Respiratory physiological mechanism of two types of equal-intensity inspiratory muscle training in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107747
{"title":"Respiratory physiological mechanism of two types of equal-intensity inspiratory muscle training in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the respiratory physiological changes resulting from short-term inspiratory resistance training (R-IMT) and inspiratory threshold training (T-IMT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to compare the mechanisms of the two training methods.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>A total of 75 stable patients with COPD combined with inspiratory muscle weakness were randomly allocated to three groups: R-IMT (n = 26), T-IMT (n = 24), and control (n = 25). Before and after 8 weeks of inspiratory muscle training(IMT), cardiopulmonary exercise tests were conducted to assess respiratory patterns, respiratory central drive, exercise tolerance, and ventilation efficiency.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After 8 weeks of IMT, Inspiratory muscle strength, represented by MIP (maximum inspiratory mouth pressure) and exercise capacity increased during exercise in both IMT groups (P &lt; 0.05). In the R-IMT group, inspiratory time (Ti) prolonged (P &lt; 0.05), tidal volume (Vt) increased (P &lt; 0.05), ventilation efficiency (represented by ventilation-center coupling) increased (P &lt; 0.05) during exercise. Conversely, the T-IMT group did not exhibit any of these changes after IMT (P &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In summary, the improvement in exercise tolerance was associated with an increase in inspiratory muscle reserve in both R-IMT and T-IMT. However, only R-IMT was associated with deeper and slower breathing, as well as improved ventilation efficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124002221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the respiratory physiological changes resulting from short-term inspiratory resistance training (R-IMT) and inspiratory threshold training (T-IMT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to compare the mechanisms of the two training methods.

Patients and methods

A total of 75 stable patients with COPD combined with inspiratory muscle weakness were randomly allocated to three groups: R-IMT (n = 26), T-IMT (n = 24), and control (n = 25). Before and after 8 weeks of inspiratory muscle training(IMT), cardiopulmonary exercise tests were conducted to assess respiratory patterns, respiratory central drive, exercise tolerance, and ventilation efficiency.

Results

After 8 weeks of IMT, Inspiratory muscle strength, represented by MIP (maximum inspiratory mouth pressure) and exercise capacity increased during exercise in both IMT groups (P < 0.05). In the R-IMT group, inspiratory time (Ti) prolonged (P < 0.05), tidal volume (Vt) increased (P < 0.05), ventilation efficiency (represented by ventilation-center coupling) increased (P < 0.05) during exercise. Conversely, the T-IMT group did not exhibit any of these changes after IMT (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

In summary, the improvement in exercise tolerance was associated with an increase in inspiratory muscle reserve in both R-IMT and T-IMT. However, only R-IMT was associated with deeper and slower breathing, as well as improved ventilation efficiency.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种等强度吸气肌训练在慢性阻塞性肺病稳定期患者中的呼吸生理机制。
目的:本研究旨在探讨短期吸气阻力训练(R-IMT)和吸气阈值训练(T-IMT)在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中引起的呼吸生理变化,并比较两种训练方法的机制:将 75 名慢性阻塞性肺病合并吸气肌无力的稳定期患者随机分配到三组:R-IMT组(26人)、T-IMT组(24人)和对照组(25人)。在吸气肌训练(IMT)8周前后,进行心肺运动测试以评估呼吸模式、呼吸中枢驱动力、运动耐量和通气效率:结果:经过 8 周的吸气肌训练后,两组吸气肌训练者的吸气肌力(以 MIP(最大吸气口压)表示)和运动耐量均有所提高(P0.05):总之,在 R-IMT 和 T-IMT 组中,运动耐量的提高与吸气肌肉储备的增加有关。然而,只有 R-IMT 组的呼吸更深更慢,通气效率也有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the acceptability of the changing model of care in cystic fibrosis Efficacy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease and exercise pulmonary hypertension Epistaxis in COVID positive ICU patients, implications, and future interventions Prognostic Role of Pleural Fluid SUVpeak Value obtained from 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with Malignant Pleural Effusion. β-Blockers and Asthma: Surprising findings from the FAERS database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1