A card-based design tool for supporting design thinking in elementary students

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Technology and Design Education Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1007/s10798-024-09916-3
Ioannis Arvanitakis, George Palaigeorgiou, Tharrenos Bratitsis
{"title":"A card-based design tool for supporting design thinking in elementary students","authors":"Ioannis Arvanitakis, George Palaigeorgiou, Tharrenos Bratitsis","doi":"10.1007/s10798-024-09916-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although educational robotics competitions have become a popular research field in STEAM education, there is a lack of studies concerning the design process that student teams follow to build their solutions. This study aims to propose and evaluate We!Design!ForSTEAM, an approach for supporting design thinking in the context of STEAM and robotics competitions for elementary school students based on a card-based design game. The proposed methodology is derived from participatory design approaches. It is based on 40 design cards, which aim to empower elementary students to empathize with the problem and ideate creatively and efficiently for identifying solutions. It was applied in 6 sessions with the participation of 31 elementary students preparing for an open educational robotics competition. Questionnaires and focus groups were used to gather data from the students who argued that the proposed approach allowed them to explore the problem in an unexpected, creative, and productive way. They managed to identify complex problems and produce innovative solutions utilizing a structured design process with ideation probes. Weaknesses of the framework, primarily focused on time management, were also identified and reported. We suggest that the proposed approach is a first step to creating design thinking methodologies for elementary students in educational robotics and STEAM.</p>","PeriodicalId":50286,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology and Design Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology and Design Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09916-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although educational robotics competitions have become a popular research field in STEAM education, there is a lack of studies concerning the design process that student teams follow to build their solutions. This study aims to propose and evaluate We!Design!ForSTEAM, an approach for supporting design thinking in the context of STEAM and robotics competitions for elementary school students based on a card-based design game. The proposed methodology is derived from participatory design approaches. It is based on 40 design cards, which aim to empower elementary students to empathize with the problem and ideate creatively and efficiently for identifying solutions. It was applied in 6 sessions with the participation of 31 elementary students preparing for an open educational robotics competition. Questionnaires and focus groups were used to gather data from the students who argued that the proposed approach allowed them to explore the problem in an unexpected, creative, and productive way. They managed to identify complex problems and produce innovative solutions utilizing a structured design process with ideation probes. Weaknesses of the framework, primarily focused on time management, were also identified and reported. We suggest that the proposed approach is a first step to creating design thinking methodologies for elementary students in educational robotics and STEAM.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持小学生设计思维的卡片式设计工具
尽管教育机器人竞赛已成为 STEAM 教育的热门研究领域,但有关学生团队在构建解决方案时所遵循的设计流程的研究却十分缺乏。本研究旨在提出并评估 "我们!设计!"(We!Design!ForSTEAM)这一方法,该方法以基于卡片的设计游戏为基础,支持小学生在 STEAM 和机器人竞赛中的设计思维。建议的方法源自参与式设计方法。它以 40 张设计卡为基础,旨在增强小学生对问题的共鸣,并创造性地、高效地构思出解决方案。31 名小学生参与了 6 节课,准备参加开放式教育机器人竞赛。问卷调查和焦点小组被用来收集学生们的数据,他们认为所提出的方法让他们能够以一种意想不到、富有创造性和富有成效的方式来探索问题。他们成功地发现了复杂的问题,并利用结构化的设计流程和构思探针提出了创新的解决方案。他们还指出并报告了该框架的不足之处,主要集中在时间管理方面。我们建议,所提出的方法是在教育机器人和 STEAM 领域为小学生创建设计思维方法的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Technology and Design Education seeks to encourage research and scholarly writing about any aspect of technology and design education. Critical, review, and comparative studies are particularly prominent, as are contributions which draw upon other literatures, such as those derived from historical, philosophical, sociological or psychological studies of technology or design, in order to address issues of concern to technology and design education. One of the most significant developments of recent years has been the emergence of technology and design education as an integral part of general education in many parts of the world. Its distinctive curriculum features are technological literacy and capability and it highlights the importance of `knowledge in action'', of `doing'' as well as `understanding''.
期刊最新文献
Adapting engineering design thinking for sustainability The mediating role of creative problem solving between design thinking and self-efficacy in STEM teaching for STEM teacher candidates Technology-enhanced learning practices in studio pedagogy: A scoping review Cultivating ethics sensitivity in design: Impact of integrating ethics within K-12 digital design education Research on K-12 maker education in the early 2020s – a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1