Are top Business Schools in India assessing contemporary managerial competencies required by industry during MBA selection process?

IF 5.3 2区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACS Applied Nano Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101032
Amit Agnihotri, Rajnish Kumar Misra
{"title":"Are top Business Schools in India assessing contemporary managerial competencies required by industry during MBA selection process?","authors":"Amit Agnihotri,&nbsp;Rajnish Kumar Misra","doi":"10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To understand the reasons for the often-reported competency gaps in MBA graduates, studies have probed the alignment of curriculum and learning goals with the competency required by industry but reached different conclusions. Studies have also reported that interpersonal and entrepreneurial competencies are not assessed effectively during MBA admissions. Even though prior studies have recommended a comprehensive evaluation of the MBA admission process to reduce competency gaps, to our knowledge, no study has probed if the MBA selection process effectively assesses each of the required contemporary managerial competencies. Based on a primary survey of Indian MBA admission decision-makers, this study identifies nine key competencies, and their relative importance, that the MBA admission process in India assesses. A key finding of this study is that industry experts and academics disagree on the importance of six of these nine competencies, thus confirming a lack of alignment. MBA admission decision-makers also do not use specific and quantitative criteria while assessing most of these key competencies. For instance, 90% of respondents said they did not use specific and quantitative criteria for evaluating execution &amp; digital competencies. Business schools should align admissions to assess required contemporary competencies effectively. Faculty may offer pedagogical intervention to boost competencies not assessed effectively during admissions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Nano Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Nano Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811724001034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To understand the reasons for the often-reported competency gaps in MBA graduates, studies have probed the alignment of curriculum and learning goals with the competency required by industry but reached different conclusions. Studies have also reported that interpersonal and entrepreneurial competencies are not assessed effectively during MBA admissions. Even though prior studies have recommended a comprehensive evaluation of the MBA admission process to reduce competency gaps, to our knowledge, no study has probed if the MBA selection process effectively assesses each of the required contemporary managerial competencies. Based on a primary survey of Indian MBA admission decision-makers, this study identifies nine key competencies, and their relative importance, that the MBA admission process in India assesses. A key finding of this study is that industry experts and academics disagree on the importance of six of these nine competencies, thus confirming a lack of alignment. MBA admission decision-makers also do not use specific and quantitative criteria while assessing most of these key competencies. For instance, 90% of respondents said they did not use specific and quantitative criteria for evaluating execution & digital competencies. Business schools should align admissions to assess required contemporary competencies effectively. Faculty may offer pedagogical intervention to boost competencies not assessed effectively during admissions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度的顶级商学院是否在 MBA 遴选过程中评估行业所需的当代管理能力?
为了了解经常报道的 MBA 毕业生能力差距的原因,有研究探讨了课程和学习目标与行业能力要求的一致性,但得出的结论各不相同。还有研究报告称,在 MBA 招生过程中,人际交往和创业能力没有得到有效评估。尽管之前的研究建议对 MBA 招生过程进行全面评估,以减少能力差距,但据我们所知,还没有研究探究 MBA 遴选过程是否有效评估了当代所需的各项管理能力。根据对印度 MBA 招生决策者的初步调查,本研究确定了印度 MBA 招生程序所评估的九种关键能力及其相对重要性。本研究的一个重要发现是,行业专家和学者对这九项能力中的六项能力的重要性意见不一,从而证实了缺乏一致性。MBA 招生决策者在评估大多数关键能力时,也没有使用具体的量化标准。例如,90% 的受访者表示,他们在评估执行力和数字化能力时没有使用具体的量化标准。商学院应调整招生工作,以有效评估所需的当代能力。教师可提供教学干预,以提高招生过程中未有效评估的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
1601
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Nano Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to applications of nanomaterials. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important applications of nanomaterials.
期刊最新文献
FGL2172-220 peptides improve the antitumor effect of HCMV-IE1mut vaccine against glioblastoma by modulating immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment. HLA class II neoantigen presentation for CD4+ T cell surveillance in HLA class II-negative colorectal cancer. Pretreatment With Unfractionated Heparin in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction—a Propensity Score Matching Analysis. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Clinical Practice Guideline: Condylar Hyperplasia of the Mandible—Diagnosis and Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1