首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Rheumatology最新文献

英文 中文
Comparing Novel and Legacy Health Assessment Questionnaire Scoring Methods: A Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort Study. 比较新的和传统的健康评估问卷评分方法:一项硬皮病患者为中心的干预网络队列研究。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-15 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-1069
Yining Lu, Daphna Harel, Klint Kanopka, Marie-Eve Carrier, Linda Kwakkenbos, Susan J Bartlett, Catherine Fortuné, Amy Gietzen, Geneviève Guillot, Amanda Lawrie-Jones, Vanessa L Malcarne, Maureen D Mayes, Michelle Richard, Maureen Sauvé, James Stempel, Luc Mouthon, Andrea Benedetti, Brett D Thombs

Objective: To compare 5 Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scoring methods to measure functional disability among people with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Methods: Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort participants completed the HAQ (20 items, 8 domains) at enrollment. We calculated (1) HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores, which sum the highest item score for each domain and account for the use of aids, devices, or assistance; (2) HAQ-Alternative Disability Index (HAQ-ADI) scores, which are calculated similarly but do not account for aids, devices, or assistance; and (3) modified HAQ (mHAQ) scores, which are based on 1 administered item from each domain, as well as a simple summed score of all 20 items. We then compared these scores and those generated from an item response tree (IRTree) on convergent validity with physical function, pain interference, and hand function using Pearson correlations.

Results: IRTree-based scores were highly correlated (r 0.90-0.95) with other scoring procedures and showed moderate-to-strong correlations with all external measures (r 0.68-0.80). There was no evidence of a difference between IRTree-based and HAQ-DI correlations with external measures. IRTree-based scores performed better than HAQ-ADI, mHAQ, and summed scores for physical function and pain interference but worse for hand function.

Conclusion: IRTree-based scoring is a novel approach that incorporates information from all HAQ items and whether participants use aids, devices, or assistance. Its association with external measures, however, did not differ from the standard HAQ-DI. HAQ-DI scoring is easy to implement, and extensive comparative data are available, making it the preferred scoring method.

目的:比较五种健康评估问卷(HAQ)评分方法对系统性硬化症(SSc,硬皮病)患者功能障碍的影响。方法:以硬皮病患者为中心的干预网络队列参与者在入组时填写健康评估问卷(8个领域,20个项目)。我们计算了HAQ残疾指数(HAQ- di)得分,它将每个领域的最高项目得分相加,并考虑到辅助工具、设备或辅助的使用;替代残疾指数(HAQ-ADI)分数,其计算方法类似,但不考虑辅助,设备或协助;修改HAQ (MHAQ)分数,它基于来自每个域的一个管理项目,以及所有20个项目的简单总和分数。然后,我们将这些分数与从项目反应树(IRTree)生成的分数进行比较,使用Pearson的相关性对身体功能、疼痛干扰和手功能的收敛效度进行比较。结果:基于irtree的评分与其他评分方法高度相关(r = 0.90至0.95),并与所有外部测量显示中等至强相关性(r = 0.68至0.80)。没有证据表明基于irtree和HAQ-DI与外部测量的相关性存在差异。基于irtree的评分在身体功能和疼痛干扰方面优于HAQ-ADI、MHAQ和综合评分,但在手功能方面较差。结论:基于irtree的评分是一种新颖的方法,它结合了所有HAQ项目的信息,以及参与者是否使用了辅助工具、设备或辅助。然而,它与外部测量的关联与标准的HAQ-DI没有区别。HAQ-DI评分容易实施,可获得广泛的比较数据,是首选的评分方法。
{"title":"Comparing Novel and Legacy Health Assessment Questionnaire Scoring Methods: A Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort Study.","authors":"Yining Lu, Daphna Harel, Klint Kanopka, Marie-Eve Carrier, Linda Kwakkenbos, Susan J Bartlett, Catherine Fortuné, Amy Gietzen, Geneviève Guillot, Amanda Lawrie-Jones, Vanessa L Malcarne, Maureen D Mayes, Michelle Richard, Maureen Sauvé, James Stempel, Luc Mouthon, Andrea Benedetti, Brett D Thombs","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-1069","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-1069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare 5 Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scoring methods to measure functional disability among people with systemic sclerosis (SSc).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort participants completed the HAQ (20 items, 8 domains) at enrollment. We calculated (1) HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores, which sum the highest item score for each domain and account for the use of aids, devices, or assistance; (2) HAQ-Alternative Disability Index (HAQ-ADI) scores, which are calculated similarly but do not account for aids, devices, or assistance; and (3) modified HAQ (mHAQ) scores, which are based on 1 administered item from each domain, as well as a simple summed score of all 20 items. We then compared these scores and those generated from an item response tree (IRTree) on convergent validity with physical function, pain interference, and hand function using Pearson correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IRTree-based scores were highly correlated (<i>r</i> 0.90-0.95) with other scoring procedures and showed moderate-to-strong correlations with all external measures (<i>r</i> 0.68-0.80). There was no evidence of a difference between IRTree-based and HAQ-DI correlations with external measures. IRTree-based scores performed better than HAQ-ADI, mHAQ, and summed scores for physical function and pain interference but worse for hand function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IRTree-based scoring is a novel approach that incorporates information from all HAQ items and whether participants use aids, devices, or assistance. Its association with external measures, however, did not differ from the standard HAQ-DI. HAQ-DI scoring is easy to implement, and extensive comparative data are available, making it the preferred scoring method.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Global Survey of Quinacrine Use in Systemic and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus. 奎宁在系统性红斑狼疮和皮肤性红斑狼疮中的全球应用调查。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-0757
Sarah Aly, Gilda Parastandehchehr, Sasha Bernatsky, Évelyne Vinet, Laurent Arnaud, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau, Paul R Fortin, John A Reynolds, J Carter Thorne, Zahi Touma, Daniel Wallace, Victoria P Werth, Wendy Singer, Arielle Mendel

