocial stress in anterior-paralimbic system in young adults with bipolar disorder with and without suicide attempt history.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-two young adults (22 with bipolar disorder and history of suicide attempt(s) [BD-SA], 21 diagnostic controls without suicide attempt history [BD-noSA], 29 typically developing [TD]) were assessed for past-month perceived stress (PSS) and completed a fMRI stress math task. Stress-related functional changes in anterior-paralimbic regions of interest were examined in relation to PSS. Effects of lifetime alcohol/cannabis use disorder and nicotine use on stress reactivity were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In BD-SA young adults, recent perceived stress was associated with greater reactivity to psychosocial stress in the medial orbitofrontal cortex, anterior insula, amygdala, and anterior cingulate cortex (group-by-PSS interactions: p's<0.008). These patterns were not observed in the BD-noSA or TD groups. Lifetime CUD and recent nicotine use related to greater anterior-paralimbic responses to stress in bipolar disorder (p's<0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Heightened anterior-paralimbic reactivity to cumulative stress may represent a risk factor for STBs. Cannabis and nicotine use may exacerbate stress-related anterior-paralimbic dysregulation. Future longitudinal research is needed to extend findings and investigate temporal relations between stress reactivity, cannabis/nicotine use, and STBs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.12.001
Lorenzo Mattioni, Francesco di Gregorio, Marco Badioli, Claudio Danti, Luigi A E Degni, Gianluca Finotti, Francesca Starita, Giuseppe di Pellegrino, Sara Garofalo
Background: Individual differences in reward learning and motivational processes are reflected in sign-tracking behavior. This phenotype, characterized by heightened attraction to reward-associated cues, is linked to increased impulsivity, addiction vulnerability, and externalizing psychiatric disorders.
Methods: To identify underlying neural differences, we tested whether high sign-tracking individuals exhibit an elevated mid-frontal theta/beta ratio, a resting EEG biomarker indicating reduced cortical control over subcortical motivational circuits. Sixty volunteers completed a 5-minute resting-state EEG session followed by a Pavlovian learning task. Participants were classified into high or low sign-tracking groups based on objective eye-gaze metrics.
Results: High sign-tracking participants demonstrated a significantly higher mid-frontal theta/beta ratio compared to the low sign-tracking group.
Conclusions: These findings identify the mid-frontal theta/beta ratio as a neural marker capable of distinguishing individual differences in reward cue reactivity. This suggests a pathway for targeted interventions aimed at the underlying cortical-subcortical dysregulation associated with sign-tracking and related vulnerabilities.
{"title":"RESTING-STATE THETA/BETA RATIO REVEALS DISTINCT NEURAL SIGNATURES IN HIGH SIGN-TRACKING INDIVIDUALS.","authors":"Lorenzo Mattioni, Francesco di Gregorio, Marco Badioli, Claudio Danti, Luigi A E Degni, Gianluca Finotti, Francesca Starita, Giuseppe di Pellegrino, Sara Garofalo","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.12.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individual differences in reward learning and motivational processes are reflected in sign-tracking behavior. This phenotype, characterized by heightened attraction to reward-associated cues, is linked to increased impulsivity, addiction vulnerability, and externalizing psychiatric disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify underlying neural differences, we tested whether high sign-tracking individuals exhibit an elevated mid-frontal theta/beta ratio, a resting EEG biomarker indicating reduced cortical control over subcortical motivational circuits. Sixty volunteers completed a 5-minute resting-state EEG session followed by a Pavlovian learning task. Participants were classified into high or low sign-tracking groups based on objective eye-gaze metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High sign-tracking participants demonstrated a significantly higher mid-frontal theta/beta ratio compared to the low sign-tracking group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings identify the mid-frontal theta/beta ratio as a neural marker capable of distinguishing individual differences in reward cue reactivity. This suggests a pathway for targeted interventions aimed at the underlying cortical-subcortical dysregulation associated with sign-tracking and related vulnerabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.12.003
Katie L Barlis, Jamie Terner, Nancy X Huynh, Ashley A Huggins
With a rapidly growing population of older adults worldwide, understanding how aging shapes mental and cognitive health is an urgent public health priority. Although older age has been considered protective against the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), this pattern is far from universal. Emerging evidence indicates that older adults with a history of trauma may experience delayed-onset PTSD or a reemergence of symptoms after years of dormancy. In this review, we examine how age-related changes in the brain intersect with known PTSD mechanisms to influence trajectories of risk and resilience in later life. We focus on the canonical fear network-comprising the amygdala, hippocampus, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex-which is central to fear learning, memory, and emotion regulation. These regions are also highly vulnerable to aging and neurodegenerative processes, yet older adults remain underrepresented in both neurobiological and treatment studies of PTSD. We argue that the structural and functional aging of these systems may exacerbate difficulties with associative learning and emotional regulation, while also interacting with psychosocial stressors unique to aging. At the same time, age-related strengths (such as positivity bias) may promote resilience. These insights carry important implications for clinical care: existing empirically-supported psychotherapies may benefit from adaptations to account for age-related neural and cognitive shifts. A lifespan neuroscience framework is essential for identifying shared mechanisms between PTSD and aging, with the goal of informing tailored, mechanism-driven interventions that promote the mental and cognitive health of trauma-exposed older adults.
