An observational cross-sectional study of pharmaceutical waste disposal practices in Australian medical imaging departments: A comparison of community versus hospital practice

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2024.07.009
{"title":"An observational cross-sectional study of pharmaceutical waste disposal practices in Australian medical imaging departments: A comparison of community versus hospital practice","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Pharmaceuticals are used widely in radiography practice but pose an environmental risk. This study explored Australian radiographers’ environmental attitude, pharmaceutical waste disposal practices, and knowledge and concern regarding the environmental impact of these pharmaceuticals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study utilised an anonymous, online questionnaire developed from two validated questionnaires. Participants (n = 150) held current registration with the Medical Radiation Practice Board of Australia and were working eight or more hours per week in a medical imaging practice (public or private).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants did not answer all questions, hence percentages reported reflect the number of counts for each question. Most participants (71.4%; 105/147) disposed of contaminated pharmaceutical waste in clinical waste bins with 17.1% (15/146) disposing of it down drains. More hospital radiographers 13.54% (13/96) reported this disposal compared with 2.08% (1/48) of community-based radiographers (Fisher's Exact Test, p = 0.035). There was no difference in disposal of non-contaminated waste between practice settings - general waste bin (68.5%; 100/150), recycling bin (28.8%; 42/146), and clinical waste bin (41.8%; 61/146). Participants lacked knowledge of impacts on the food chain and the health of humans and wildlife. Only 34.7% (48/138) of participants expressed concern regarding the impacts of human excreted pharmaceuticals on the environment compared with 65.8% (98/149) regarding impacts from incorrect disposal. Many (18.4%; 25/136) reported having received no information on correct disposal of pharmaceutical waste.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study highlighted participants’ lack of knowledge on how pharmaceuticals enter the natural environment and the subsequent impacts on the environment and on the health of humans, and flora and fauna. They lacked knowledge of correct pharmaceutical waste disposal methods, but most agreed it was their professional responsibility to dispose of waste correctly.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Improving radiographers’ pharmaceutical waste disposal practices through education and professional support will reduce environmental impacts and also provide financial co-benefits if non-contaminated waste is recycled where possible and not incinerated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001834/pdfft?md5=f2a2c647bf234f5f37c641e77afe05bd&pid=1-s2.0-S1078817424001834-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Pharmaceuticals are used widely in radiography practice but pose an environmental risk. This study explored Australian radiographers’ environmental attitude, pharmaceutical waste disposal practices, and knowledge and concern regarding the environmental impact of these pharmaceuticals.

Methods

This study utilised an anonymous, online questionnaire developed from two validated questionnaires. Participants (n = 150) held current registration with the Medical Radiation Practice Board of Australia and were working eight or more hours per week in a medical imaging practice (public or private).

Results

Participants did not answer all questions, hence percentages reported reflect the number of counts for each question. Most participants (71.4%; 105/147) disposed of contaminated pharmaceutical waste in clinical waste bins with 17.1% (15/146) disposing of it down drains. More hospital radiographers 13.54% (13/96) reported this disposal compared with 2.08% (1/48) of community-based radiographers (Fisher's Exact Test, p = 0.035). There was no difference in disposal of non-contaminated waste between practice settings - general waste bin (68.5%; 100/150), recycling bin (28.8%; 42/146), and clinical waste bin (41.8%; 61/146). Participants lacked knowledge of impacts on the food chain and the health of humans and wildlife. Only 34.7% (48/138) of participants expressed concern regarding the impacts of human excreted pharmaceuticals on the environment compared with 65.8% (98/149) regarding impacts from incorrect disposal. Many (18.4%; 25/136) reported having received no information on correct disposal of pharmaceutical waste.

Conclusion

This study highlighted participants’ lack of knowledge on how pharmaceuticals enter the natural environment and the subsequent impacts on the environment and on the health of humans, and flora and fauna. They lacked knowledge of correct pharmaceutical waste disposal methods, but most agreed it was their professional responsibility to dispose of waste correctly.

Implications for practice

Improving radiographers’ pharmaceutical waste disposal practices through education and professional support will reduce environmental impacts and also provide financial co-benefits if non-contaminated waste is recycled where possible and not incinerated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚医学影像部门药物废物处理方法的横断面观察研究:社区与医院实践的比较。
简介:药品在放射学实践中被广泛使用,但会对环境造成危害。本研究探讨了澳大利亚放射技师的环保态度、药品废物处理方法以及对这些药品对环境影响的了解和关注:本研究使用了一份匿名在线问卷,该问卷由两份经过验证的问卷发展而来。参与者(n = 150)目前已在澳大利亚医学放射实践委员会注册,每周在医学影像实践机构(公立或私立)工作 8 小时或以上:结果:参与者没有回答所有问题,因此报告的百分比反映了每个问题的统计人数。大多数参与者(71.4%;105/147)将受污染的药物废物扔进医疗废物箱,17.1%(15/146)扔进下水道。与社区放射技师的 2.08%(1/48)相比,更多医院放射技师(13.54%,13/96)报告了这种处理方式(费雪精确检验,p = 0.035)。在处理未受污染的废物方面,不同执业环境的参与者没有差异--一般废物箱(68.5%;100/150)、回收箱(28.8%;42/146)和临床废物箱(41.8%;61/146)。参与者缺乏对食物链以及人类和野生动物健康影响的了解。只有 34.7%(48/138)的参与者对人类排泄的药物对环境的影响表示担忧,而 65.8%(98/149)的参与者对错误处置药物对环境的影响表示担忧。许多人(18.4%;25/136)表示没有收到过关于正确处置药物废物的信息:本研究强调了参与者对药物如何进入自然环境以及随后对环境、人类健康和动植物健康的影响缺乏了解。他们缺乏正确处理药物废物方法的知识,但大多数人都认为正确处理废物是他们的职业责任:实践启示:通过教育和专业支持改善放射技师的药物废物处理方法将减少对环境的影响,如果尽可能回收未受污染的废物而不是进行焚烧,还将带来经济上的共同利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
An enquiry into the usefulness of an information portal for Deaf and hard of hearing people prior to x-ray examinations and improvement ideas Morphometry-based radiomics for predicting prognosis in soft tissue sarcomas of extremities following radiotherapy Virtual reality simulation for mastery learning of wrist radiograph technique An initial exploration of factors that may impact radiographer performance in reporting mammograms Diagnostic radiography workforce expectations of learners against the 2023 HCPC standards of proficiency: Results of a UK Delphi study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1