Objective: Experiences with the antimalarial quinacrine for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) remain underexplored. We evaluated and compared dermatologists' and rheumatologists' experiences with quinacrine in managing SLE and/or CLE.

Methods: We sent a structured survey to 102 SLE specialists within the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) and the Canadian Network for Improved Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (CaNIOS), and 200 members of the Rheumatologic Dermatology Society (RDS). Participants responded to questions on self-reported quinacrine prescription history, perceived clinical benefit, reasons for drug discontinuation, and barriers to prescribing.

Results: A total of 20 dermatologists from RDS and 40 SLICC and CaNIOS members responded to the survey. All RDS participants (100%) had previously prescribed quinacrine, compared to 17/40 (43%) of SLICC/CaNIOS participants. The majority of quinacrine prescribers (100% RDS, 12/17 [71%] SLICC/CaNIOS) had prescribed quinacrine in combination with another antimalarial. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or chloroquine (CQ) intolerance (65% RDS, 47% SLICC/CaNIOS) and HCQ/CQ-related retinal toxicity (50% RDS, 24% SLICC/CaNIOS) were other reasons for prescribing quinacrine. Clinical benefit was reported by 19/20 (95%) of RDS and 12/17 (71%) of SLICC/CaNIOS clinicians, and discontinuations were less frequent among RDS (5/20 [25%] reported none) compared to SLICC/CaNIOS (all 17 reported ≥ 1). Availability and cost of quinacrine were primary prescribing barriers.

Conclusion: Surveyed dermatologists and rheumatologists differed in their experience with quinacrine for CLE and SLE, respectively. Availability remains a key barrier to prescribing, underscoring the need to address supply issues and conduct further research to optimize quinacrine use in SLE and CLE.

目的:抗疟药奎宁治疗系统性和皮肤性红斑狼疮(SLE和CLE)的经验尚不充分。我们评估并比较了皮肤科医生和风湿病医生在治疗SLE和/或CLE时使用奎尼平的经验。方法:我们向系统性红斑狼疮国际合作诊所(SLICC)和加拿大系统性红斑狼疮改善结局网络(CaNIOS)的102名狼疮专家和200名风湿病皮肤病学会(RDS)成员发送了一份结构化调查。参与者回答了关于自我报告的奎纳卡因处方史、临床获益、停药原因和开处方的障碍等问题。结果:共有来自RDS的20名皮肤科医生和40名SLICC和CaNIOS成员回复了调查。所有RDS参与者(100%)以前都开过奎宁,而SLICC/CaNIOS参与者中只有17/40(43%)开过奎宁。大多数开处方者(100% RDS, 12/17 [71%] SLICC/CaNIOS)联合使用另一种抗疟药。羟氯喹或氯喹不耐受(65% RDS, 47% SLICC/CaNIOS)和视网膜毒性(50% RDS, 24% SLICC/CaNIOS)是处方奎宁的其他原因。19/20(95%)的RDS临床医生和12/17(71%)的SLICC/CaNIOS临床医生报告了临床获益,与SLICC/CaNIOS相比,RDS临床医生的停药频率较低(5/20[25%]报告无停药)(所有17名报告≥1)。可获得性和成本是主要的处方障碍。结论:接受调查的皮肤科医生和风湿病医生在使用阿奎宁治疗CLE和SLE方面的经验各不相同。可获得性仍然是处方的关键障碍,强调需要解决供应问题并进行进一步研究以优化在SLE和CLE中的使用。
{"title":"A Global Survey of Quinacrine Use in Systemic and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.","authors":"Sarah Aly, Gilda Parastandehchehr, Sasha Bernatsky, Évelyne Vinet, Laurent Arnaud, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau, Paul R Fortin, John A Reynolds, J Carter Thorne, Zahi Touma, Daniel Wallace, Victoria P Werth, Wendy Singer, Arielle Mendel","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0757","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0757","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Experiences with the antimalarial quinacrine for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) remain underexplored. We evaluated and compared dermatologists' and rheumatologists' experiences with quinacrine in managing SLE and/or CLE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We sent a structured survey to 102 SLE specialists within the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) and the Canadian Network for Improved Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (CaNIOS), and 200 members of the Rheumatologic Dermatology Society (RDS). Participants responded to questions on self-reported quinacrine prescription history, perceived clinical benefit, reasons for drug discontinuation, and barriers to prescribing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 dermatologists from RDS and 40 SLICC and CaNIOS members responded to the survey. All RDS participants (100%) had previously prescribed quinacrine, compared to 17/40 (43%) of SLICC/CaNIOS participants. The majority of quinacrine prescribers (100% RDS, 12/17 [71%] SLICC/CaNIOS) had prescribed quinacrine in combination with another antimalarial. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or chloroquine (CQ) intolerance (65% RDS, 47% SLICC/CaNIOS) and HCQ/CQ-related retinal toxicity (50% RDS, 24% SLICC/CaNIOS) were other reasons for prescribing quinacrine. Clinical benefit was reported by 19/20 (95%) of RDS and 12/17 (71%) of SLICC/CaNIOS clinicians, and discontinuations were less frequent among RDS (5/20 [25%] reported none) compared to SLICC/CaNIOS (all 17 reported ≥ 1). Availability and cost of quinacrine were primary prescribing barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surveyed dermatologists and rheumatologists differed in their experience with quinacrine for CLE and SLE, respectively. Availability remains a key barrier to prescribing, underscoring the need to address supply issues and conduct further research to optimize quinacrine use in SLE and CLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"292-296"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Individual and Socioecological Resilience in Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Associations With Patient Characteristics and Psychosocial Patient-Reported Outcomes. 儿童期系统性红斑狼疮的个体和社会生态恢复力:与患者特征和患者报告的心理社会结局的关联
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-0375
Isabella Zaffino, Louise Boulard, Joanna Law, Ashley Danguecan, Asha Jeyanathan, Lawrence Ng, Sandra Williams-Reid, Kiah Reid, Angela Cortes, Eugene Cortes, Deborah M Levy, Linda T Hiraki, Andrea M Knight

