Unpacking Social Determinants of Cancer Disparities: A Systematic Review and Strategic Framework for Equitable Prevention and Control

Jackline Jushua, Muhammad R. Hussein, Sonia Utterman, Mony Thomas
{"title":"Unpacking Social Determinants of Cancer Disparities: A Systematic Review and Strategic Framework for Equitable Prevention and Control","authors":"Jackline Jushua, Muhammad R. Hussein, Sonia Utterman, Mony Thomas","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.27.24311004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:\nBackground: Cancer disparities persist in the United States, with significant variations in incidence, mortality, and survival rates across different population groups. This systematic review aims to synthesize current evidence on the relationship between social determinants of health and cancer disparities, and to identify effective interventions for promoting equitable cancer prevention and control.\nMethods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2024. Studies were included if they examined the association between social determinants (e.g., socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, education, healthcare access) and cancer outcomes, or evaluated interventions addressing these factors. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed study quality using standardized tools.\nResults: Of 3,247 initially identified studies, 142 met inclusion criteria. The review found strong evidence linking various social determinants to cancer disparities, particularly in screening rates, stage at diagnosis, and survival outcomes. Socioeconomic status and healthcare access were the most frequently studied determinants. Effective interventions identified included patient navigation programs, community-based education initiatives, and policy changes to expand insurance coverage. However, the quality and long-term impact of many interventions were limited by short follow-up periods and small sample sizes.\nConclusion: This systematic review confirms the significant role of social determinants in perpetuating cancer disparities and highlights promising strategies for addressing these inequities. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating multilevel interventions that target both individual and structural determinants. Policy makers and healthcare providers should prioritize evidence-based approaches to reduce social barriers and promote equitable cancer prevention and control.","PeriodicalId":501556,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.27.24311004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Cancer disparities persist in the United States, with significant variations in incidence, mortality, and survival rates across different population groups. This systematic review aims to synthesize current evidence on the relationship between social determinants of health and cancer disparities, and to identify effective interventions for promoting equitable cancer prevention and control. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2024. Studies were included if they examined the association between social determinants (e.g., socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, education, healthcare access) and cancer outcomes, or evaluated interventions addressing these factors. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed study quality using standardized tools. Results: Of 3,247 initially identified studies, 142 met inclusion criteria. The review found strong evidence linking various social determinants to cancer disparities, particularly in screening rates, stage at diagnosis, and survival outcomes. Socioeconomic status and healthcare access were the most frequently studied determinants. Effective interventions identified included patient navigation programs, community-based education initiatives, and policy changes to expand insurance coverage. However, the quality and long-term impact of many interventions were limited by short follow-up periods and small sample sizes. Conclusion: This systematic review confirms the significant role of social determinants in perpetuating cancer disparities and highlights promising strategies for addressing these inequities. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating multilevel interventions that target both individual and structural determinants. Policy makers and healthcare providers should prioritize evidence-based approaches to reduce social barriers and promote equitable cancer prevention and control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读癌症差异的社会决定因素:公平预防和控制的系统回顾和战略框架
摘要:背景:在美国,癌症差异持续存在,不同人群的发病率、死亡率和存活率差异显著。本系统性综述旨在综合当前有关健康的社会决定因素与癌症差异之间关系的证据,并确定有效的干预措施,以促进公平的癌症预防和控制:我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中对 2010 年至 2024 年间发表的同行评审文章进行了系统检索。如果研究探讨了社会决定因素(如社会经济地位、种族/民族、教育、医疗保健途径)与癌症结果之间的关联,或评估了针对这些因素的干预措施,则纳入研究。两位独立审稿人筛选文章、提取数据,并使用标准化工具评估研究质量:在初步确定的 3,247 项研究中,142 项符合纳入标准。综述发现,有确凿证据表明各种社会决定因素与癌症差异有关,尤其是在筛查率、诊断分期和生存结果方面。社会经济地位和医疗服务是最常被研究的决定因素。已确定的有效干预措施包括患者指导计划、社区教育倡议以及扩大保险覆盖面的政策变化。然而,由于随访时间短、样本量小,许多干预措施的质量和长期影响受到了限制:本系统综述证实了社会决定因素在造成癌症差异方面的重要作用,并强调了解决这些不平等问题的可行策略。未来的研究应侧重于开发和评估针对个人和结构性决定因素的多层次干预措施。政策制定者和医疗服务提供者应优先考虑循证方法,以减少社会障碍,促进公平的癌症预防和控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems on the Performance of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Yumbe Regional referral hospital; A Pre-post quasi-experimental study design Plaintiff experiences of the medico-legal environment in Ireland “We’re here to help them if they want to come”: A qualitative exploration of hospital staff perceptions and experiences with outpatient non-attendance Improving Access and Efficiency of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Across Four Canadian Provinces: A Stepped-Wedge Trial I am a quarterback: A mixed methods study of death investigators' communication with family members of young sudden cardiac death victims from suspected heritable causes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1