{"title":"Fear Learning and Memory in the Aging Brain: Neural Mechanisms of PTSD Risk and Resilience in Older Adults.","authors":"Katie L Barlis, Jamie Terner, Nancy X Huynh, Ashley A Huggins","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.12.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With a rapidly growing population of older adults worldwide, understanding how aging shapes mental and cognitive health is an urgent public health priority. Although older age has been considered protective against the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), this pattern is far from universal. Emerging evidence indicates that older adults with a history of trauma may experience delayed-onset PTSD or a reemergence of symptoms after years of dormancy. In this review, we examine how age-related changes in the brain intersect with known PTSD mechanisms to influence trajectories of risk and resilience in later life. We focus on the canonical fear network-comprising the amygdala, hippocampus, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex-which is central to fear learning, memory, and emotion regulation. These regions are also highly vulnerable to aging and neurodegenerative processes, yet older adults remain underrepresented in both neurobiological and treatment studies of PTSD. We argue that the structural and functional aging of these systems may exacerbate difficulties with associative learning and emotional regulation, while also interacting with psychosocial stressors unique to aging. At the same time, age-related strengths (such as positivity bias) may promote resilience. These insights carry important implications for clinical care: existing empirically-supported psychotherapies may benefit from adaptations to account for age-related neural and cognitive shifts. A lifespan neuroscience framework is essential for identifying shared mechanisms between PTSD and aging, with the goal of informing tailored, mechanism-driven interventions that promote the mental and cognitive health of trauma-exposed older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145758772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.010
Adrienne L Romer, Garrett Hosterman, Poornima Kumar, Diego A Pizzagalli
Background: Accumulating evidence points to the cerebellum's role in executive functioning (EF) and transdiagnostic psychopathology. A general psychopathology 'p-factor,' capturing shared variation across mental disorders, has been associated with EF deficits and structural alterations within the posterior cerebellum. One hypothesis is that the cerebellum contributes to general psychopathology because of its role in executive dysfunctions.
Methods: To test this hypothesis, we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from the UCLA Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics study including 257 adults (aged 21-50) who met diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, bipolar, or attention deficit-hyperactivity disorders or were healthy controls. We examined relations between p-factor scores and cerebellar activation across participants during three fMRI tasks of working memory (Spatial Capacity), cognitive flexibility (Task-Switching), and response inhibition (StopSignal). Specificity analyses of cerebellar activation associated with internalizing, externalizing, and thought disorder factor scores also were conducted.
Results: Robust posterior cerebellar activation was identified during all three fMRI tasks. Higher p-factor scores were associated with poorer EF performance, greater activation of cerebellar Crus I/II and lobule VIIIA/B with increasing working memory difficulty, and greater activation of lobules VI and VIIIA/B during successful inhibition (R2 range: 0.078-0.108). Associations between cerebellar activation and internalizing, externalizing, and thought disorder factor scores were largely overlapping with associations with the p-factor.
Conclusions: These novel results identify functional alterations within the posterior cerebellum during EF in individuals high in general psychopathology. Greater activation of the posterior cerebellum may be a transdiagnostic dysfunction reflecting inefficient information processing during EF present across disorder categories.