Objective: This study investigates individual and socioecological resilience and its relationship with sociodemographic and disease characteristics, as well as psychosocial patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE).

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with cSLE, ages 11-22 years, at a Canadian tertiary center from October 2021 to July 2024. The 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) assessed individual resilience. The Child and Youth Resilience Measure-Revised (CYRM-R) assessed socioecological resilience. Linear regression models examined associations between resilience with sociodemographic (eg, health literacy, adverse childhood experiences [ACEs]) and disease factors (eg, age of onset, duration, disease activity). Pearson correlations determined relationships between resilience and patient-reported depressive and anxiety symptoms, executive functioning, pain interference, and fatigue.

Results: Of 49 participants, the mean score for individual psychological resilience was 26.0 (SD 7.1; CD-RISC-10), and the mean score for socioecological resilience was 73.4 (SD 9.1; CYRM-R). Higher resilience on CD-RISC-10 (β 0.99, 95% CI 0.45-1.55, P < 0.01) and CYRM-R (β 0.84, 95% CI 0.13-1.55, P = 0.02) was associated with better health literacy on the communication subscale. Lower CYRM-R scores were associated with higher number of ACEs (β -1.02, 95% CI -1.88 to -0.17; P = 0.02). For PROMs, lower scores for both individual and socioecological resilience correlated with worse depressive symptoms (r -0.44, P = 0.003 for CD-RISC-10; r -0.55, P = 0.001 for CYRM-R) and executive functioning (r -0.49, P = 0.002 for CD-RISC-10; r -0.56, P = 0.002 for CYRM-R).

Conclusion: Greater resilience was associated with fewer ACEs and better health-related communication, patient-reported mental health, and executive functioning. Findings highlight the importance of fostering resilience to improve outcomes in youth with cSLE.

