Pub Date : 2026-03-15DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-1069
Yining Lu, Daphna Harel, Klint Kanopka, Marie-Eve Carrier, Linda Kwakkenbos, Susan J Bartlett, Catherine Fortuné, Amy Gietzen, Geneviève Guillot, Amanda Lawrie-Jones, Vanessa L Malcarne, Maureen D Mayes, Michelle Richard, Maureen Sauvé, James Stempel, Luc Mouthon, Andrea Benedetti, Brett D Thombs
Objective: To compare 5 Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scoring methods to measure functional disability among people with systemic sclerosis (SSc).
Methods: Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort participants completed the HAQ (20 items, 8 domains) at enrollment. We calculated (1) HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores, which sum the highest item score for each domain and account for the use of aids, devices, or assistance; (2) HAQ-Alternative Disability Index (HAQ-ADI) scores, which are calculated similarly but do not account for aids, devices, or assistance; and (3) modified HAQ (mHAQ) scores, which are based on 1 administered item from each domain, as well as a simple summed score of all 20 items. We then compared these scores and those generated from an item response tree (IRTree) on convergent validity with physical function, pain interference, and hand function using Pearson correlations.
Results: IRTree-based scores were highly correlated (r 0.90-0.95) with other scoring procedures and showed moderate-to-strong correlations with all external measures (r 0.68-0.80). There was no evidence of a difference between IRTree-based and HAQ-DI correlations with external measures. IRTree-based scores performed better than HAQ-ADI, mHAQ, and summed scores for physical function and pain interference but worse for hand function.
Conclusion: IRTree-based scoring is a novel approach that incorporates information from all HAQ items and whether participants use aids, devices, or assistance. Its association with external measures, however, did not differ from the standard HAQ-DI. HAQ-DI scoring is easy to implement, and extensive comparative data are available, making it the preferred scoring method.
{"title":"Comparing Novel and Legacy Health Assessment Questionnaire Scoring Methods: A Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort Study.","authors":"Yining Lu, Daphna Harel, Klint Kanopka, Marie-Eve Carrier, Linda Kwakkenbos, Susan J Bartlett, Catherine Fortuné, Amy Gietzen, Geneviève Guillot, Amanda Lawrie-Jones, Vanessa L Malcarne, Maureen D Mayes, Michelle Richard, Maureen Sauvé, James Stempel, Luc Mouthon, Andrea Benedetti, Brett D Thombs","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-1069","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-1069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare 5 Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scoring methods to measure functional disability among people with systemic sclerosis (SSc).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort participants completed the HAQ (20 items, 8 domains) at enrollment. We calculated (1) HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores, which sum the highest item score for each domain and account for the use of aids, devices, or assistance; (2) HAQ-Alternative Disability Index (HAQ-ADI) scores, which are calculated similarly but do not account for aids, devices, or assistance; and (3) modified HAQ (mHAQ) scores, which are based on 1 administered item from each domain, as well as a simple summed score of all 20 items. We then compared these scores and those generated from an item response tree (IRTree) on convergent validity with physical function, pain interference, and hand function using Pearson correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IRTree-based scores were highly correlated (<i>r</i> 0.90-0.95) with other scoring procedures and showed moderate-to-strong correlations with all external measures (<i>r</i> 0.68-0.80). There was no evidence of a difference between IRTree-based and HAQ-DI correlations with external measures. IRTree-based scores performed better than HAQ-ADI, mHAQ, and summed scores for physical function and pain interference but worse for hand function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IRTree-based scoring is a novel approach that incorporates information from all HAQ items and whether participants use aids, devices, or assistance. Its association with external measures, however, did not differ from the standard HAQ-DI. HAQ-DI scoring is easy to implement, and extensive comparative data are available, making it the preferred scoring method.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-0757
Sarah Aly, Gilda Parastandehchehr, Sasha Bernatsky, Évelyne Vinet, Laurent Arnaud, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau, Paul R Fortin, John A Reynolds, J Carter Thorne, Zahi Touma, Daniel Wallace, Victoria P Werth, Wendy Singer, Arielle Mendel
Objective: Experiences with the antimalarial quinacrine for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) remain underexplored. We evaluated and compared dermatologists' and rheumatologists' experiences with quinacrine in managing SLE and/or CLE.
