Impact of an intervention for perinatal anxiety on breastfeeding: findings from the Happy Mother-Healthy Baby randomized controlled trial in Pakistan.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Breastfeeding Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1186/s13006-024-00655-8
Anum Nisar, Haoxue Xiang, Jamie Perin, Abid Malik, Ahmed Zaidi, Najia Atif, Atif Rahman, Pamela J Surkan
{"title":"Impact of an intervention for perinatal anxiety on breastfeeding: findings from the Happy Mother-Healthy Baby randomized controlled trial in Pakistan.","authors":"Anum Nisar, Haoxue Xiang, Jamie Perin, Abid Malik, Ahmed Zaidi, Najia Atif, Atif Rahman, Pamela J Surkan","doi":"10.1186/s13006-024-00655-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study examined the effects of Happy Mother-Healthy Baby (HMHB), a cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention on breastfeeding outcomes for Pakistani women with prenatal anxiety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Breastfeeding practices were evaluated in a randomized controlled trial between 2019 and 2022 in a public hospital in Pakistan. The intervention group was randomized to receive six HMHB sessions targeted towards prenatal anxiety (with breastfeeding discussed in the final session), while both groups also received enhanced usual care. Breastfeeding was defined in four categories: early breastfeeding, exclusive early breastfeeding, recent breastfeeding, and exclusive recent breastfeeding. Early breastfeeding referred to the first 24 h after birth and recent breastfeeding referred to the last 24 h before an assessment at six-weeks postpartum. Potential confounders included were mother's age, baseline depression and anxiety levels, stress, social support, if the first pregnancy (or not) and history of stillbirth or miscarriage as well as child's gestational age, gender. Both intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were examined. Stratified analyses were also used to compare intervention efficacy for those with mild vs severe anxiety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 1307 eligible women invited to participate, 107 declined to participate and 480 were lost to follow-up, resulting in 720 women who completed the postpartum assessment. Both intervention and control arms were similar on demographic characteristics (e.g. sex, age, income, family structure). In the primary intent-to-treat analysis, there was a marginal impact of the intervention on early breastfeeding (OR 1.38, 95% CI: 0.99-1.92; 75.4% (N = 273) vs. 69.0% (N = 247)) and a non-significant association with other breastfeeding outcomes (OR1.42, 95% CI: 0.89-2.27; (47) 12.9% vs. (34) 9.5%, exclusive early breastfeeding; OR 1.48, 95% CI: 0.94-2.35; 90% (N = 327) vs. 86% (N = 309), recent breastfeeding; OR1.01, 95% CI: 0.76-1.35; 49% (N = 178) vs 49% (N = 175) exclusive recent breastfeeding). Among those who completed the intervention's six core sessions, the intervention increased the odds of early breastfeeding (OR1.69, 95% CI:1.12-2.54; 79% (N = 154) vs. 69% (N = 247)) and recent breastfeeding (OR 2.05, 95% CI:1.10-3.81; 93% (N = 181) vs. 86% (N = 309)). For women with mild anxiety at enrolment, the intervention increased the odds of recent breastfeeding (OR 2.41, 95% CI:1.17-5.00; 92% (N = 137) vs. 83% (N = 123).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights the potential of CBT-based interventions like HMHB to enhance breastfeeding among women with mild perinatal anxiety, contingent upon full participation in the intervention.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03880032.</p>","PeriodicalId":54266,"journal":{"name":"International Breastfeeding Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Breastfeeding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-024-00655-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study examined the effects of Happy Mother-Healthy Baby (HMHB), a cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention on breastfeeding outcomes for Pakistani women with prenatal anxiety.

Methods: Breastfeeding practices were evaluated in a randomized controlled trial between 2019 and 2022 in a public hospital in Pakistan. The intervention group was randomized to receive six HMHB sessions targeted towards prenatal anxiety (with breastfeeding discussed in the final session), while both groups also received enhanced usual care. Breastfeeding was defined in four categories: early breastfeeding, exclusive early breastfeeding, recent breastfeeding, and exclusive recent breastfeeding. Early breastfeeding referred to the first 24 h after birth and recent breastfeeding referred to the last 24 h before an assessment at six-weeks postpartum. Potential confounders included were mother's age, baseline depression and anxiety levels, stress, social support, if the first pregnancy (or not) and history of stillbirth or miscarriage as well as child's gestational age, gender. Both intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were examined. Stratified analyses were also used to compare intervention efficacy for those with mild vs severe anxiety.