{"title":"Cerebellar Functional Alterations during Executive Functioning are Associated with General Psychopathology in a Cross-Diagnostic Sample.","authors":"Adrienne L Romer, Garrett Hosterman, Poornima Kumar, Diego A Pizzagalli","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accumulating evidence points to the cerebellum's role in executive functioning (EF) and transdiagnostic psychopathology. A general psychopathology 'p-factor,' capturing shared variation across mental disorders, has been associated with EF deficits and structural alterations within the posterior cerebellum. One hypothesis is that the cerebellum contributes to general psychopathology because of its role in executive dysfunctions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To test this hypothesis, we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from the UCLA Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics study including 257 adults (aged 21-50) who met diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, bipolar, or attention deficit-hyperactivity disorders or were healthy controls. We examined relations between p-factor scores and cerebellar activation across participants during three fMRI tasks of working memory (Spatial Capacity), cognitive flexibility (Task-Switching), and response inhibition (StopSignal). Specificity analyses of cerebellar activation associated with internalizing, externalizing, and thought disorder factor scores also were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Robust posterior cerebellar activation was identified during all three fMRI tasks. Higher p-factor scores were associated with poorer EF performance, greater activation of cerebellar Crus I/II and lobule VIIIA/B with increasing working memory difficulty, and greater activation of lobules VI and VIIIA/B during successful inhibition (R<sup>2</sup> range: 0.078-0.108). Associations between cerebellar activation and internalizing, externalizing, and thought disorder factor scores were largely overlapping with associations with the p-factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These novel results identify functional alterations within the posterior cerebellum during EF in individuals high in general psychopathology. Greater activation of the posterior cerebellum may be a transdiagnostic dysfunction reflecting inefficient information processing during EF present across disorder categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145696341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.011
Yanmiao Yang, Xiaodong Zhang, Kun Fu, Qi Liu, Xiaolei Xu, Yuanshu Chen, Xinqi Zhou, Keith M Kendrick, Dezhong Yao, Benjamin Becker, Weihua Zhao
Background: Fear processing is multifaceted, involving dissociable neural and computational pathways that vary depending on its source and context. Yet, modality-specific fear processing, such as empathic versus subjective fear, remains poorly understood. Moreover, the role of these distinctions in clarifying the high comorbidity between generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) has been understudied.
Methods: In the current study, we combined fMRI with multivariate pattern analysis to develop two neurofunctional models: one for empathic fear (FEFS, n = 81) and another for subjective fear (SSFS, n = 81) evoked by visual stimuli. After validating these models in the independent cohorts (dynamic stimuli: n = 28), we generalized them to distinguish GAD and MDD during facial emotional processing (n = 80) and pain empathy (n = 87) tasks.
Results: Our findings revealed that both models engaged distributed brain systems, including cortical regions (e.g., prefrontal, cingulate, insula and parietal cortices) and subcortical areas (e.g., thalamus and amygdala). Crucially, we identified distinct functional profiles: FEFS-predominant regions were linked to execution, whereas SSFS-predominant regions mapped onto emotion processing. Notably, compared to SSFS, FEFS consistently discriminated between GAD and MDD during both fearful expression and affective pain empathy processing.
Conclusions: These findings demonstrate modality-specific processing of subjective and empathic fear, revealing distinct empathy-related neural signatures that may serve as potential biomarkers for differentiating GAD and MDD, offering new insights into their neurobiological distinctions.
背景:恐惧处理是多方面的,涉及可分离的神经和计算途径,这些途径因其来源和环境而异。然而,模态特定的恐惧处理,如共情与主观恐惧,仍然知之甚少。此外,这些区别在阐明广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)和重度抑郁症(MDD)之间的高共病性方面的作用尚未得到充分研究。方法:在本研究中,我们将fMRI与多变量模式分析相结合,建立了视觉刺激引起的共情恐惧(FEFS, n = 81)和主观恐惧(SSFS, n = 81)两种神经功能模型。在独立队列(动态刺激:n = 28)中验证这些模型后,我们将它们推广到面部情绪处理(n = 80)和疼痛共情(n = 87)任务中区分GAD和MDD。结果:我们的研究结果表明,这两种模型都涉及分布式脑系统,包括皮质区域(如前额叶、扣带、脑岛和顶叶皮质)和皮质下区域(如丘脑和杏仁核)。至关重要的是,我们确定了不同的功能特征:fefs主导区域与执行有关,而ssfs主导区域与情绪处理有关。值得注意的是,与SSFS相比,FEFS在恐惧表达和情感性疼痛共情加工中始终区分GAD和MDD。结论:这些发现证明了主观和共情恐惧的模式特异性加工,揭示了不同的共情相关神经特征,可能作为区分广泛性焦虑症和重度抑郁症的潜在生物标志物,为研究它们的神经生物学差异提供了新的见解。