Methods: We sent a structured survey to 102 SLE specialists within the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) and the Canadian Network for Improved Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (CaNIOS), and 200 members of the Rheumatologic Dermatology Society (RDS). Participants responded to questions on self-reported quinacrine prescription history, perceived clinical benefit, reasons for drug discontinuation, and barriers to prescribing.
Results: A total of 20 dermatologists from RDS and 40 SLICC and CaNIOS members responded to the survey. All RDS participants (100%) had previously prescribed quinacrine, compared to 17/40 (43%) of SLICC/CaNIOS participants. The majority of quinacrine prescribers (100% RDS, 12/17 [71%] SLICC/CaNIOS) had prescribed quinacrine in combination with another antimalarial. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or chloroquine (CQ) intolerance (65% RDS, 47% SLICC/CaNIOS) and HCQ/CQ-related retinal toxicity (50% RDS, 24% SLICC/CaNIOS) were other reasons for prescribing quinacrine. Clinical benefit was reported by 19/20 (95%) of RDS and 12/17 (71%) of SLICC/CaNIOS clinicians, and discontinuations were less frequent among RDS (5/20 [25%] reported none) compared to SLICC/CaNIOS (all 17 reported ≥ 1). Availability and cost of quinacrine were primary prescribing barriers.
Conclusion: Surveyed dermatologists and rheumatologists differed in their experience with quinacrine for CLE and SLE, respectively. Availability remains a key barrier to prescribing, underscoring the need to address supply issues and conduct further research to optimize quinacrine use in SLE and CLE.
{"title":"A Global Survey of Quinacrine Use in Systemic and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.","authors":"Sarah Aly, Gilda Parastandehchehr, Sasha Bernatsky, Évelyne Vinet, Laurent Arnaud, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau, Paul R Fortin, John A Reynolds, J Carter Thorne, Zahi Touma, Daniel Wallace, Victoria P Werth, Wendy Singer, Arielle Mendel","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0757","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0757","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Experiences with the antimalarial quinacrine for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) remain underexplored. We evaluated and compared dermatologists' and rheumatologists' experiences with quinacrine in managing SLE and/or CLE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We sent a structured survey to 102 SLE specialists within the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) and the Canadian Network for Improved Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (CaNIOS), and 200 members of the Rheumatologic Dermatology Society (RDS). Participants responded to questions on self-reported quinacrine prescription history, perceived clinical benefit, reasons for drug discontinuation, and barriers to prescribing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 dermatologists from RDS and 40 SLICC and CaNIOS members responded to the survey. All RDS participants (100%) had previously prescribed quinacrine, compared to 17/40 (43%) of SLICC/CaNIOS participants. The majority of quinacrine prescribers (100% RDS, 12/17 [71%] SLICC/CaNIOS) had prescribed quinacrine in combination with another antimalarial. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or chloroquine (CQ) intolerance (65% RDS, 47% SLICC/CaNIOS) and HCQ/CQ-related retinal toxicity (50% RDS, 24% SLICC/CaNIOS) were other reasons for prescribing quinacrine. Clinical benefit was reported by 19/20 (95%) of RDS and 12/17 (71%) of SLICC/CaNIOS clinicians, and discontinuations were less frequent among RDS (5/20 [25%] reported none) compared to SLICC/CaNIOS (all 17 reported ≥ 1). Availability and cost of quinacrine were primary prescribing barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surveyed dermatologists and rheumatologists differed in their experience with quinacrine for CLE and SLE, respectively. Availability remains a key barrier to prescribing, underscoring the need to address supply issues and conduct further research to optimize quinacrine use in SLE and CLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"292-296"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-0375
Isabella Zaffino, Louise Boulard, Joanna Law, Ashley Danguecan, Asha Jeyanathan, Lawrence Ng, Sandra Williams-Reid, Kiah Reid, Angela Cortes, Eugene Cortes, Deborah M Levy, Linda T Hiraki, Andrea M Knight
Objective: This study investigates individual and socioecological resilience and its relationship with sociodemographic and disease characteristics, as well as psychosocial patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE).