目的:本研究探讨儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮(cSLE)患者的个体和社会生态恢复力及其与社会人口学和疾病特征以及患者报告的心理社会结局的关系。方法:我们于2021年10月至2024年7月在加拿大三级中心对11-22岁的cSLE患者进行了横断面研究。康诺-戴维森弹性量表(CD-RISC 10)评估了个体的弹性。儿童和青年弹性测量-修订(CYRM-R)评估社会生态弹性。线性回归模型检验了复原力与社会人口统计学(如健康素养、不良童年经历)和疾病因素(如发病年龄、持续时间、疾病活动)之间的关联。皮尔森相关性确定了恢复力与患者报告的抑郁和焦虑症状、执行功能、疼痛干扰和疲劳之间的关系。结果:49名被试个体心理弹性的cd - risc10平均得分为26.0 (SD=7.1),社会生态弹性的CYRM-R平均得分为73.4 (SD=9.1)。CD-RISC 10的高弹性(b=0.99, 95%CI[0.45至1.55]),结论:更大的弹性与更少的ace、更好的健康相关沟通、患者报告的心理健康和执行功能相关。研究结果强调了培养适应力对改善青少年儿童期学习障碍患者预后的重要性。
{"title":"Individual and Socioecological Resilience in Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Associations With Patient Characteristics and Psychosocial Patient-Reported Outcomes.","authors":"Isabella Zaffino, Louise Boulard, Joanna Law, Ashley Danguecan, Asha Jeyanathan, Lawrence Ng, Sandra Williams-Reid, Kiah Reid, Angela Cortes, Eugene Cortes, Deborah M Levy, Linda T Hiraki, Andrea M Knight","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0375","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0375","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates individual and socioecological resilience and its relationship with sociodemographic and disease characteristics, as well as psychosocial patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with cSLE, ages 11-22 years, at a Canadian tertiary center from October 2021 to July 2024. The 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) assessed individual resilience. The Child and Youth Resilience Measure-Revised (CYRM-R) assessed socioecological resilience. Linear regression models examined associations between resilience with sociodemographic (eg, health literacy, adverse childhood experiences [ACEs]) and disease factors (eg, age of onset, duration, disease activity). Pearson correlations determined relationships between resilience and patient-reported depressive and anxiety symptoms, executive functioning, pain interference, and fatigue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 49 participants, the mean score for individual psychological resilience was 26.0 (SD 7.1; CD-RISC-10), and the mean score for socioecological resilience was 73.4 (SD 9.1; CYRM-R). Higher resilience on CD-RISC-10 (β 0.99, 95% CI 0.45-1.55, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and CYRM-R (β 0.84, 95% CI 0.13-1.55, <i>P</i> = 0.02) was associated with better health literacy on the communication subscale. Lower CYRM-R scores were associated with higher number of ACEs (β -1.02, 95% CI -1.88 to -0.17; <i>P</i> = 0.02). For PROMs, lower scores for both individual and socioecological resilience correlated with worse depressive symptoms (<i>r</i> -0.44, <i>P</i> = 0.003 for CD-RISC-10; <i>r</i> -0.55, <i>P</i> = 0.001 for CYRM-R) and executive functioning (<i>r</i> -0.49, <i>P</i> = 0.002 for CD-RISC-10; <i>r</i> -0.56, <i>P</i> = 0.002 for CYRM-R).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater resilience was associated with fewer ACEs and better health-related communication, patient-reported mental health, and executive functioning. Findings highlight the importance of fostering resilience to improve outcomes in youth with cSLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"297-306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144977024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factor Analysis to Determine Subgroups of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Systemic Sclerosis. 确定系统性硬化症胃肠道症状亚组的因素分析。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-0982
Laura Ross, Dylan Hansen, Susanna Proudman, Jennifer Walker, Wendy Stevens, Nava Ferdowsi, Joanne Sahhar, Gene-Siew Ngian, Diane Apostolopoulos, Lauren V Host, Mandana Nikpour, Chamara Basnayake, Elizabeth R Volkmann

Objective: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) gastrointestinal (GI) disease is heterogeneous in presentation, with individual symptoms lacking specificity for specific anatomical and functional abnormalities. We used factor analysis to investigate whether latent subgroups of SSc-GI symptoms can be detected.

Methods: Using the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal 2.0 (GIT 2.0) questionnaire data from 773 Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study participants, we performed a factor analysis of, firstly, GIT 2.0 domains scores, and then individual GIT 2.0 question responses to identify latent factors. A subsequent cluster analysis was performed to explore whether clinically definable SSc phenotypes were associated with specific GI symptoms.

Results: SSc-GI symptoms were highly correlated. Factor analysis of individual GIT 2.0 question responses revealed 4 latent factors within the dataset that could be clinically described as upper GI tract symptoms, bloating, diarrhea and incontinence, and constipation. Cluster analysis revealed 2 patient clusters, distinguished by disease duration and severity of GI manifestations. Anticentromere antibodies and pulmonary arterial hypertension were more common in participants with severe GI disease.

Conclusion: Despite the high correlation between GI manifestations, it is possible to detect subgroups of SSc-GI symptoms. Improved understanding of these subgroups of SSc-GI disease may advance the discovery of targeted interventions to improve the daily function and quality of life of those living with SSc.