{"title":"Neural patterns for empathic versus subjective fear in classifying between generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder.","authors":"Yanmiao Yang, Xiaodong Zhang, Kun Fu, Qi Liu, Xiaolei Xu, Yuanshu Chen, Xinqi Zhou, Keith M Kendrick, Dezhong Yao, Benjamin Becker, Weihua Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fear processing is multifaceted, involving dissociable neural and computational pathways that vary depending on its source and context. Yet, modality-specific fear processing, such as empathic versus subjective fear, remains poorly understood. Moreover, the role of these distinctions in clarifying the high comorbidity between generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) has been understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the current study, we combined fMRI with multivariate pattern analysis to develop two neurofunctional models: one for empathic fear (FEFS, n = 81) and another for subjective fear (SSFS, n = 81) evoked by visual stimuli. After validating these models in the independent cohorts (dynamic stimuli: n = 28), we generalized them to distinguish GAD and MDD during facial emotional processing (n = 80) and pain empathy (n = 87) tasks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings revealed that both models engaged distributed brain systems, including cortical regions (e.g., prefrontal, cingulate, insula and parietal cortices) and subcortical areas (e.g., thalamus and amygdala). Crucially, we identified distinct functional profiles: FEFS-predominant regions were linked to execution, whereas SSFS-predominant regions mapped onto emotion processing. Notably, compared to SSFS, FEFS consistently discriminated between GAD and MDD during both fearful expression and affective pain empathy processing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate modality-specific processing of subjective and empathic fear, revealing distinct empathy-related neural signatures that may serve as potential biomarkers for differentiating GAD and MDD, offering new insights into their neurobiological distinctions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145696337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.007
Eline F Roelofs, Nynke A Groenewold, Kinga Farkas, Alyssa H Zhu, Si Gao, Tiana Borgers, Udo Dannlowski, Kira Flinkenflügel, Dominik Grotegerd, Tim Hahn, Andreas Jansen, Elisabeth J Leehr, Tilo T J Kircher, Hannah Meinert, Igor Nenadić, Frederike Stein, Benjamin Straube, Tamer Demiralp, Raşit Tükel, P Michiel Westenberg, Jochen Bauer, Anna Kraus, Alexander G G Doruyter, Christine Lochner, David Hofmann, Thomas Straube, André Zugman, Monica E Calkins, Raquel E Gur, Ruben C Gur, Bart S Larsen, Theodore D Sattertwaithe, Theresa M Slump, Roman A Vogler, Suzanne N Avery, Jennifer U Blackford, Jacqueline A Clauss, Su Lui, Sophia I Thomopoulos, Robert R J M Vermeiren, Neda Jahanshad, Peter V Kochunov, Paul M Thompson, Daniel S Pine, Dan J Stein, Nic J A van der Wee, Janna Marie Bas-Hoogendam
Background: Studies investigating social anxiety disorder (SAD) have reported inconsistent alterations in white matter (WM) microstructure. The ENIGMA-Anxiety Working Group investigated differences in microstructure of 25 WM tracts between individuals with SAD and healthy controls in a mega-analysis.
Methods: We analyzed data from 487 individuals with SAD and 1,604 healthy controls (HC) (age 8 - 65) from twelve cohorts worldwide. Analyses and quality control were performed using standardized ENIGMA diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-protocols. We primarily examined fractional anisotropy (FA) as the main parameter of WM microstructure. Linear mixed-effects analyses were conducted to compare individuals with SAD with HC in the full sample. Next, adult (age > 21) and adolescent (age ≤ 21) samples were analyzed separately. In sensitivity analyses, additional effects of sex, medication, symptom severity and comorbid psychiatric disorders were investigated.
Results: In the full sample, individuals with SAD showed lower FA in several tracts, including the corpus callosum and fornix, when compared to HC. Widespread sex-by-diagnosis interactions were observed, mostly driven by lower FA in SAD females. Adults with SAD showed lower FA in multiple tracts, while age-by-diagnosis interactions were observed in adolescents.
Conclusions: Using a mega-analytic approach, several differences in WM microstructure were found between individuals with SAD and HC, both in the full sample and in age-group specific sensitivity analyses.
