Improving Access and Efficiency of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Across Four Canadian Provinces: A Stepped-Wedge Trial

Noreen Kamal, ACTEAST Collaborators, Elena A Cora, Simone Alim, Judah Goldstein, David Volders, Shadi Aljendi, Heather Williams, Patrick Fok, Etienne Van Der Linde, Trish Helm-Neima, Tania Chandler, Alix Carter, Renee Cashin, Brian Metcalfe, Julie Savoie, Wendy Simpkin, Fraser Clift, Cassie Chisholm, Michael D. Hill, Bijoy K Menon, Stephen J. Phillips
{"title":"Improving Access and Efficiency of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Across Four Canadian Provinces: A Stepped-Wedge Trial","authors":"Noreen Kamal, ACTEAST Collaborators, Elena A Cora, Simone Alim, Judah Goldstein, David Volders, Shadi Aljendi, Heather Williams, Patrick Fok, Etienne Van Der Linde, Trish Helm-Neima, Tania Chandler, Alix Carter, Renee Cashin, Brian Metcalfe, Julie Savoie, Wendy Simpkin, Fraser Clift, Cassie Chisholm, Michael D. Hill, Bijoy K Menon, Stephen J. Phillips","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.13.24313666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: An evidence-to-practice gap exists in acute ischemic stroke treatment, and improvements in access and efficiency of treatment with iv thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is needed. The objective of this study was to improve access and efficiency of ischemic stroke treatment across four Atlantic Canadian Provinces. Methods: A stepped-wedge cluster trial was conducted over 30 months with 3 clusters covering 34 sites. The trial was conducted across all 4 Atlantic Canadian provinces: Nova Scotia (NS), New Brunswick (NB), Prince Edward Island (PE), and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL). The design was quasi-randomized, with each cluster associated with one or more provinces: cluster 1 — NS; cluster 2 — NB and PE; and cluster 3 — NL. The patient population was all ischemic stroke patients across all 4 provinces. The intervention was a 6-month modified Quality Improvement Collaborative (mQIC), which was modified from the Breakthrough Series Collaborative to be half of the 1-year period and conducted virtually. The intervention consisted of assembling an interdisciplinary improvement team, 2 full-day workshops, webinars, and virtual site visits. Suggested changes included 6 process improvement strategies. Results: The proportion of patients that received treatment did not increase significantly with the intervention [0.4% increase for patients that received thrombolysis and/or EVT (p=0.68)]. Median door-to-needle time was reduced by 9.2 minutes with the intervention (p=0.01). Cluster 3 saw the greatest improvements in both access and efficiency. Conclusions: A mQIC intervention resulted in improvement of process measures like door-to-needle time. Quality improvement initiatives may need to be longer to see improvements in proportion of patients treated. Tailored interventions for each health system can ensure that each system sees improvement. In-person activities might be critical to ensure fidelity of the intervention.","PeriodicalId":501556,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.13.24313666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An evidence-to-practice gap exists in acute ischemic stroke treatment, and improvements in access and efficiency of treatment with iv thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is needed. The objective of this study was to improve access and efficiency of ischemic stroke treatment across four Atlantic Canadian Provinces. Methods: A stepped-wedge cluster trial was conducted over 30 months with 3 clusters covering 34 sites. The trial was conducted across all 4 Atlantic Canadian provinces: Nova Scotia (NS), New Brunswick (NB), Prince Edward Island (PE), and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL). The design was quasi-randomized, with each cluster associated with one or more provinces: cluster 1 — NS; cluster 2 — NB and PE; and cluster 3 — NL. The patient population was all ischemic stroke patients across all 4 provinces. The intervention was a 6-month modified Quality Improvement Collaborative (mQIC), which was modified from the Breakthrough Series Collaborative to be half of the 1-year period and conducted virtually. The intervention consisted of assembling an interdisciplinary improvement team, 2 full-day workshops, webinars, and virtual site visits. Suggested changes included 6 process improvement strategies. Results: The proportion of patients that received treatment did not increase significantly with the intervention [0.4% increase for patients that received thrombolysis and/or EVT (p=0.68)]. Median door-to-needle time was reduced by 9.2 minutes with the intervention (p=0.01). Cluster 3 saw the greatest improvements in both access and efficiency. Conclusions: A mQIC intervention resulted in improvement of process measures like door-to-needle time. Quality improvement initiatives may need to be longer to see improvements in proportion of patients treated. Tailored interventions for each health system can ensure that each system sees improvement. In-person activities might be critical to ensure fidelity of the intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善加拿大四省急性缺血性脑卒中治疗的可及性和效率:阶梯式楔形试验
背景:急性缺血性脑卒中治疗存在证据与实践之间的差距,需要改善静脉溶栓和血管内血栓切除术(EVT)的可及性和治疗效率。本研究旨在改善加拿大大西洋四省缺血性中风治疗的可及性和效率。方法:进行了为期 30 个月的阶梯式楔形集群试验,3 个集群覆盖 34 个地点。试验在加拿大大西洋四省进行:新斯科舍省(NS)、新不伦瑞克省(NB)、爱德华王子岛省(PE)以及纽芬兰和拉布拉多省(NL)。研究采用准随机设计,每个群组与一个或多个省份相关联:群组 1 - 新斯科舍省;群组 2 - 新不伦瑞克省和爱德华王子岛省;群组 3 - 纽芬兰省和拉布拉多半岛。患者为所有 4 个省的所有缺血性脑卒中患者。干预措施是为期 6 个月的改良质量改进协作项目(mQIC),该项目由 "突破系列协作项目 "修改而成,为期 1 年,其中一半时间以虚拟方式进行。干预措施包括组建跨学科改进团队、举办 2 次全天研讨会、网络研讨会和虚拟实地考察。建议的变革包括 6 项流程改进策略。结果:干预后,接受治疗的患者比例没有明显增加[接受溶栓和/或EVT治疗的患者比例增加了0.4%(P=0.68)]。干预后,从门口到进针的中位时间缩短了 9.2 分钟(P=0.01)。第 3 组的就诊率和效率都得到了最大改善。结论:mQIC 干预措施改善了流程指标,如门到针时间。质量改进措施可能需要更长的时间才能改善患者的治疗比例。为每个医疗系统量身定制的干预措施可确保每个系统都能看到改善。亲临现场的活动可能对确保干预的忠实性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems on the Performance of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Yumbe Regional referral hospital; A Pre-post quasi-experimental study design Plaintiff experiences of the medico-legal environment in Ireland “We’re here to help them if they want to come”: A qualitative exploration of hospital staff perceptions and experiences with outpatient non-attendance Improving Access and Efficiency of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Across Four Canadian Provinces: A Stepped-Wedge Trial I am a quarterback: A mixed methods study of death investigators' communication with family members of young sudden cardiac death victims from suspected heritable causes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1