目的:系统性硬化症(SSc)胃肠道疾病的表现是异质性的,个体症状缺乏特异性的特定解剖和功能异常。我们使用因子分析来调查是否可以检测到SSc胃肠道症状的潜在亚群。方法:利用来自773名澳大利亚硬皮病队列研究参与者的SCTC UCLA胃肠2.0问卷(GIT 2.0)数据,首先对GIT 2.0域得分进行因子分析,然后对个人GIT 2.0问题的回答进行因子分析,以识别潜在因素。随后进行聚类分析,以探讨临床可定义的SSc表型是否与特定胃肠道症状相关。结果:SSc胃肠道症状高度相关。对单个GIT 2.0问题回答的因素分析显示,数据集中有四个潜在因素,可在临床上描述为上胃肠道症状、腹胀、腹泻和大小便失禁以及便秘。聚类分析显示两组患者,以病程和胃肠道表现的严重程度来区分。抗着丝粒抗体和肺动脉高压在患有严重胃肠道疾病的参与者中更为常见。结论:尽管胃肠道表现之间存在高度相关性,但仍有可能检测出SSc胃肠道症状的亚群。进一步了解SSc胃肠道疾病的这些亚群,可能会促进发现有针对性的干预措施,以改善SSc患者的日常功能和生活质量。
{"title":"Factor Analysis to Determine Subgroups of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Systemic Sclerosis.","authors":"Laura Ross, Dylan Hansen, Susanna Proudman, Jennifer Walker, Wendy Stevens, Nava Ferdowsi, Joanne Sahhar, Gene-Siew Ngian, Diane Apostolopoulos, Lauren V Host, Mandana Nikpour, Chamara Basnayake, Elizabeth R Volkmann","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0982","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0982","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Systemic sclerosis (SSc) gastrointestinal (GI) disease is heterogeneous in presentation, with individual symptoms lacking specificity for specific anatomical and functional abnormalities. We used factor analysis to investigate whether latent subgroups of SSc-GI symptoms can be detected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal 2.0 (GIT 2.0) questionnaire data from 773 Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study participants, we performed a factor analysis of, firstly, GIT 2.0 domains scores, and then individual GIT 2.0 question responses to identify latent factors. A subsequent cluster analysis was performed to explore whether clinically definable SSc phenotypes were associated with specific GI symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SSc-GI symptoms were highly correlated. Factor analysis of individual GIT 2.0 question responses revealed 4 latent factors within the dataset that could be clinically described as upper GI tract symptoms, bloating, diarrhea and incontinence, and constipation. Cluster analysis revealed 2 patient clusters, distinguished by disease duration and severity of GI manifestations. Anticentromere antibodies and pulmonary arterial hypertension were more common in participants with severe GI disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the high correlation between GI manifestations, it is possible to detect subgroups of SSc-GI symptoms. Improved understanding of these subgroups of SSc-GI disease may advance the discovery of targeted interventions to improve the daily function and quality of life of those living with SSc.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Choice of Biologic Immunotherapy for Psoriasis or Psoriatic Arthritis and Its Association With Risk of Major Adverse Cardiac Events. 银屑病或银屑病关节炎的生物免疫治疗选择与主要不良心脏事件的风险无关。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-0446
Jack Geiger, Bonit Gill, Jean Liew, Michael Putman, Shikha Singla

Objective: Individuals with psoriasis (PsO) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have an elevated risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which include congestive heart failure (CHF), myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) may reduce cardiovascular risk; however, whether MACE risk differs by bDMARD class for this population is unknown.

Methods: Using data from TriNetX database, we identified patients with PsO/PsA who were new bDMARD users, including tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitors (-i), IL-23i, or IL-12/23i. Time-dependent risk for MACE was calculated using weighted multinomial Cox proportional hazards regression with TNFi exposure as the referent. Additional analyses evaluated components of the primary outcome and baseline cardiovascular disease. A negative control outcome was used to assess bias.

Results: We identified 32,758 patients with PsO/PsA who were new bDMARD users. Patients had PsO/PsA for a mean of 3.5 (SD 4.5) years prior to starting a biologic, the most common being TNFi (62.9%), followed by IL-17i (15.4%), IL-23i (11%), and IL-12/23i (10.7%). In weighted multinomial Cox proportional hazards regression, the adjusted risk of MACE was similar for IL-17Ai (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-1.32), IL-23i (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54-1.31), and IL-12/23i (aHR 1.08, 95% CI 0.80-1.47) as compared to TNFi. Subset analyses supported the primary analysis. Negative control outcomes suggested adequate control of bias confounding.

Conclusion: MACE risk does not significantly differ across bDMARD classes in patients with PsO/PsA. Therefore, cardiovascular risk should not guide biologic selection in this population.