{"title":"White matter microstructure alterations in social anxiety disorder - a mega-analysis across 12 cohorts in the ENIGMA-Anxiety Working Group.","authors":"Eline F Roelofs, Nynke A Groenewold, Kinga Farkas, Alyssa H Zhu, Si Gao, Tiana Borgers, Udo Dannlowski, Kira Flinkenflügel, Dominik Grotegerd, Tim Hahn, Andreas Jansen, Elisabeth J Leehr, Tilo T J Kircher, Hannah Meinert, Igor Nenadić, Frederike Stein, Benjamin Straube, Tamer Demiralp, Raşit Tükel, P Michiel Westenberg, Jochen Bauer, Anna Kraus, Alexander G G Doruyter, Christine Lochner, David Hofmann, Thomas Straube, André Zugman, Monica E Calkins, Raquel E Gur, Ruben C Gur, Bart S Larsen, Theodore D Sattertwaithe, Theresa M Slump, Roman A Vogler, Suzanne N Avery, Jennifer U Blackford, Jacqueline A Clauss, Su Lui, Sophia I Thomopoulos, Robert R J M Vermeiren, Neda Jahanshad, Peter V Kochunov, Paul M Thompson, Daniel S Pine, Dan J Stein, Nic J A van der Wee, Janna Marie Bas-Hoogendam","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies investigating social anxiety disorder (SAD) have reported inconsistent alterations in white matter (WM) microstructure. The ENIGMA-Anxiety Working Group investigated differences in microstructure of 25 WM tracts between individuals with SAD and healthy controls in a mega-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 487 individuals with SAD and 1,604 healthy controls (HC) (age 8 - 65) from twelve cohorts worldwide. Analyses and quality control were performed using standardized ENIGMA diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-protocols. We primarily examined fractional anisotropy (FA) as the main parameter of WM microstructure. Linear mixed-effects analyses were conducted to compare individuals with SAD with HC in the full sample. Next, adult (age > 21) and adolescent (age ≤ 21) samples were analyzed separately. In sensitivity analyses, additional effects of sex, medication, symptom severity and comorbid psychiatric disorders were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the full sample, individuals with SAD showed lower FA in several tracts, including the corpus callosum and fornix, when compared to HC. Widespread sex-by-diagnosis interactions were observed, mostly driven by lower FA in SAD females. Adults with SAD showed lower FA in multiple tracts, while age-by-diagnosis interactions were observed in adolescents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a mega-analytic approach, several differences in WM microstructure were found between individuals with SAD and HC, both in the full sample and in age-group specific sensitivity analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145673141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-29DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.008
Jesca E De Jager, Monique van der Weijden-Germann, Edwin van Dellen, Erik F J de Vries, Iris E C Sommer, Jasper O Nuninga
Background: The structure and tissue composition of the cortex may be sensitive to loss of synapses. However, the relation between measurements of synaptic density, cortical thickness and microstructure remains unknown. These measures are reduced in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and to a lesser degree in unaffected relatives. Here, we investigated if synaptic density and cortical (micro)structure are related in healthy subjects, and if these associations are altered in patients with SSD and unaffected siblings.
Methods: Brain uptake of the tracer [11C]UCB-J, measured in-vivo with positron emission tomography (PET) was used as a proxy measure for synaptic density. Healthy subjects (n=25), patients with SSD (n=24) and unaffected siblings (n=25) underwent [11C]UCB-J PET, T1-weighted MRI and diffusion weighted imaging scans.
Results: We found a positive relation between [11C]UCB-J BPND and cortical thickness (β=0.61, p=.02) and showed a similar (yet non-significant) positive relation in unaffected siblings (β=0.41, p=.09). This relation was not present in patients with SSD (β=0.03, p=.90). Additionally, [11C]UCB-J BPND had a negative relation with mean diffusivity (MD) in controls (β=-0.54, p=.01) and unaffected siblings (β=-0.47, p=.01). In patients with SSD, again, this relation was disrupted (β=0.07, p=.78).
Conclusion: We found a robust association between synaptic density and cortical (micro)structure in healthy individuals. The lost relation in patients suggest that SSD-related synapse loss is not proportional to the number and organization of grey matter constituents. Despite the shared genetic risk, unaffected siblings preserve this relation, suggesting absence of a second hit inducing excessive synaptic pruning.
