The Development and Validation of a Novel Training Infographic for the Physician Global Visual Analog Scale in Psoriatic Arthritis.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Journal of Rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3899/jrheum.2024-0152
Shannon Gunawardana, Philip S Helliwell, Marc R Kok, Marijn Vis, Andrew Allard, Akpabio Akpabio, Aallaa Alsaffar, Jessica C Ellis, Fazira R Kasiem, Rachel Macmillan, Ben Mulhearn, Aine Gorman, Laura C Coates, William Tillett
{"title":"The Development and Validation of a Novel Training Infographic for the Physician Global Visual Analog Scale in Psoriatic Arthritis.","authors":"Shannon Gunawardana, Philip S Helliwell, Marc R Kok, Marijn Vis, Andrew Allard, Akpabio Akpabio, Aallaa Alsaffar, Jessica C Ellis, Fazira R Kasiem, Rachel Macmillan, Ben Mulhearn, Aine Gorman, Laura C Coates, William Tillett","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-0152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogenous condition with musculoskeletal and skin manifestations. The physician global visual analog scale (VAS) is an important component of many composite scores used in clinical trials and observational studies. Currently, no training material exists to standardize this assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Psoriatic Arthritis Validation of Physician Global VAS (PAVLOVAS) project describes the development of a novel training infographic with stakeholder involvement, which was then evaluated in a Latin square design in which 20 patients with PsA were assessed by 10 clinicians. For each group of 10 patients, 5 assessors conducted traditional assessment (consisting of 66/68-joint count, body surface area, Leeds Enthesitis Index, and dactylitis and nail counts) and 5 assessors conducted a standardized, thorough general examination informed by the infographic. Assessors switched assessment type between groups. The 3-item (3VAS) and 4VAS informed by traditional and infographic methods were compared, alongside other composite scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was strong agreement between traditional and infographic physician global VAS (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.69, <i>P</i> = 0.01). This improved to very strong agreement when incorporated into the 3VAS (ICC 0.99, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and 4VAS (ICC 0.99, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The duration of assessment was significantly less for the infographic vs traditional groups (6.5 vs 7.8 mins, <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was moderately high agreement between the 3VAS and 4VAS categories of disease activity, with the same categories defined by Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA; χ<sup>2</sup> 17.0, <i>P</i> = 0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our group developed and validated a novel training infographic that informs a briefer assessment of the physician global VAS than traditional assessments. This tool has potential applications in training and routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-0152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogenous condition with musculoskeletal and skin manifestations. The physician global visual analog scale (VAS) is an important component of many composite scores used in clinical trials and observational studies. Currently, no training material exists to standardize this assessment.

Methods: The Psoriatic Arthritis Validation of Physician Global VAS (PAVLOVAS) project describes the development of a novel training infographic with stakeholder involvement, which was then evaluated in a Latin square design in which 20 patients with PsA were assessed by 10 clinicians. For each group of 10 patients, 5 assessors conducted traditional assessment (consisting of 66/68-joint count, body surface area, Leeds Enthesitis Index, and dactylitis and nail counts) and 5 assessors conducted a standardized, thorough general examination informed by the infographic. Assessors switched assessment type between groups. The 3-item (3VAS) and 4VAS informed by traditional and infographic methods were compared, alongside other composite scores.

Results: There was strong agreement between traditional and infographic physician global VAS (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.69, P = 0.01). This improved to very strong agreement when incorporated into the 3VAS (ICC 0.99, P < 0.001) and 4VAS (ICC 0.99, P < 0.001). The duration of assessment was significantly less for the infographic vs traditional groups (6.5 vs 7.8 mins, P < 0.001). There was moderately high agreement between the 3VAS and 4VAS categories of disease activity, with the same categories defined by Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA; χ2 17.0, P = 0.049).

Conclusion: Our group developed and validated a novel training infographic that informs a briefer assessment of the physician global VAS than traditional assessments. This tool has potential applications in training and routine clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发并验证用于银屑病关节炎医生视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 的新型培训信息图表。
目的:银屑病关节炎(PsA)是一种具有肌肉骨骼和皮肤表现的异质性疾病。医生视觉模拟量表(VAS)是临床试验和观察性研究中许多综合评分的重要组成部分。目前还没有培训材料对这一评估进行标准化:方法:在利益相关者的参与下开发了一种新颖的培训信息图表,然后在拉丁方形设计中进行评估,由 10 名临床医生对 20 名 PsA 患者进行评估。在每组 10 名患者中,5 名评估者进行 "传统 "评估(包括 66/68 个关节计数、体表面积、利兹关节炎指数、趾关节炎和指甲计数),5 名评估者根据信息图进行标准化、全面的全身检查。评估人员在各组之间切换评估类型。对传统方法和信息图谱方法得出的 3VAS 和 4VAS 以及其他综合评分进行了比较:结果:传统和信息图示医师 VAS 之间的一致性很高(ICC:0.686,p=0.008)。当纳入 3VAS 时,两者的一致性提高到了非常高的水平(ICC:0.989, p2:17.0, p=0.049):本研究开发并验证了一种新颖的培训信息图,与传统的评估方法相比,它能提供更简短的医生全局 VAS 评估信息。该工具有望应用于培训和日常临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rheumatology
Journal of Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman. The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 41 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
期刊最新文献
Disparities in time to diagnosis of Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis. Potential Efficacy of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of a Patient With Coexisting Peripheral and Axial Spondyloarthritis and Ulcerative Colitis. Anifrolumab in Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Real-World, Multicenter Study. Scleroderma Renal Crisis: Clues From the Physical Exam. Systemic Sclerosis Sine Scleroderma: A Time of Reappraisal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1