目的:银屑病或银屑病关节炎(PsO/PsA)患者发生主要心脏不良事件(MACE)的风险较高,包括充血性心力衰竭(CHF)、心肌梗死(MI)和脑血管意外(CVA)。生物疾病修饰抗风湿药物(bDMARD)可能降低心血管风险,然而,对于该人群,MACE风险是否因bDMARD类别而异尚不清楚。方法:使用TriNetX数据库的数据,我们确定了新的bDMARD使用者的PsO/PsA患者,包括肿瘤坏死因子α抑制剂(TNFi),白细胞介素- 17a抑制剂(IL17i),白细胞介素-23抑制剂(IL-23i)或白细胞介素-12/23抑制剂(IL-12/23i)。以TNF暴露为参照,使用加权多项Cox比例风险回归计算MACE的时间依赖性风险。其他分析评估了主要结局和基线心血管疾病的组成部分。采用阴性对照结果评估偏倚。结果:我们确定了32,758例新使用bDMARD的PsO/PsA患者。在开始使用生物制剂之前,患者的PsO/PsA平均为3.5年(SD 4.5),最常见的是TNFi(62.9%),其次是IL-17i (15.4%), IL-23i(10.7%)和IL12/23i(10.7%)。在加权多项Cox比例风险回归中,与TNFi相比,IL-17A抑制剂(aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-1.32)、IL-23抑制剂(aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54-1.31)和IL-12/23抑制剂(aHR 1.08, 95% CI 0.80-1.47)的MACE调整风险相似。子集分析支持主要分析。阴性对照结果表明对混杂偏倚控制充分。结论:不同bDMARD类型的PsO/PsA患者MACE风险无显著差异。因此,在这一人群中,心血管风险不应作为生物选择的指导。
{"title":"Choice of Biologic Immunotherapy for Psoriasis or Psoriatic Arthritis and Its Association With Risk of Major Adverse Cardiac Events.","authors":"Jack Geiger, Bonit Gill, Jean Liew, Michael Putman, Shikha Singla","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0446","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0446","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Individuals with psoriasis (PsO) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have an elevated risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which include congestive heart failure (CHF), myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) may reduce cardiovascular risk; however, whether MACE risk differs by bDMARD class for this population is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from TriNetX database, we identified patients with PsO/PsA who were new bDMARD users, including tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitors (-i), IL-23i, or IL-12/23i. Time-dependent risk for MACE was calculated using weighted multinomial Cox proportional hazards regression with TNFi exposure as the referent. Additional analyses evaluated components of the primary outcome and baseline cardiovascular disease. A negative control outcome was used to assess bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 32,758 patients with PsO/PsA who were new bDMARD users. Patients had PsO/PsA for a mean of 3.5 (SD 4.5) years prior to starting a biologic, the most common being TNFi (62.9%), followed by IL-17i (15.4%), IL-23i (11%), and IL-12/23i (10.7%). In weighted multinomial Cox proportional hazards regression, the adjusted risk of MACE was similar for IL-17Ai (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-1.32), IL-23i (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54-1.31), and IL-12/23i (aHR 1.08, 95% CI 0.80-1.47) as compared to TNFi. Subset analyses supported the primary analysis. Negative control outcomes suggested adequate control of bias confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MACE risk does not significantly differ across bDMARD classes in patients with PsO/PsA. Therefore, cardiovascular risk should not guide biologic selection in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"277-282"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145208473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Why Are We Here? Thoughts From a Life in Medicine. 我们为什么在这里?医学生涯的思考。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-1137
Richard S Panush, Etan A Panush Grant, Lia H Panush Grant
{"title":"Why Are We Here? Thoughts From a Life in Medicine.","authors":"Richard S Panush, Etan A Panush Grant, Lia H Panush Grant","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-1137","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-1137","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"338-339"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When You Walk Through a Storm: Stress, Resilience, and Coping in Rheumatology. 当你走过暴风雨:风湿病学中的压力、恢复力和应对。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-1280
Kimberly DeQuattro
{"title":"When You Walk Through a Storm: Stress, Resilience, and Coping in Rheumatology.","authors":"Kimberly DeQuattro","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-1280","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-1280","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"240-242"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk of Spondyloarthritis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Treatment With Biologics or Janus Kinase Inhibitors. 生物制剂或Janus激酶抑制剂治疗炎症性肠病患者脊柱关节炎的风险
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-1279
Young-Eun Kim, Soo Min Ahn, Ji Seon Oh, Yong-Gil Kim, Chang-Keun Lee, Bin Yoo, Sung Wook Hwang, Byong Duk Ye, Suk-Kyun Yang, Sang Hyoung Park, Seokchan Hong

Objective: To detect spondyloarthritis (SpA) and evaluate risk factors in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) during biologic or Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) treatment.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with IBD receiving biologics or JAKi, excluding prior SpA cases. We identified patients who developed musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms during IBD treatment. SpA was diagnosed after a clinical evaluation by a rheumatologist alongside imaging analysis of conventional radiographs and HLA-B27 determination. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints was performed only in cases where the conventional radiograph was inconclusive.

Results: Of 1649 patients with IBD receiving biologic or JAKi treatment (Crohn disease: 1335; ulcerative colitis [UC]: 314), 96 (5.8%) were excluded due to a prior SpA diagnosis. Among the remaining 1553 patients, 106 (6.8%) developed MSK symptoms during IBD treatment, and 30 (1.9%) were diagnosed with SpA (axial: 20; peripheral: 10) during the follow-up (median 5.2 [IQR 3.4-7.5] years). Risk factors for SpA in these patients included a partial Mayo score for UC at the time of onset of MSK symptoms (hazard ratio [HR] 1.57; P = 0.03) and HLA-B27 positivity (HR 3.70; P = 0.004). As well as IBD treatment, 23/30 (77%) patients with SpA used nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). IBD disease activity did not worsen during treatment, regardless of NSAID use.

Conclusion: During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 6.8% of patients with IBD undergoing biologic or JAKi treatment developed MSK symptoms, with one-third subsequently diagnosed with SpA. HLA-B27 positivity and higher UC disease activity were associated with an increased risk of SpA.