{"title":"Relationship between synaptic density and cortical (micro)structure in healthy subjects, patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and unaffected siblings: a multimodal [<sup>11</sup>C]UCB-J PET and MRI study.","authors":"Jesca E De Jager, Monique van der Weijden-Germann, Edwin van Dellen, Erik F J de Vries, Iris E C Sommer, Jasper O Nuninga","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The structure and tissue composition of the cortex may be sensitive to loss of synapses. However, the relation between measurements of synaptic density, cortical thickness and microstructure remains unknown. These measures are reduced in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and to a lesser degree in unaffected relatives. Here, we investigated if synaptic density and cortical (micro)structure are related in healthy subjects, and if these associations are altered in patients with SSD and unaffected siblings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Brain uptake of the tracer [<sup>11</sup>C]UCB-J, measured in-vivo with positron emission tomography (PET) was used as a proxy measure for synaptic density. Healthy subjects (n=25), patients with SSD (n=24) and unaffected siblings (n=25) underwent [<sup>11</sup>C]UCB-J PET, T1-weighted MRI and diffusion weighted imaging scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a positive relation between [<sup>11</sup>C]UCB-J BP<sub>ND</sub> and cortical thickness (β=0.61, p=.02) and showed a similar (yet non-significant) positive relation in unaffected siblings (β=0.41, p=.09). This relation was not present in patients with SSD (β=0.03, p=.90). Additionally, [<sup>11</sup>C]UCB-J BP<sub>ND</sub> had a negative relation with mean diffusivity (MD) in controls (β=-0.54, p=.01) and unaffected siblings (β=-0.47, p=.01). In patients with SSD, again, this relation was disrupted (β=0.07, p=.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a robust association between synaptic density and cortical (micro)structure in healthy individuals. The lost relation in patients suggest that SSD-related synapse loss is not proportional to the number and organization of grey matter constituents. Despite the shared genetic risk, unaffected siblings preserve this relation, suggesting absence of a second hit inducing excessive synaptic pruning.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-24DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.005
Yizhou Lyu, Anna Corriveau, Hanna Molla, Harriet de Wit, Monica D Rosenberg
Background: Between-subjects studies suggest that psychostimulants can shift whole-brain functional connectivity toward patterns linked to heightened sustained attention. In this study, we examined how a single dose of methamphetamine (MA, 20 mg) changes sustained attention and associated network-level functional organization in healthy adults.
Methods: We conducted a within-subject study in which 76 healthy participants completed two fMRI scanning sessions after taking MA or placebo. We tested whether MA selectively affects behavioral and fMRI connectivity signatures of sustained attention and arousal.
Results: Under MA, participants showed improved sustained attention task performance as well as functional connectivity signatures of higher sustained attention and arousal. These network changes emerged consistently across resting-state and task-based fMRI, indicating that MA influences attention- and arousal-related networks regardless of cognitive context. Furthermore, a support vector classifier distinguished functional connectivity patterns observed during the MA and placebo conditions, identifying connections overlapping with networks related to arousal.
Conclusions: Together, these findings align with prior work on other psychostimulants like methylphenidate, showing that MA modulates sustained attention and related large-scale brain networks. By revealing how MA modulates attention-relevant brain connectivity patterns, our results highlight the utility of psychostimulants as causal tools for probing the robustness, generalizability, and interpretability of brain-based biomarkers of behavior.
{"title":"Methamphetamine modulates functional connectivity signatures of sustained attention and arousal.","authors":"Yizhou Lyu, Anna Corriveau, Hanna Molla, Harriet de Wit, Monica D Rosenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between-subjects studies suggest that psychostimulants can shift whole-brain functional connectivity toward patterns linked to heightened sustained attention. In this study, we examined how a single dose of methamphetamine (MA, 20 mg) changes sustained attention and associated network-level functional organization in healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a within-subject study in which 76 healthy participants completed two fMRI scanning sessions after taking MA or placebo. We tested whether MA selectively affects behavioral and fMRI connectivity signatures of sustained attention and arousal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under MA, participants showed improved sustained attention task performance as well as functional connectivity signatures of higher sustained attention and arousal. These network changes emerged consistently across resting-state and task-based fMRI, indicating that MA influences attention- and arousal-related networks regardless of cognitive context. Furthermore, a support vector classifier distinguished functional connectivity patterns observed during the MA and placebo conditions, identifying connections overlapping with networks related to arousal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Together, these findings align with prior work on other psychostimulants like methylphenidate, showing that MA modulates sustained attention and related large-scale brain networks. By revealing how MA modulates attention-relevant brain connectivity patterns, our results highlight the utility of psychostimulants as causal tools for probing the robustness, generalizability, and interpretability of brain-based biomarkers of behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12674003/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145643929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-21DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.003
Lea Teutenberg, Nooshin Javaheripour, Sarah Alizadeh, Bita Shariatpanahi, Elina Stocker, Frederike Stein, Florian Thomas-Odenthal, Paula Usemann, Susanne Meinert, Elisabeth Leehr, Kira Flinkenflügel, Tiana Borgers, Linda Bonnekoh, Nils R Winter, Felix Bernhard, Martin Walter, Igor Nenadić, Nina Alexander, Benjamin Straube, Andreas Jansen, Tim Hahn, Udo Dannlowski, Tilo Kircher, Hamidreza Jamalabadi
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) involves subtle, distributed alterations across multiple large-scale resting-state brain networks (RSNs), highlighting the need for integrative approaches to uncover synergistic network patterns driving clinical symptoms.
