Multilevel Modelling in Economics: A Way to Test the Natural-Partner Hypothesis

Alejandra Martínez-Martínez, Silviano Esteve-Pérez, Salvador Gil-Pareja, Rafael Llorca-Vivero
{"title":"Multilevel Modelling in Economics: A Way to Test the Natural-Partner Hypothesis","authors":"Alejandra Martínez-Martínez, Silviano Esteve-Pérez, Salvador Gil-Pareja, Rafael Llorca-Vivero","doi":"10.1007/s11294-024-09907-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study applies multilevel modelling to the analysis of trade flows. This methodology can complement the use of the standard gravity equation in addressing the influence of geographical distance on the impact of trade agreements on bilateral trade (the natural-partner hypothesis). The analysis suggests that the simplest, most obvious, and best way to nest country pairs with international trade data is by distance. To this end, a sample of 69 countries with data on domestic flows over the period 1986–2016 was used. This sample accounts for around 85% of world trade data. The estimations suggest that the pro-trade effects of preferential trade agreements decrease with distance to trade partners, while this does not occur with the multilateral trading system. What is more interesting is that the former result only holds for the preferential trade agreements involving goods, which supports the natural-trading partner hypothesis, but not for those that include services. In the latter case, the impact increases with distance. This suggests that deeper preferential trade agreements reduce the cost of distance as a barrier to trade, which probably reflects cultural (regulation) distance.</p>","PeriodicalId":45656,"journal":{"name":"International Advances in Economic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Advances in Economic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-024-09907-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study applies multilevel modelling to the analysis of trade flows. This methodology can complement the use of the standard gravity equation in addressing the influence of geographical distance on the impact of trade agreements on bilateral trade (the natural-partner hypothesis). The analysis suggests that the simplest, most obvious, and best way to nest country pairs with international trade data is by distance. To this end, a sample of 69 countries with data on domestic flows over the period 1986–2016 was used. This sample accounts for around 85% of world trade data. The estimations suggest that the pro-trade effects of preferential trade agreements decrease with distance to trade partners, while this does not occur with the multilateral trading system. What is more interesting is that the former result only holds for the preferential trade agreements involving goods, which supports the natural-trading partner hypothesis, but not for those that include services. In the latter case, the impact increases with distance. This suggests that deeper preferential trade agreements reduce the cost of distance as a barrier to trade, which probably reflects cultural (regulation) distance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济学中的多层次建模:测试自然伙伴假说的一种方法
本研究将多层次模型应用于贸易流动分析。这种方法可以补充标准引力方程的使用,以解决地理距离对贸易协定对双边贸易影响的影响(自然伙伴假说)。分析表明,利用国际贸易数据对国家对进行嵌套的最简单、最明显和最好的方法是按距离进行嵌套。为此,我们使用了有 1986-2016 年期间国内流量数据的 69 个国家作为样本。该样本约占世界贸易数据的 85%。估算结果表明,优惠贸易协定的贸易促进效应会随着与贸易伙伴的距离缩短而降低,而多边贸易体系则不会出现这种情况。更有趣的是,前一个结果只适用于涉及货物的优惠贸易协定,这支持了自然贸易伙伴假说,但不适用于涉及服务的优惠贸易协定。在后一种情况下,影响随着距离的增加而增加。这表明,更深入的优惠贸易协定降低了距离作为贸易壁垒的成本,这可能反映了文化(监管)距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: International Advances in Economic Research (IAER) was established to promote the dissemination of economic and financial research within the international community. Founded in 1995 by the International Atlantic Economic Society, a need was identified to provide the latest research on today''s economic policies and tomorrow''s economic and financial conditions. Economists can no longer be concerned with professional developments only in their home country. Research by scholars in one country can easily have implications for other countries, yet often vital results are not shared. Economic restructuring in a shrinking world demands close analysis and careful interpretation. In IAER, authors from around the globe look at these issues, coming together in the cross-fertilization of multinational ideas. The journal provides economists, financial specialists, and scholars in related disciplines with much-needed opportunities to share their insights with worldwide colleagues. Policy-oriented, empirical, and theoretical research papers in all economic and financial areas are welcome, without regard to methodological preferences or school of thought. All manuscripts are submitted to a double-blind, peer review process. In addition to formal publication of full-length articles, IAER provides an opportunity for less formal communication through its Research Notes section. A small point may not be worthy of a full-length, formal paper but is important enough to warrant dissemination to other researchers. Research in progress may be of interest to other scholars in the field. A research approach ending in negative results needs to be shared to save others similar pitfalls. Research Notes has been established to facilitate this form of communication. The section provides a means by which short manuscripts of less than 200 words can quickly appear in IAER. The review process for these shorter manu scripts is usually completed within 30 days. Officially cited as: Int Adv Econ Res
期刊最新文献
A Note on Foreign Capital, Economic Growth, and Convergence: A Simple Model with Endogenous Growth Modelling Loans to Non-Financial Corporations in the Eurozone: A Long-Memory Approach Manufacturing and Economic Growth in Selected MENA Countries: A Kaldorian Approach How do Bank Profits Change in Response to Changes in Interest Rates? Multilevel Modelling in Economics: A Way to Test the Natural-Partner Hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1