Patient screening and assessment for home dialysis therapies: A scoping review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Peritoneal Dialysis International Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1177/08968608241266130
Ryan Ting, Megan Borkum, Lian Ting Ni, Adeera Levin
{"title":"Patient screening and assessment for home dialysis therapies: A scoping review.","authors":"Ryan Ting, Megan Borkum, Lian Ting Ni, Adeera Levin","doi":"10.1177/08968608241266130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Home dialysis therapies have limited uptake in most regions despite recognized benefits such as increasing patients' independence, and several domains of quality of life with cost savings in some systems.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a scoping review of published literature to identify tools and guides used in systematically screening and assessing patient suitability for home dialysis. A secondary objective was to explore barriers and enablers associated with the home dialysis assessment process. It is important to identify gaps in current research to pose pertinent questions for future work in the field.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Online databases Embase, Medline (Ovid), and CINAHL were used to identify articles published between January 2007 to May 2023. A total of 23 peer-reviewed primary and secondary studies that investigated screening or selection for patients > 18 years old with kidney failure for home dialysis met the study inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The studies consisted of secondary studies (n = 10), observational studies (n = 8), and survey-based studies (n = 5). The major themes identified that influence patient screening and assessment for home dialysis candidacy included: screening tools and guidelines (n = 8), relative contraindications (n = 4), patient or program education (n = 9), and socioeconomic factors (n = 2).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Consistent with the scoping review methodology, the methodological quality of included studies was not assessed. The possible omission of evidence in languages other than English is a limitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review identified tools and factors that potentially guide the assessment process for home dialysis candidacy. Patient screening and assessment for home dialysis requires a comprehensive evaluation of clinical, psychosocial, and logistical factors. Further research is required to validate and refine existing tools to establish standardized patient screening criteria and evaluation processes. Up-to-date training and education for healthcare providers and patients are needed to improve the utilization of home dialysis and ensure optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19969,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","volume":" ","pages":"8968608241266130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608241266130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Home dialysis therapies have limited uptake in most regions despite recognized benefits such as increasing patients' independence, and several domains of quality of life with cost savings in some systems.

Objective: To perform a scoping review of published literature to identify tools and guides used in systematically screening and assessing patient suitability for home dialysis. A secondary objective was to explore barriers and enablers associated with the home dialysis assessment process. It is important to identify gaps in current research to pose pertinent questions for future work in the field.

Design: Online databases Embase, Medline (Ovid), and CINAHL were used to identify articles published between January 2007 to May 2023. A total of 23 peer-reviewed primary and secondary studies that investigated screening or selection for patients > 18 years old with kidney failure for home dialysis met the study inclusion criteria.

Results: The studies consisted of secondary studies (n = 10), observational studies (n = 8), and survey-based studies (n = 5). The major themes identified that influence patient screening and assessment for home dialysis candidacy included: screening tools and guidelines (n = 8), relative contraindications (n = 4), patient or program education (n = 9), and socioeconomic factors (n = 2).

Limitations: Consistent with the scoping review methodology, the methodological quality of included studies was not assessed. The possible omission of evidence in languages other than English is a limitation.

Conclusion: This scoping review identified tools and factors that potentially guide the assessment process for home dialysis candidacy. Patient screening and assessment for home dialysis requires a comprehensive evaluation of clinical, psychosocial, and logistical factors. Further research is required to validate and refine existing tools to establish standardized patient screening criteria and evaluation processes. Up-to-date training and education for healthcare providers and patients are needed to improve the utilization of home dialysis and ensure optimal outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭透析疗法的患者筛查与评估:范围综述。
背景:尽管家庭透析疗法具有公认的益处,如提高患者的独立性和多个领域的生活质量,并在某些系统中节约成本,但在大多数地区,家庭透析疗法的使用率有限:对已发表的文献进行范围界定,确定用于系统筛选和评估患者是否适合家庭透析的工具和指南。次要目的是探讨与家庭透析评估流程相关的障碍和促进因素。重要的是要找出当前研究中的不足,为该领域未来的工作提出相关问题:设计:使用在线数据库 Embase、Medline (Ovid) 和 CINAHL 查找 2007 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月间发表的文章。共有 23 项经同行评审的主要和次要研究符合研究纳入标准,这些研究调查了筛选或选择 18 岁以上肾衰竭患者进行家庭透析的情况:这些研究包括二次研究(10 项)、观察性研究(8 项)和基于调查的研究(5 项)。已确定的影响患者筛查和评估是否适合家庭透析的主要主题包括:筛查工具和指南(8 项)、相对禁忌症(4 项)、患者或项目教育(9 项)以及社会经济因素(2 项):与范围界定综述方法一致,未对纳入研究的方法学质量进行评估。除英语外,可能遗漏了其他语言的证据:本次范围界定审查确定了可能指导家庭透析候选资格评估过程的工具和因素。患者筛查和家庭透析评估需要对临床、社会心理和后勤因素进行综合评估。需要进一步研究验证和完善现有工具,以建立标准化的患者筛选标准和评估流程。需要对医疗服务提供者和患者进行最新的培训和教育,以提高家庭透析的利用率并确保最佳治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Peritoneal Dialysis International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peritoneal Dialysis International (PDI) is an international publication dedicated to peritoneal dialysis. PDI welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of peritoneal dialysis from scientists working in the peritoneal dialysis field around the world. Peritoneal Dialysis International is included in Index Medicus and indexed in Current Contents/Clinical Practice, the Science Citation Index, and Excerpta Medica (Nephrology/Urology Core Journal). It is also abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts (CA), as well as being indexed in Embase as a priority journal.
期刊最新文献
Iodine starch test in a peritoneal dialysis-related hydrothorax. Pulsed peritoneal dialysis in an experimental rat model: A first experience. Severe uterovaginal prolapse and start of peritoneal dialysis: Role of colpocleisis surgery. Report of two cases. Colostomy formation in a peritoneal dialysis patient. Establishing a peritoneal dialysis technique survival core outcome measure: A standardised outcomes in nephrology-peritoneal dialysis consensus workshop report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1