Mindfulness for Reducing Everyday Suicidal Thoughts (Mind-REST): A Daily Mindfulness Intervention for Adults with Suicidal Ideation

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1007/s10608-024-10516-7
Ana Rabasco, Gemma T. Wallace, Margaret Andover
{"title":"Mindfulness for Reducing Everyday Suicidal Thoughts (Mind-REST): A Daily Mindfulness Intervention for Adults with Suicidal Ideation","authors":"Ana Rabasco, Gemma T. Wallace, Margaret Andover","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10516-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Suicide is a significant public health concern; therefore, it is essential to develop interventions that effectively target suicidality and can be easily implemented with high-risk populations. This pilot randomized controlled trial investigated the feasibility and acceptability of a brief, daily, text-based mindfulness intervention (Mind-REST) targeting suicidality, as compared with a sham mindfulness control condition. A secondary aim was to examine potential differences in suicidal ideation within and between groups over the course of the study.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Participants included 82 adults with recent suicidal ideation or behaviors who completed 14 days of mindfulness or sham-mindfulness exercises, along with a daily diary survey each evening. Participants also completed a post-intervention survey and a one-month follow-up survey.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Mind-REST was shown to be feasible and acceptable, as evidenced by high study completion and intervention compliance rates (88% and 89%, respectively) and positive participant feedback. There were greater reductions in suicidal ideation severity for participants in the Mind-REST condition compared with the control condition across post-intervention and follow-up, but not on a daily level.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Mind-REST demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy in reducing suicidal ideation; however, a larger trial is needed to fully examine the efficacy of the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10516-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Suicide is a significant public health concern; therefore, it is essential to develop interventions that effectively target suicidality and can be easily implemented with high-risk populations. This pilot randomized controlled trial investigated the feasibility and acceptability of a brief, daily, text-based mindfulness intervention (Mind-REST) targeting suicidality, as compared with a sham mindfulness control condition. A secondary aim was to examine potential differences in suicidal ideation within and between groups over the course of the study.

Methods

Participants included 82 adults with recent suicidal ideation or behaviors who completed 14 days of mindfulness or sham-mindfulness exercises, along with a daily diary survey each evening. Participants also completed a post-intervention survey and a one-month follow-up survey.

Results

Mind-REST was shown to be feasible and acceptable, as evidenced by high study completion and intervention compliance rates (88% and 89%, respectively) and positive participant feedback. There were greater reductions in suicidal ideation severity for participants in the Mind-REST condition compared with the control condition across post-intervention and follow-up, but not on a daily level.

Conclusions

Mind-REST demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy in reducing suicidal ideation; however, a larger trial is needed to fully examine the efficacy of the intervention.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少日常自杀想法的正念(Mind-REST):针对有自杀倾向成年人的日常正念干预措施
背景自杀是一个重大的公共卫生问题;因此,必须开发出有效针对自杀倾向的干预措施,并能在高危人群中轻松实施。本随机对照试验调查了针对自杀倾向的简短、日常、基于文本的正念干预(Mind-REST)与假正念对照的可行性和可接受性。方法参与者包括82名近期有自杀意念或行为的成年人,他们完成了为期14天的正念或假正念练习,每天晚上还进行了日记调查。研究结果表明,Mind-REST 具有可行性和可接受性,这体现在较高的研究完成率和干预依从率(分别为 88% 和 89%)以及参与者的积极反馈上。与对照组相比,在干预后和随访期间,Mind-REST 条件下的参与者自杀意念严重程度有更大的降低,但不是每天都有降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Cognitive Therapy and Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Cognitive Therapy and Research (COTR) focuses on the investigation of cognitive processes in human adaptation and adjustment and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). It is an interdisciplinary journal welcoming submissions from diverse areas of psychology, including cognitive, clinical, developmental, experimental, personality, social, learning, affective neuroscience, emotion research, therapy mechanism, and pharmacotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Examining Relationships between Psychological Flexibility and Comorbidity of Depression and Anxiety: A Network Analysis in a Non-Clinical Community Sample Lay Theories for Social Anxiety: Examining the Impact of Viewing Social Anxiety as Malleable Due to Personal Effort versus Fixed in Nature in a Non-clinical Sample Training to Increase Processing of Positive Content Paradoxically Decreases Positive Memory Bias in High Levels of Depression Associations Between Self-Criticism, Basic Psychological Needs Frustration, and Self-Damaging Behaviors: An Application of Self-Determination Theory Relapse prevention following guided self-help for common health problems: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1