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with cSLE, ages 11-22 years, at a Canadian tertiary center from October 2021 to July 2024. The 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) assessed individual resilience. The Child and Youth Resilience Measure-Revised (CYRM-R) assessed socioecological resilience. Linear regression models examined associations between resilience with sociodemographic (eg, health literacy, adverse childhood experiences [ACEs]) and disease factors (eg, age of onset, duration, disease activity). Pearson correlations determined relationships between resilience and patient-reported depressive and anxiety symptoms, executive functioning, pain interference, and fatigue.
Results: Of 49 participants, the mean score for individual psychological resilience was 26.0 (SD 7.1; CD-RISC-10), and the mean score for socioecological resilience was 73.4 (SD 9.1; CYRM-R). Higher resilience on CD-RISC-10 (β 0.99, 95% CI 0.45-1.55, P < 0.01) and CYRM-R (β 0.84, 95% CI 0.13-1.55, P = 0.02) was associated with better health literacy on the communication subscale. Lower CYRM-R scores were associated with higher number of ACEs (β -1.02, 95% CI -1.88 to -0.17; P = 0.02). For PROMs, lower scores for both individual and socioecological resilience correlated with worse depressive symptoms (r -0.44, P = 0.003 for CD-RISC-10; r -0.55, P = 0.001 for CYRM-R) and executive functioning (r -0.49, P = 0.002 for CD-RISC-10; r -0.56, P = 0.002 for CYRM-R).
Conclusion: Greater resilience was associated with fewer ACEs and better health-related communication, patient-reported mental health, and executive functioning. Findings highlight the importance of fostering resilience to improve outcomes in youth with cSLE.
{"title":"Individual and Socioecological Resilience in Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Associations With Patient Characteristics and Psychosocial Patient-Reported Outcomes.","authors":"Isabella Zaffino, Louise Boulard, Joanna Law, Ashley Danguecan, Asha Jeyanathan, Lawrence Ng, Sandra Williams-Reid, Kiah Reid, Angela Cortes, Eugene Cortes, Deborah M Levy, Linda T Hiraki, Andrea M Knight","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0375","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0375","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates individual and socioecological resilience and its relationship with sociodemographic and disease characteristics, as well as psychosocial patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with cSLE, ages 11-22 years, at a Canadian tertiary center from October 2021 to July 2024. The 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) assessed individual resilience. The Child and Youth Resilience Measure-Revised (CYRM-R) assessed socioecological resilience. Linear regression models examined associations between resilience with sociodemographic (eg, health literacy, adverse childhood experiences [ACEs]) and disease factors (eg, age of onset, duration, disease activity). Pearson correlations determined relationships between resilience and patient-reported depressive and anxiety symptoms, executive functioning, pain interference, and fatigue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 49 participants, the mean score for individual psychological resilience was 26.0 (SD 7.1; CD-RISC-10), and the mean score for socioecological resilience was 73.4 (SD 9.1; CYRM-R). Higher resilience on CD-RISC-10 (β 0.99, 95% CI 0.45-1.55, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and CYRM-R (β 0.84, 95% CI 0.13-1.55, <i>P</i> = 0.02) was associated with better health literacy on the communication subscale. Lower CYRM-R scores were associated with higher number of ACEs (β -1.02, 95% CI -1.88 to -0.17; <i>P</i> = 0.02). For PROMs, lower scores for both individual and socioecological resilience correlated with worse depressive symptoms (<i>r</i> -0.44, <i>P</i> = 0.003 for CD-RISC-10; <i>r</i> -0.55, <i>P</i> = 0.001 for CYRM-R) and executive functioning (<i>r</i> -0.49, <i>P</i> = 0.002 for CD-RISC-10; <i>r</i> -0.56, <i>P</i> = 0.002 for CYRM-R).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater resilience was associated with fewer ACEs and better health-related communication, patient-reported mental health, and executive functioning. Findings highlight the importance of fostering resilience to improve outcomes in youth with cSLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"297-306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144977024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-0982
Laura Ross, Dylan Hansen, Susanna Proudman, Jennifer Walker, Wendy Stevens, Nava Ferdowsi, Joanne Sahhar, Gene-Siew Ngian, Diane Apostolopoulos, Lauren V Host, Mandana Nikpour, Chamara Basnayake, Elizabeth R Volkmann
Objective: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) gastrointestinal (GI) disease is heterogeneous in presentation, with individual symptoms lacking specificity for specific anatomical and functional abnormalities. We used factor analysis to investigate whether latent subgroups of SSc-GI symptoms can be detected.