Methods: In this study, we employed a dynamical systems approach to investigate patterns of simultaneous RSN activation - i.e. co-activation - in 867 participants, including 487 healthy controls (HC), 175 patients with current MDD (cMDD), and 205 with remitted MDD (rMDD) from the Marburg-Münster Affective Disorders Cohort Study. Using a pairwise Maximum Entropy Model, we estimated RSN co-activation probabilities based on resting state fMRI data of seven RSNs-default mode network (DMN), frontoparietal network (FPN), sensorimotor network (SMN), visual network (VIS), salience network, dorsal attention network (DAN), and language network (LAN)-capturing 128 possible states of co-activation.
Results: General linear models revealed elevated co-activation probabilities in cMDD, particularly for states involving DMN, FPN, and VIS, with the co-activation state involving DMN, VIS, DAN, FPN, and LAN showing the strongest association with MDD diagnosis, clinical status, and symptom severity. Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) on the full sample further identified two distinct network-symptom profiles: Canonical variate (CV) 1 linked high DMN and DAN co-activation probabilities to cognitive, insomnia, and mood/anhedonia symptoms, while CV2 tied SMN and VIS to cognitive and somatic symptom domains.
Conclusions: These results demonstrate that MDD, especially during acute episodes, is marked by a dominance of DMN, FPN, and VIS co-activation, pointing to altered dynamic network organization. They highlight how changes in brain state dynamics are linked to MDD symptoms.
背景:重度抑郁症(MDD)涉及多个大尺度静息状态脑网络(rsn)的微妙、分布式改变,强调需要综合方法来揭示驱动临床症状的协同网络模式。方法:在本研究中,我们采用动态系统方法研究了867名参与者的RSN同时激活模式(即共激活),其中包括487名健康对照(HC), 175名当前MDD (cMDD)患者,以及来自marburg - m nster情感障碍队列研究的205名缓解型MDD (rMDD)患者。利用两两最大熵模型(pairwise Maximum Entropy Model),基于7个RSN的静息状态fMRI数据(默认模式网络(DMN)、额顶叶网络(FPN)、感觉运动网络(SMN)、视觉网络(VIS)、显著性网络、背侧注意网络(DAN)和语言网络(LAN))估计了RSN共激活概率,并捕获了128种可能的共激活状态。结果:一般线性模型显示cMDD的共激活概率升高,特别是涉及DMN、FPN和VIS的共激活状态,涉及DMN、VIS、DAN、FPN和LAN的共激活状态与MDD诊断、临床状态和症状严重程度的相关性最强。全样本的典型相关分析(CCA)进一步确定了两种不同的网络症状概况:典型变量(CV) 1将DMN和DAN的高共激活概率与认知、失眠和情绪/快感缺乏症状联系起来,而CV2将SMN和VIS与认知和躯体症状联系起来。结论:这些结果表明,重度抑郁症,特别是在急性发作期间,以DMN、FPN和VIS共激活为主为特征,表明动态网络组织发生了变化。他们强调了大脑状态动态变化与重度抑郁症症状的关系。
{"title":"Synergistic Co-Activation Probabilities of Large-Scale Resting State Networks in Major Depressive Disorder.","authors":"Lea Teutenberg, Nooshin Javaheripour, Sarah Alizadeh, Bita Shariatpanahi, Elina Stocker, Frederike Stein, Florian Thomas-Odenthal, Paula Usemann, Susanne Meinert, Elisabeth Leehr, Kira Flinkenflügel, Tiana Borgers, Linda Bonnekoh, Nils R Winter, Felix Bernhard, Martin Walter, Igor Nenadić, Nina Alexander, Benjamin Straube, Andreas Jansen, Tim Hahn, Udo Dannlowski, Tilo Kircher, Hamidreza Jamalabadi","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) involves subtle, distributed alterations across multiple large-scale resting-state brain networks (RSNs), highlighting the need for integrative approaches to uncover synergistic network patterns driving clinical symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we employed a dynamical systems approach to investigate patterns of simultaneous RSN activation - i.e. co-activation - in 867 participants, including 487 healthy controls (HC), 175 patients with current MDD (cMDD), and 205 with remitted MDD (rMDD) from the Marburg-Münster Affective Disorders Cohort Study. Using a pairwise Maximum Entropy Model, we estimated RSN co-activation probabilities based on resting state fMRI data of seven RSNs-default mode network (DMN), frontoparietal network (FPN), sensorimotor network (SMN), visual network (VIS), salience network, dorsal attention network (DAN), and language network (LAN)-capturing 128 possible states of co-activation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>General linear models revealed elevated co-activation probabilities in cMDD, particularly for states involving DMN, FPN, and VIS, with the co-activation state involving DMN, VIS, DAN, FPN, and LAN showing the strongest association with MDD diagnosis, clinical status, and symptom severity. Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) on the full sample further identified two distinct network-symptom profiles: Canonical variate (CV) 1 linked high DMN and DAN co-activation probabilities to cognitive, insomnia, and mood/anhedonia symptoms, while CV2 tied SMN and VIS to cognitive and somatic symptom domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrate that MDD, especially during acute episodes, is marked by a dominance of DMN, FPN, and VIS co-activation, pointing to altered dynamic network organization. They highlight how changes in brain state dynamics are linked to MDD symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145590316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-21DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.004
