Alcohol use, civilian interference, and other possible risk factors for death during restraint

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL Journal of forensic and legal medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2024.102728
{"title":"Alcohol use, civilian interference, and other possible risk factors for death during restraint","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jflm.2024.102728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Physical restraint is usually used when trying to control and terminate a violent episode. Many causes are possible behind aggressive, agitated, and violent behavior. Some of these are such factors that can either be detected in forensic autopsies or can be evident from the person's medical records. Various causes for deaths during physical restraint have been suggested.</p><p>In this study, we wanted to review all incidents in which physical restraint was employed, ending in death of the restrained person, whether the restraint was applied by police officers, security guards, police custody personnel, health care personnel or ordinary civilians. The main aim was to see if this new kind of study design would increase our knowledge in circumstances and causes leading to death in restraint situations.</p><p>Data was collected retrospectively from all forensic autopsies performed in the Southern Finland area during 2010–2015. We went through 21,036 forensic autopsy cases and found 12 cases (0.06 %) in which a physical restraint was employed before death. Police officers were involved in the physical restraint in 7/12 of the cases: in two of these cases, police alone; in three cases, police and guards; and in two cases, police and health care personnel. Civilians carried out the restraint in 5/12 cases. With civilians responsible for the restraint, the cause of death was more likely considered to be a result of the restraint itself than in cases where police and other authorities were responsible for the restraint. This could be because civilians aren't educated about safe restraint methods, and they might themselves be intoxicated. Alcohol was the most common psychoactive substance found in this study and could be a risk factor for not only aggressive behavior but also death, since alcohol use can provoke cardiac arrhythmias and even sudden death. Based on this study, and previously published studies, we see restraint deaths as a varying spectrum of deaths, in which the death is often possibly a result of many factors, including the effects of agitation and restraint, intoxication, and cardiac and other illnesses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X24000908/pdfft?md5=36d3fa5b6bd7c53876bd37a8ecc4e987&pid=1-s2.0-S1752928X24000908-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X24000908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical restraint is usually used when trying to control and terminate a violent episode. Many causes are possible behind aggressive, agitated, and violent behavior. Some of these are such factors that can either be detected in forensic autopsies or can be evident from the person's medical records. Various causes for deaths during physical restraint have been suggested.

In this study, we wanted to review all incidents in which physical restraint was employed, ending in death of the restrained person, whether the restraint was applied by police officers, security guards, police custody personnel, health care personnel or ordinary civilians. The main aim was to see if this new kind of study design would increase our knowledge in circumstances and causes leading to death in restraint situations.

Data was collected retrospectively from all forensic autopsies performed in the Southern Finland area during 2010–2015. We went through 21,036 forensic autopsy cases and found 12 cases (0.06 %) in which a physical restraint was employed before death. Police officers were involved in the physical restraint in 7/12 of the cases: in two of these cases, police alone; in three cases, police and guards; and in two cases, police and health care personnel. Civilians carried out the restraint in 5/12 cases. With civilians responsible for the restraint, the cause of death was more likely considered to be a result of the restraint itself than in cases where police and other authorities were responsible for the restraint. This could be because civilians aren't educated about safe restraint methods, and they might themselves be intoxicated. Alcohol was the most common psychoactive substance found in this study and could be a risk factor for not only aggressive behavior but also death, since alcohol use can provoke cardiac arrhythmias and even sudden death. Based on this study, and previously published studies, we see restraint deaths as a varying spectrum of deaths, in which the death is often possibly a result of many factors, including the effects of agitation and restraint, intoxication, and cardiac and other illnesses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酗酒、平民干扰及其他可能导致束缚期间死亡的风险因素。
在试图控制和终止暴力事件时,通常会使用物理约束。攻击性、激动和暴力行为背后可能有许多原因。其中一些因素可以在法医尸检中发现,或者可以从当事人的医疗记录中明显看出。人们提出了各种导致在身体束缚期间死亡的原因。在这项研究中,我们希望审查所有使用人身限制措施并导致被限制者死亡的事件,无论使用人身限制措施的是警察、保安人员、警方看守人员、医护人员还是普通平民。研究的主要目的是了解这种新型研究设计是否会增加我们对在限制情况下导致死亡的情况和原因的了解。我们从2010-2015年间在芬兰南部地区进行的所有法医尸检中回顾性地收集了数据。我们对21,036例法医尸检病例进行了分析,发现12例(0.06%)病例在死前使用了人身限制措施。在其中7/12的案例中,警察参与了限制人身自由的行动:其中两例仅由警察实施;三例由警察和警卫实施;两例由警察和医护人员实施。在 5/12 起案件中,限制行动由平民实施。与警察和其他当局负责实施限制措施的案件相比,由平民负责实施限制措施的案件中,死亡原因更有可能被认为是限制措施本身造成的。这可能是因为平民没有接受过关于安全束缚方法的教育,而且他们本身也可能喝醉了。酒精是本研究中发现的最常见的精神活性物质,它不仅可能是导致攻击行为的风险因素,也可能是导致死亡的风险因素,因为饮酒会引发心律失常甚至猝死。根据这项研究和以前发表的研究结果,我们认为束缚致死是一种不同程度的死亡,其中死亡往往可能是多种因素造成的,包括激动和束缚的影响、中毒、心脏疾病和其他疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine publishes topical articles on aspects of forensic and legal medicine. Specifically the Journal supports research that explores the medical principles of care and forensic assessment of individuals, whether adult or child, in contact with the judicial system. It is a fully peer-review hybrid journal with a broad international perspective. The Journal accepts submissions of original research, review articles, and pertinent case studies, editorials, and commentaries in relevant areas of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Context of Practice, and Education and Training. The Journal adheres to strict publication ethical guidelines, and actively supports a culture of inclusive and representative publication.
期刊最新文献
Transfer and persistence of microbiota markers from the human hand to the knife: A preliminary study Analysis of non-metric dental traits for ethnicity identification in a mixed population of Uttar Pradesh An evaluation of potential challenges in forensic psychiatric assessment in Parkinson's disease Femicide in Ireland 2012–2023 A critical assessment of the diatom test of rib bone marrow as a supporting procedure in the case of drowning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1