目的:探讨生物或Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)治疗期间炎症性肠病(IBD)患者颈椎病(SpA)的检测及危险因素。方法:回顾性队列研究IBD患者的生物制剂或JAKis,排除既往的SpA病例。我们确定了在IBD治疗期间出现肌肉骨骼症状的患者。在风湿病学家的临床评估以及常规x线片成像分析和人白细胞抗原B27 (HLA-B27)测定后诊断为SpA。骶髂关节的磁共振成像仅在CR不确定的情况下进行。结果:1649例IBD患者接受生物或JAKi治疗(克罗恩病:1335例;溃疡性结肠炎[UC]: 314), 96例(5.8%)因既往SpA诊断而被排除。在其余1553例患者中,106例(6.8%)在IBD治疗期间出现肌肉骨骼症状,30例(1.9%)在随访期间被诊断为SpA(20例:轴向,10例:外周)(中位数:5.2[3.4-7.5]年)。这些患者发生SpA的危险因素包括出现肌肉骨骼症状时UC的部分Mayo评分(HR 1.57, P=0.03)和HLA-B27阳性(HR 3.70, P=0.004)。在IBD治疗的同时,23/30 (77%)SpA患者使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs);无论是否使用非甾体抗炎药,IBD疾病活动在治疗期间均未恶化。结论:在中位随访5.2年期间,接受生物或JAKi治疗的IBD患者中有6.8%出现肌肉骨骼症状,其中三分之一随后被诊断为SpA。HLA-B27阳性和较高的UC疾病活动性与SpA风险增加相关。
{"title":"Risk of Spondyloarthritis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Treatment With Biologics or Janus Kinase Inhibitors.","authors":"Young-Eun Kim, Soo Min Ahn, Ji Seon Oh, Yong-Gil Kim, Chang-Keun Lee, Bin Yoo, Sung Wook Hwang, Byong Duk Ye, Suk-Kyun Yang, Sang Hyoung Park, Seokchan Hong","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1279","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1279","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To detect spondyloarthritis (SpA) and evaluate risk factors in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) during biologic or Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with IBD receiving biologics or JAKi, excluding prior SpA cases. We identified patients who developed musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms during IBD treatment. SpA was diagnosed after a clinical evaluation by a rheumatologist alongside imaging analysis of conventional radiographs and HLA-B27 determination. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints was performed only in cases where the conventional radiograph was inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1649 patients with IBD receiving biologic or JAKi treatment (Crohn disease: 1335; ulcerative colitis [UC]: 314), 96 (5.8%) were excluded due to a prior SpA diagnosis. Among the remaining 1553 patients, 106 (6.8%) developed MSK symptoms during IBD treatment, and 30 (1.9%) were diagnosed with SpA (axial: 20; peripheral: 10) during the follow-up (median 5.2 [IQR 3.4-7.5] years). Risk factors for SpA in these patients included a partial Mayo score for UC at the time of onset of MSK symptoms (hazard ratio [HR] 1.57; <i>P</i> = 0.03) and HLA-B27 positivity (HR 3.70; <i>P</i> = 0.004). As well as IBD treatment, 23/30 (77%) patients with SpA used nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). IBD disease activity did not worsen during treatment, regardless of NSAID use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 6.8% of patients with IBD undergoing biologic or JAKi treatment developed MSK symptoms, with one-third subsequently diagnosed with SpA. HLA-B27 positivity and higher UC disease activity were associated with an increased risk of SpA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"260-270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144719007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dr. Murakami et al reply. 村上博士等人回复。
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-0959
Keita Murakami, Junya Arai, Sozaburo Ihara, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
{"title":"Dr. Murakami et al reply.","authors":"Keita Murakami, Junya Arai, Sozaburo Ihara, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0959","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0959","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"350"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145426547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectivity and Safety of Febuxostat in Reducing Serum Urate in Gout Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Multicenter ULTRA Registry Study. 非布司他有效且安全地降低痛风慢性肾病患者血清尿酸:一项前瞻性多中心ULTRA注册研究
IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-0881
Yoon-Jeong Oh, Hyo Jin Choi, Sang-Hyon Kim, You-Jung Ha, In Ah Choi, Min Jung Kim, Kichul Shin, Hyun-Ok Kim, Sung Won Lee, Joong Kyong Ahn, Chang Hoon Lee, Se Hee Kim, Kyeong Min Son, Ki Won Moon, Chang-Nam Son

Objective: Gout, an inflammatory arthritis caused by hyperuricemia, is highly prevalent with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We evaluated longitudinal changes in serum urate (SU) levels and febuxostat dosage according to renal function.

Methods: Among 405 patients in the Urate-Lowering Therapy in Gout (ULTRA) registry between November 2021 and December 2023, 112 were analyzed after excluding those with < 1-year follow-up period, nonfebuxostat therapy, or missing data. SU levels and febuxostat doses were compared between the 2 groups at baseline, 6, and 12 months.

Results: Baseline SU levels did not differ between the normal and CKD groups. After febuxostat therapy, mean (SD) SU levels were significantly lower in the CKD group than in the normal group (at 6 months: 4.45 [1.84] mg/dL vs 5.62 [1.62] mg/dL, P = 0.001; at 12 months: 4.81 [1.81] mg/dL vs 5.60 [1.94] mg/dL, P = 0.04). Meanwhile, the mean dosages of febuxostat were lower in CKD group than in the normal group (at 6 months: 40.61 [22.07] mg vs 47.54 [19.43] mg, P = 0.11; at 12 months: 40.59 [21.73] mg vs 48.49 [19.70] mg, P = 0.06), although these differences were not statistically significant. Additionally, the proportion of patients achieving SU < 6 mg/dL at 6 months was higher in the CKD group than in the normal group (91.2% vs 68.6%, P = 0.01).

Conclusion: An individualized dosing strategy based on SU response, rather than renal function alone, may optimize treatment outcomes in these patients.