Methods: Using the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal 2.0 (GIT 2.0) questionnaire data from 773 Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study participants, we performed a factor analysis of, firstly, GIT 2.0 domains scores, and then individual GIT 2.0 question responses to identify latent factors. A subsequent cluster analysis was performed to explore whether clinically definable SSc phenotypes were associated with specific GI symptoms.
Results: SSc-GI symptoms were highly correlated. Factor analysis of individual GIT 2.0 question responses revealed 4 latent factors within the dataset that could be clinically described as upper GI tract symptoms, bloating, diarrhea and incontinence, and constipation. Cluster analysis revealed 2 patient clusters, distinguished by disease duration and severity of GI manifestations. Anticentromere antibodies and pulmonary arterial hypertension were more common in participants with severe GI disease.
Conclusion: Despite the high correlation between GI manifestations, it is possible to detect subgroups of SSc-GI symptoms. Improved understanding of these subgroups of SSc-GI disease may advance the discovery of targeted interventions to improve the daily function and quality of life of those living with SSc.
{"title":"Factor Analysis to Determine Subgroups of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Systemic Sclerosis.","authors":"Laura Ross, Dylan Hansen, Susanna Proudman, Jennifer Walker, Wendy Stevens, Nava Ferdowsi, Joanne Sahhar, Gene-Siew Ngian, Diane Apostolopoulos, Lauren V Host, Mandana Nikpour, Chamara Basnayake, Elizabeth R Volkmann","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0982","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0982","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Systemic sclerosis (SSc) gastrointestinal (GI) disease is heterogeneous in presentation, with individual symptoms lacking specificity for specific anatomical and functional abnormalities. We used factor analysis to investigate whether latent subgroups of SSc-GI symptoms can be detected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal 2.0 (GIT 2.0) questionnaire data from 773 Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study participants, we performed a factor analysis of, firstly, GIT 2.0 domains scores, and then individual GIT 2.0 question responses to identify latent factors. A subsequent cluster analysis was performed to explore whether clinically definable SSc phenotypes were associated with specific GI symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SSc-GI symptoms were highly correlated. Factor analysis of individual GIT 2.0 question responses revealed 4 latent factors within the dataset that could be clinically described as upper GI tract symptoms, bloating, diarrhea and incontinence, and constipation. Cluster analysis revealed 2 patient clusters, distinguished by disease duration and severity of GI manifestations. Anticentromere antibodies and pulmonary arterial hypertension were more common in participants with severe GI disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the high correlation between GI manifestations, it is possible to detect subgroups of SSc-GI symptoms. Improved understanding of these subgroups of SSc-GI disease may advance the discovery of targeted interventions to improve the daily function and quality of life of those living with SSc.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-0446
Jack Geiger, Bonit Gill, Jean Liew, Michael Putman, Shikha Singla
Objective: Individuals with psoriasis (PsO) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have an elevated risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which include congestive heart failure (CHF), myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) may reduce cardiovascular risk; however, whether MACE risk differs by bDMARD class for this population is unknown.
Methods: Using data from TriNetX database, we identified patients with PsO/PsA who were new bDMARD users, including tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitors (-i), IL-23i, or IL-12/23i. Time-dependent risk for MACE was calculated using weighted multinomial Cox proportional hazards regression with TNFi exposure as the referent. Additional analyses evaluated components of the primary outcome and baseline cardiovascular disease. A negative control outcome was used to assess bias.
Results: We identified 32,758 patients with PsO/PsA who were new bDMARD users. Patients had PsO/PsA for a mean of 3.5 (SD 4.5) years prior to starting a biologic, the most common being TNFi (62.9%), followed by IL-17i (15.4%), IL-23i (11%), and IL-12/23i (10.7%). In weighted multinomial Cox proportional hazards regression, the adjusted risk of MACE was similar for IL-17Ai (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-1.32), IL-23i (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54-1.31), and IL-12/23i (aHR 1.08, 95% CI 0.80-1.47) as compared to TNFi. Subset analyses supported the primary analysis. Negative control outcomes suggested adequate control of bias confounding.
