Jing Li, Huimin Qiao, Yang Yang, Lan Wu, Dongdong Xu, Zhongqiu Lin, Huaiwu Lu
{"title":"Treatment patterns and prognosis of patients with clear cell adenocarcinoma of the cervix: A population-based cohort study.","authors":"Jing Li, Huimin Qiao, Yang Yang, Lan Wu, Dongdong Xu, Zhongqiu Lin, Huaiwu Lu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000001997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe treatment patterns and prognoses for clear cell adenocarcinoma of the cervix (CCAC), a poorly understood rare tumor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case‒control study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, focusing on females diagnosed with CCAC between 2000 and 2019. Kaplan‒Meier analysis, propensity score matching, Cox regression analysis, and subgroup analysis were used to assess treatment outcomes and risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 52,153 patients with cervical cancer in the SEER database, 528 had CCAC. Overall survival (OS) was worse for patients with early-stage and locally advanced CCAC disease, although no differences in survival were observed for patients with stage IVB disease compared to those with other histologies. In our investigation into treatment patterns, we have discovered that surgical treatment was the preferred choice for the majority of patients with locally advanced CCAC (58.5%). Further, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that surgery improved OS in CCAC patients (65.6% vs. 25.3%, P=0.000), with similar results in locally advanced-stage patients (57.9% vs. 26.7%, P=0.000). Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that surgery was significantly associated with a more favorable prognosis in CCAC patients with locally advanced disease (HR 0.299, 95% CI: 0.153-0.585, P=0.000). Consistent findings were observed following propensity score matching (HR 0.283, 95% CI: 0.106-0.751, P=0.011). According to the subgroup analyses, surgical intervention continued to show a beneficial effect on CCAC patients with locally advanced disease (HR=0.31, 95% CI 0.21-0.46, P<0.001). In particular, we also found that compared to patients who received primary radiotherapy (RT), those with CCAC who underwent radical surgery exhibited a significantly prolonged OS in locally advanced CCAC patients. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that surgery was associated with better outcomes in patients with stage IB3-IIA2 and locally resectable stage IIIC patients (HR 0.207, 95% CI=0.043-0.991, P=0.049). However, this trend was not observed for patients with stage IIB-IVA (except locally resectable stage IIIC) CCAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgery should be considered the preferred treatment option for patients with locally advanced CCAC at stage IB3-IIA2 and locally resectable stage IIIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001997","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To describe treatment patterns and prognoses for clear cell adenocarcinoma of the cervix (CCAC), a poorly understood rare tumor.
Methods: A retrospective case‒control study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, focusing on females diagnosed with CCAC between 2000 and 2019. Kaplan‒Meier analysis, propensity score matching, Cox regression analysis, and subgroup analysis were used to assess treatment outcomes and risk factors.
Results: Of the 52,153 patients with cervical cancer in the SEER database, 528 had CCAC. Overall survival (OS) was worse for patients with early-stage and locally advanced CCAC disease, although no differences in survival were observed for patients with stage IVB disease compared to those with other histologies. In our investigation into treatment patterns, we have discovered that surgical treatment was the preferred choice for the majority of patients with locally advanced CCAC (58.5%). Further, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that surgery improved OS in CCAC patients (65.6% vs. 25.3%, P=0.000), with similar results in locally advanced-stage patients (57.9% vs. 26.7%, P=0.000). Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that surgery was significantly associated with a more favorable prognosis in CCAC patients with locally advanced disease (HR 0.299, 95% CI: 0.153-0.585, P=0.000). Consistent findings were observed following propensity score matching (HR 0.283, 95% CI: 0.106-0.751, P=0.011). According to the subgroup analyses, surgical intervention continued to show a beneficial effect on CCAC patients with locally advanced disease (HR=0.31, 95% CI 0.21-0.46, P<0.001). In particular, we also found that compared to patients who received primary radiotherapy (RT), those with CCAC who underwent radical surgery exhibited a significantly prolonged OS in locally advanced CCAC patients. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that surgery was associated with better outcomes in patients with stage IB3-IIA2 and locally resectable stage IIIC patients (HR 0.207, 95% CI=0.043-0.991, P=0.049). However, this trend was not observed for patients with stage IIB-IVA (except locally resectable stage IIIC) CCAC.
Conclusion: Surgery should be considered the preferred treatment option for patients with locally advanced CCAC at stage IB3-IIA2 and locally resectable stage IIIC.
目的:描述宫颈透明细胞腺癌(CCAC)的治疗模式和预后:描述宫颈透明细胞腺癌(CCAC)的治疗模式和预后:方法:利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库开展了一项回顾性病例对照研究,重点关注2000年至2019年期间确诊为CCAC的女性。研究采用卡普兰-梅耶分析、倾向得分匹配、Cox回归分析和亚组分析来评估治疗结果和风险因素:在SEER数据库中的52153名宫颈癌患者中,有528人患有CCAC。早期和局部晚期CCAC患者的总生存期(OS)较差,但IVB期患者的生存期与其他组织病变的患者相比没有差异。在对治疗模式的调查中,我们发现手术治疗是大多数局部晚期CCAC患者(58.5%)的首选。此外,Kaplan-Meier分析显示,手术治疗改善了CCAC患者的OS(65.6% vs. 25.3%,P=0.000),局部晚期患者的OS也得到了类似的改善(57.9% vs. 26.7%,P=0.000)。此外,多变量考克斯回归分析显示,手术与CCAC局部晚期患者更有利的预后显著相关(HR 0.299,95% CI:0.153-0.585,P=0.000)。倾向得分匹配后也观察到了一致的结果(HR 0.283,95% CI:0.106-0.751,P=0.011)。根据亚组分析,手术干预对局部晚期疾病的 CCAC 患者仍有益处(HR=0.31,95% CI 0.21-0.46,P=0.011):手术应被视为IB3-IIA2期和IIIC期局部晚期CCAC患者的首选治疗方案。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.