“Virtual bonds and actual transactions”: investigating the impact of virtual influencers' credibility on buying behavior through virtual engagement

IF 3.1 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Communication Management Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1108/jcom-02-2024-0035
Durgesh Agnihotri, Pallavi Chaturvedi, Vikas Tripathi
{"title":"“Virtual bonds and actual transactions”: investigating the impact of virtual influencers' credibility on buying behavior through virtual engagement","authors":"Durgesh Agnihotri, Pallavi Chaturvedi, Vikas Tripathi","doi":"10.1108/jcom-02-2024-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This research makes an effort to empirically investigate the role of source credibility theory (SCT) in the prevailing modern influencer marketing context by establishing an association between virtual influencers ((VIs) non-human) and the buying behavior of their followers. It further provides insights into the mediating role of virtual engagement on the affiliation between VIs’ credibility and the buying behavior of followers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study used structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) to assess data from a survey conducted online of 538 participants (Instagram followers of virtual influencers).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results reveal that source credibility dimensions significantly affect followers’ buying behavior in the context of VIs except the trustworthiness dimension. However, mediation analysis has shown that virtual engagement substantially mediates between source credibility dimensions including trustworthiness.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The study highlights the value of the credibility of VI and its alignment with the followers’ buying behavior. The study provides valuable inputs for the brand managers as the credibility of the VI can be effectively leveraged in implementing strategies to encourage their followers/consumers on social media platforms to purchase the goods/services they endorse.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The study overcomes the shortcomings of recent studies by empirically investigating the affiliation between VIs’ credibility and followers’ buying behavior through Instagram. The study uniquely extends the potential of SCT in the context of non-human VIs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-02-2024-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This research makes an effort to empirically investigate the role of source credibility theory (SCT) in the prevailing modern influencer marketing context by establishing an association between virtual influencers ((VIs) non-human) and the buying behavior of their followers. It further provides insights into the mediating role of virtual engagement on the affiliation between VIs’ credibility and the buying behavior of followers.

Design/methodology/approach

The study used structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) to assess data from a survey conducted online of 538 participants (Instagram followers of virtual influencers).

Findings

The results reveal that source credibility dimensions significantly affect followers’ buying behavior in the context of VIs except the trustworthiness dimension. However, mediation analysis has shown that virtual engagement substantially mediates between source credibility dimensions including trustworthiness.

Practical implications

The study highlights the value of the credibility of VI and its alignment with the followers’ buying behavior. The study provides valuable inputs for the brand managers as the credibility of the VI can be effectively leveraged in implementing strategies to encourage their followers/consumers on social media platforms to purchase the goods/services they endorse.

Originality/value

The study overcomes the shortcomings of recent studies by empirically investigating the affiliation between VIs’ credibility and followers’ buying behavior through Instagram. The study uniquely extends the potential of SCT in the context of non-human VIs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"虚拟纽带与实际交易":研究虚拟影响者的可信度通过虚拟参与对购买行为的影响
目的本研究通过建立虚拟影响者((VIs)非人类)与其追随者的购买行为之间的关联,对来源可信度理论(SCT)在现代影响者营销背景下的作用进行实证研究。研究采用结构方程模型(CB-SEM)评估了对 538 名参与者(虚拟影响者的 Instagram 追随者)进行的在线调查数据。研究结果表明,在虚拟影响者的背景下,除了可信度维度外,来源可信度维度显著影响追随者的购买行为。然而,中介分析表明,虚拟参与在包括可信度在内的来源可信度维度之间起到了实质性的中介作用。该研究为品牌管理者提供了宝贵的意见,因为可以有效地利用VI的可信度来实施战略,鼓励社交媒体平台上的粉丝/消费者购买他们所认可的商品/服务。原创性/价值该研究克服了近期研究的不足,通过Instagram对VI的可信度与粉丝购买行为之间的关联进行了实证调查。该研究独特地将 SCT 的潜力扩展到了非人类虚拟形象中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Subjective well-being perceptions of Portuguese Public Relations practitioners: a gender and stages of life analysis Loneliness, office space arrangement and mental well-being of Gen Z PR professionals. Falling into the trap of an agile office? The influence of leaders’ motivational language on employee well-being through relatedness in remote work environments Subjective well-being of public relations and communication professionals in the context of perceived organisational support Understanding subjective well-being across a multi-generational workforce in public relations: a qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1