Conclusion: MACE risk does not significantly differ across bDMARD classes in patients with PsO/PsA. Therefore, cardiovascular risk should not guide biologic selection in this population.
目的:银屑病或银屑病关节炎(PsO/PsA)患者发生主要心脏不良事件(MACE)的风险较高,包括充血性心力衰竭(CHF)、心肌梗死(MI)和脑血管意外(CVA)。生物疾病修饰抗风湿药物(bDMARD)可能降低心血管风险,然而,对于该人群,MACE风险是否因bDMARD类别而异尚不清楚。方法:使用TriNetX数据库的数据,我们确定了新的bDMARD使用者的PsO/PsA患者,包括肿瘤坏死因子α抑制剂(TNFi),白细胞介素- 17a抑制剂(IL17i),白细胞介素-23抑制剂(IL-23i)或白细胞介素-12/23抑制剂(IL-12/23i)。以TNF暴露为参照,使用加权多项Cox比例风险回归计算MACE的时间依赖性风险。其他分析评估了主要结局和基线心血管疾病的组成部分。采用阴性对照结果评估偏倚。结果:我们确定了32,758例新使用bDMARD的PsO/PsA患者。在开始使用生物制剂之前,患者的PsO/PsA平均为3.5年(SD 4.5),最常见的是TNFi(62.9%),其次是IL-17i (15.4%), IL-23i(10.7%)和IL12/23i(10.7%)。在加权多项Cox比例风险回归中,与TNFi相比,IL-17A抑制剂(aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-1.32)、IL-23抑制剂(aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54-1.31)和IL-12/23抑制剂(aHR 1.08, 95% CI 0.80-1.47)的MACE调整风险相似。子集分析支持主要分析。阴性对照结果表明对混杂偏倚控制充分。结论:不同bDMARD类型的PsO/PsA患者MACE风险无显著差异。因此,在这一人群中,心血管风险不应作为生物选择的指导。
{"title":"Choice of Biologic Immunotherapy for Psoriasis or Psoriatic Arthritis and Its Association With Risk of Major Adverse Cardiac Events.","authors":"Jack Geiger, Bonit Gill, Jean Liew, Michael Putman, Shikha Singla","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0446","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0446","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Individuals with psoriasis (PsO) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have an elevated risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which include congestive heart failure (CHF), myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) may reduce cardiovascular risk; however, whether MACE risk differs by bDMARD class for this population is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from TriNetX database, we identified patients with PsO/PsA who were new bDMARD users, including tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitors (-i), IL-23i, or IL-12/23i. Time-dependent risk for MACE was calculated using weighted multinomial Cox proportional hazards regression with TNFi exposure as the referent. Additional analyses evaluated components of the primary outcome and baseline cardiovascular disease. A negative control outcome was used to assess bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 32,758 patients with PsO/PsA who were new bDMARD users. Patients had PsO/PsA for a mean of 3.5 (SD 4.5) years prior to starting a biologic, the most common being TNFi (62.9%), followed by IL-17i (15.4%), IL-23i (11%), and IL-12/23i (10.7%). In weighted multinomial Cox proportional hazards regression, the adjusted risk of MACE was similar for IL-17Ai (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-1.32), IL-23i (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54-1.31), and IL-12/23i (aHR 1.08, 95% CI 0.80-1.47) as compared to TNFi. Subset analyses supported the primary analysis. Negative control outcomes suggested adequate control of bias confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MACE risk does not significantly differ across bDMARD classes in patients with PsO/PsA. Therefore, cardiovascular risk should not guide biologic selection in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"277-282"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145208473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-1137
Richard S Panush, Etan A Panush Grant, Lia H Panush Grant
{"title":"Why Are We Here? Thoughts From a Life in Medicine.","authors":"Richard S Panush, Etan A Panush Grant, Lia H Panush Grant","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-1137","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-1137","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"338-339"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-1280
Kimberly DeQuattro
{"title":"When You Walk Through a Storm: Stress, Resilience, and Coping in Rheumatology.","authors":"Kimberly DeQuattro","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-1280","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-1280","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"240-242"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-1279
Young-Eun Kim, Soo Min Ahn, Ji Seon Oh, Yong-Gil Kim, Chang-Keun Lee, Bin Yoo, Sung Wook Hwang, Byong Duk Ye, Suk-Kyun Yang, Sang Hyoung Park, Seokchan Hong
Objective: To detect spondyloarthritis (SpA) and evaluate risk factors in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) during biologic or Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) treatment.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with IBD receiving biologics or JAKi, excluding prior SpA cases. We identified patients who developed musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms during IBD treatment. SpA was diagnosed after a clinical evaluation by a rheumatologist alongside imaging analysis of conventional radiographs and HLA-B27 determination. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints was performed only in cases where the conventional radiograph was inconclusive.