目的:痛风是一种由高尿酸血症引起的炎症性关节炎,在慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)中非常普遍。我们根据肾功能评估血清尿酸(SU)水平和非布司他剂量的纵向变化。方法:在2021年11月至2023年12月期间,在降低尿酸治疗(ULTRA)注册的405例患者中,排除了基线SU水平在正常组和CKD组之间没有差异的患者后,对112例患者进行了分析。非布司他治疗后,CKD组SU水平明显低于正常组(6个月时:4.45±1.84 mg/dL vs. 5.62±1.62 mg/dL, p = 0.001; 12个月时:4.81±1.81 mg/dL vs. 5.60±1.94 mg/dL, p = 0.041)。同时,CKD组非布司他的平均剂量低于正常组(6个月时:40.61±22.07 mg∶47.54±19.43 mg, p = 0.110; 12个月时:40.59±21.73 mg∶48.49±19.70 mg, p = 0.064),但差异无统计学意义。结论:因此,基于SU反应的个体化给药策略,而不仅仅是肾功能,可能会优化这些患者的治疗结果。
{"title":"Effectivity and Safety of Febuxostat in Reducing Serum Urate in Gout Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Multicenter ULTRA Registry Study.","authors":"Yoon-Jeong Oh, Hyo Jin Choi, Sang-Hyon Kim, You-Jung Ha, In Ah Choi, Min Jung Kim, Kichul Shin, Hyun-Ok Kim, Sung Won Lee, Joong Kyong Ahn, Chang Hoon Lee, Se Hee Kim, Kyeong Min Son, Ki Won Moon, Chang-Nam Son","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0881","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0881","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gout, an inflammatory arthritis caused by hyperuricemia, is highly prevalent with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We evaluated longitudinal changes in serum urate (SU) levels and febuxostat dosage according to renal function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 405 patients in the Urate-Lowering Therapy in Gout (ULTRA) registry between November 2021 and December 2023, 112 were analyzed after excluding those with < 1-year follow-up period, nonfebuxostat therapy, or missing data. SU levels and febuxostat doses were compared between the 2 groups at baseline, 6, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline SU levels did not differ between the normal and CKD groups. After febuxostat therapy, mean (SD) SU levels were significantly lower in the CKD group than in the normal group (at 6 months: 4.45 [1.84] mg/dL vs 5.62 [1.62] mg/dL, <i>P</i> = 0.001; at 12 months: 4.81 [1.81] mg/dL vs 5.60 [1.94] mg/dL, <i>P</i> = 0.04). Meanwhile, the mean dosages of febuxostat were lower in CKD group than in the normal group (at 6 months: 40.61 [22.07] mg vs 47.54 [19.43] mg, <i>P</i> = 0.11; at 12 months: 40.59 [21.73] mg vs 48.49 [19.70] mg, <i>P</i> = 0.06), although these differences were not statistically significant. Additionally, the proportion of patients achieving SU < 6 mg/dL at 6 months was higher in the CKD group than in the normal group (91.2% vs 68.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An individualized dosing strategy based on SU response, rather than renal function alone, may optimize treatment outcomes in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"322-328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Rheumatology
全部 Geobiology Appl. Clay Sci. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta J. Hydrol. Org. Geochem. Carbon Balance Manage. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. Int. J. Biometeorol. IZV-PHYS SOLID EART+ J. Atmos. Chem. Acta Oceanolog. Sin. Acta Geophys. ACTA GEOL POL ACTA PETROL SIN ACTA GEOL SIN-ENGL AAPG Bull. Acta Geochimica Adv. Atmos. Sci. Adv. Meteorol. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Am. J. Sci. Am. Mineral. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. Appl. Geochem. Aquat. Geochem. Ann. Glaciol. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. ARCHAEOMETRY ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. ATMOSPHERE-BASEL Atmos. Res. Aust. J. Earth Sci. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Basin Res. Big Earth Data BIOGEOSCIENCES Geostand. Geoanal. Res. GEOLOGY Geosci. J. Geochem. J. Geochem. Trans. Geosci. Front. Geol. Ore Deposits Global Biogeochem. Cycles Gondwana Res. Geochem. Int. Geol. J. Geophys. Prospect. Geosci. Model Dev. GEOL BELG GROUNDWATER Hydrogeol. J. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Hydrol. Processes Int. J. Climatol. Int. J. Earth Sci. Int. Geol. Rev. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. Int. J. Geomech. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. Isl. Arc J. Afr. Earth. Sci. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. J APPL METEOROL CLIM J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. J. Clim. J. Earth Sci. J. Earth Syst. Sci. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. J. Geog. Sci. Mineral. Mag. Miner. Deposita Mon. Weather Rev. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Nat. Clim. Change Nat. Geosci. Ocean Dyn. Ocean and Coastal Research npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. Ocean Modell. Ocean Sci. Ore Geol. Rev. OCEAN SCI J Paleontol. J. PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL PERIOD MINERAL PETROLOGY+ Phys. Chem. Miner. Polar Sci. Prog. Oceanogr. Quat. Sci. Rev. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. RADIOCARBON Pure Appl. Geophys. Resour. Geol. Rev. Geophys. Sediment. Geol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1