Xiaoyu Dong, Jessica A Cooper, Erin K Moran, Deanna M Barch
Background: Effort-cost decision-making (ECDM) is a core component of motivational deficits across diagnostic boundaries, yet mechanisms underlying ECDM deficits are not yet fully understood. Importantly, similar behavioral phenotypes during ECDM paradigms may be associated with distinct underlying cognitive and affective processes across individuals.
Methods: We used a person-centered modeling approach to examine individual decision-making phenotypes (systematic or non-systematic decision-making) during both physical and cognitive ECDM in 5 diagnostic groups: healthy control (N=90), schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (N=67), current major depression (N=70), remitted major depression (N=52), and bipolar I disorder (N=64). We examined the association between ECDM phenotype, cognitive functioning, motivation, and diagnostic group.
Results: We found significant diagnostic group differences in ECDM phenotype, such that individuals with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, but not current or remitted major depression or bipolar disorder, were less likely to incorporate changing trial-wise reward value information in cognitive effort exertion, with the same trend for physical. Across all diagnostic groups, non-systematic decision-making was associated with lower cognitive functioning, but not lower motivation. In addition, individuals with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder showed steeper effort discounting during both physical and cognitive ECDM paradigms.
Conclusions: These findings point toward substantial individual differences in ECDM phenotypes both within and across diagnostic boundaries, suggesting that deficits in subjective value representation may be more prevalent in psychosis, compared to in mood disorders.
{"title":"Understanding Effort-Cost Decision-Making Mechanisms in Mood and Psychotic Disorders: A Computational Modeling Approach Across Physical and Cognitive Effort Paradigms.","authors":"Xiaoyu Dong, Jessica A Cooper, Erin K Moran, Deanna M Barch","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.11.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effort-cost decision-making (ECDM) is a core component of motivational deficits across diagnostic boundaries, yet mechanisms underlying ECDM deficits are not yet fully understood. Importantly, similar behavioral phenotypes during ECDM paradigms may be associated with distinct underlying cognitive and affective processes across individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a person-centered modeling approach to examine individual decision-making phenotypes (systematic or non-systematic decision-making) during both physical and cognitive ECDM in 5 diagnostic groups: healthy control (N=90), schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (N=67), current major depression (N=70), remitted major depression (N=52), and bipolar I disorder (N=64). We examined the association between ECDM phenotype, cognitive functioning, motivation, and diagnostic group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found significant diagnostic group differences in ECDM phenotype, such that individuals with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, but not current or remitted major depression or bipolar disorder, were less likely to incorporate changing trial-wise reward value information in cognitive effort exertion, with the same trend for physical. Across all diagnostic groups, non-systematic decision-making was associated with lower cognitive functioning, but not lower motivation. In addition, individuals with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder showed steeper effort discounting during both physical and cognitive ECDM paradigms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings point toward substantial individual differences in ECDM phenotypes both within and across diagnostic boundaries, suggesting that deficits in subjective value representation may be more prevalent in psychosis, compared to in mood disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145590336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}