Results: Of 1649 patients with IBD receiving biologic or JAKi treatment (Crohn disease: 1335; ulcerative colitis [UC]: 314), 96 (5.8%) were excluded due to a prior SpA diagnosis. Among the remaining 1553 patients, 106 (6.8%) developed MSK symptoms during IBD treatment, and 30 (1.9%) were diagnosed with SpA (axial: 20; peripheral: 10) during the follow-up (median 5.2 [IQR 3.4-7.5] years). Risk factors for SpA in these patients included a partial Mayo score for UC at the time of onset of MSK symptoms (hazard ratio [HR] 1.57; P = 0.03) and HLA-B27 positivity (HR 3.70; P = 0.004). As well as IBD treatment, 23/30 (77%) patients with SpA used nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). IBD disease activity did not worsen during treatment, regardless of NSAID use.
Conclusion: During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 6.8% of patients with IBD undergoing biologic or JAKi treatment developed MSK symptoms, with one-third subsequently diagnosed with SpA. HLA-B27 positivity and higher UC disease activity were associated with an increased risk of SpA.
{"title":"Risk of Spondyloarthritis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Treatment With Biologics or Janus Kinase Inhibitors.","authors":"Young-Eun Kim, Soo Min Ahn, Ji Seon Oh, Yong-Gil Kim, Chang-Keun Lee, Bin Yoo, Sung Wook Hwang, Byong Duk Ye, Suk-Kyun Yang, Sang Hyoung Park, Seokchan Hong","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1279","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1279","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To detect spondyloarthritis (SpA) and evaluate risk factors in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) during biologic or Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with IBD receiving biologics or JAKi, excluding prior SpA cases. We identified patients who developed musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms during IBD treatment. SpA was diagnosed after a clinical evaluation by a rheumatologist alongside imaging analysis of conventional radiographs and HLA-B27 determination. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints was performed only in cases where the conventional radiograph was inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1649 patients with IBD receiving biologic or JAKi treatment (Crohn disease: 1335; ulcerative colitis [UC]: 314), 96 (5.8%) were excluded due to a prior SpA diagnosis. Among the remaining 1553 patients, 106 (6.8%) developed MSK symptoms during IBD treatment, and 30 (1.9%) were diagnosed with SpA (axial: 20; peripheral: 10) during the follow-up (median 5.2 [IQR 3.4-7.5] years). Risk factors for SpA in these patients included a partial Mayo score for UC at the time of onset of MSK symptoms (hazard ratio [HR] 1.57; <i>P</i> = 0.03) and HLA-B27 positivity (HR 3.70; <i>P</i> = 0.004). As well as IBD treatment, 23/30 (77%) patients with SpA used nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). IBD disease activity did not worsen during treatment, regardless of NSAID use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 6.8% of patients with IBD undergoing biologic or JAKi treatment developed MSK symptoms, with one-third subsequently diagnosed with SpA. HLA-B27 positivity and higher UC disease activity were associated with an increased risk of SpA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"260-270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144719007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2025-0881
Yoon-Jeong Oh, Hyo Jin Choi, Sang-Hyon Kim, You-Jung Ha, In Ah Choi, Min Jung Kim, Kichul Shin, Hyun-Ok Kim, Sung Won Lee, Joong Kyong Ahn, Chang Hoon Lee, Se Hee Kim, Kyeong Min Son, Ki Won Moon, Chang-Nam Son
Objective: Gout, an inflammatory arthritis caused by hyperuricemia, is highly prevalent with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We evaluated longitudinal changes in serum urate (SU) levels and febuxostat dosage according to renal function.
Methods: Among 405 patients in the Urate-Lowering Therapy in Gout (ULTRA) registry between November 2021 and December 2023, 112 were analyzed after excluding those with < 1-year follow-up period, nonfebuxostat therapy, or missing data. SU levels and febuxostat doses were compared between the 2 groups at baseline, 6, and 12 months.
Results: Baseline SU levels did not differ between the normal and CKD groups. After febuxostat therapy, mean (SD) SU levels were significantly lower in the CKD group than in the normal group (at 6 months: 4.45 [1.84] mg/dL vs 5.62 [1.62] mg/dL, P = 0.001; at 12 months: 4.81 [1.81] mg/dL vs 5.60 [1.94] mg/dL, P = 0.04). Meanwhile, the mean dosages of febuxostat were lower in CKD group than in the normal group (at 6 months: 40.61 [22.07] mg vs 47.54 [19.43] mg, P = 0.11; at 12 months: 40.59 [21.73] mg vs 48.49 [19.70] mg, P = 0.06), although these differences were not statistically significant. Additionally, the proportion of patients achieving SU < 6 mg/dL at 6 months was higher in the CKD group than in the normal group (91.2% vs 68.6%, P = 0.01).
Conclusion: An individualized dosing strategy based on SU response, rather than renal function alone, may optimize treatment outcomes in these patients.
目的:痛风是一种由高尿酸血症引起的炎症性关节炎,在慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)中非常普遍。我们根据肾功能评估血清尿酸(SU)水平和非布司他剂量的纵向变化。方法:在2021年11月至2023年12月期间,在降低尿酸治疗(ULTRA)注册的405例患者中,排除了基线SU水平在正常组和CKD组之间没有差异的患者后,对112例患者进行了分析。非布司他治疗后,CKD组SU水平明显低于正常组(6个月时:4.45±1.84 mg/dL vs. 5.62±1.62 mg/dL, p = 0.001; 12个月时:4.81±1.81 mg/dL vs. 5.60±1.94 mg/dL, p = 0.041)。同时,CKD组非布司他的平均剂量低于正常组(6个月时:40.61±22.07 mg∶47.54±19.43 mg, p = 0.110; 12个月时:40.59±21.73 mg∶48.49±19.70 mg, p = 0.064),但差异无统计学意义。结论:因此,基于SU反应的个体化给药策略,而不仅仅是肾功能,可能会优化这些患者的治疗结果。
{"title":"Effectivity and Safety of Febuxostat in Reducing Serum Urate in Gout Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Multicenter ULTRA Registry Study.","authors":"Yoon-Jeong Oh, Hyo Jin Choi, Sang-Hyon Kim, You-Jung Ha, In Ah Choi, Min Jung Kim, Kichul Shin, Hyun-Ok Kim, Sung Won Lee, Joong Kyong Ahn, Chang Hoon Lee, Se Hee Kim, Kyeong Min Son, Ki Won Moon, Chang-Nam Son","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0881","DOIUrl":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0881","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gout, an inflammatory arthritis caused by hyperuricemia, is highly prevalent with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We evaluated longitudinal changes in serum urate (SU) levels and febuxostat dosage according to renal function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 405 patients in the Urate-Lowering Therapy in Gout (ULTRA) registry between November 2021 and December 2023, 112 were analyzed after excluding those with < 1-year follow-up period, nonfebuxostat therapy, or missing data. SU levels and febuxostat doses were compared between the 2 groups at baseline, 6, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline SU levels did not differ between the normal and CKD groups. After febuxostat therapy, mean (SD) SU levels were significantly lower in the CKD group than in the normal group (at 6 months: 4.45 [1.84] mg/dL vs 5.62 [1.62] mg/dL, <i>P</i> = 0.001; at 12 months: 4.81 [1.81] mg/dL vs 5.60 [1.94] mg/dL, <i>P</i> = 0.04). Meanwhile, the mean dosages of febuxostat were lower in CKD group than in the normal group (at 6 months: 40.61 [22.07] mg vs 47.54 [19.43] mg, <i>P</i> = 0.11; at 12 months: 40.59 [21.73] mg vs 48.49 [19.70] mg, <i>P</i> = 0.06), although these differences were not statistically significant. Additionally, the proportion of patients achieving SU < 6 mg/dL at 6 months was higher in the CKD group than in the normal group (91.2% vs 68.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An individualized dosing strategy based on SU response, rather than renal function alone, may optimize treatment outcomes in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"322-328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}