Results: Out of the 1307 eligible women invited to participate, 107 declined to participate and 480 were lost to follow-up, resulting in 720 women who completed the postpartum assessment. Both intervention and control arms were similar on demographic characteristics (e.g. sex, age, income, family structure). In the primary intent-to-treat analysis, there was a marginal impact of the intervention on early breastfeeding (OR 1.38, 95% CI: 0.99-1.92; 75.4% (N = 273) vs. 69.0% (N = 247)) and a non-significant association with other breastfeeding outcomes (OR1.42, 95% CI: 0.89-2.27; (47) 12.9% vs. (34) 9.5%, exclusive early breastfeeding; OR 1.48, 95% CI: 0.94-2.35; 90% (N = 327) vs. 86% (N = 309), recent breastfeeding; OR1.01, 95% CI: 0.76-1.35; 49% (N = 178) vs 49% (N = 175) exclusive recent breastfeeding). Among those who completed the intervention's six core sessions, the intervention increased the odds of early breastfeeding (OR1.69, 95% CI:1.12-2.54; 79% (N = 154) vs. 69% (N = 247)) and recent breastfeeding (OR 2.05, 95% CI:1.10-3.81; 93% (N = 181) vs. 86% (N = 309)). For women with mild anxiety at enrolment, the intervention increased the odds of recent breastfeeding (OR 2.41, 95% CI:1.17-5.00; 92% (N = 137) vs. 83% (N = 123).

Conclusions: The study highlights the potential of CBT-based interventions like HMHB to enhance breastfeeding among women with mild perinatal anxiety, contingent upon full participation in the intervention.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03880032.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期焦虑干预对母乳喂养的影响:巴基斯坦 "快乐母亲-健康宝宝 "随机对照试验的结果。
研究背景该研究考察了认知行为疗法(CBT)干预 "快乐母亲-健康宝宝"(HMHB)对巴基斯坦产前焦虑妇女母乳喂养结果的影响:2019年至2022年期间,在巴基斯坦的一家公立医院开展了一项随机对照试验,对母乳喂养实践进行了评估。干预组随机接受六次针对产前焦虑的 HMHB 治疗(在最后一次治疗中讨论母乳喂养问题),两组同时接受强化的常规护理。母乳喂养分为四类:早期母乳喂养、完全早期母乳喂养、近期母乳喂养和完全近期母乳喂养。早期母乳喂养指的是产后 24 小时内,近期母乳喂养指的是产后六周评估前的最后 24 小时。潜在的混杂因素包括母亲的年龄、基线抑郁和焦虑水平、压力、社会支持、是否首次怀孕、死胎或流产史以及婴儿的胎龄和性别。对意向治疗和按协议分析进行了研究。此外,还进行了分层分析,以比较轻度焦虑与重度焦虑患者的干预效果:在受邀参加的 1307 名符合条件的妇女中,有 107 人拒绝参加,480 人失去了随访机会,最终有 720 名妇女完成了产后评估。干预组和对照组的人口统计学特征(如性别、年龄、收入、家庭结构)相似。在主要的意向治疗分析中,干预对早期母乳喂养的影响微乎其微(OR 1.38,95% CI:0.99-1.92;75.4%(N = 273)对 69.0%(N = 247)),与其他母乳喂养结果的关系不显著(OR1.42,95% CI:0.89-2.27;(47)12.9% 对(34)9.5%,早期纯母乳喂养;OR1.48,95% CI:0.94-2.35;90%(N = 327)对 86%(N = 309),近期母乳喂养;OR1.01,95% CI:0.76-1.35;49%(N = 178)对 49%(N = 175),近期纯母乳喂养)。在完成干预措施六次核心课程的妇女中,干预措施提高了早期母乳喂养(OR1.69,95% CI:1.12-2.54;79%(N = 154)vs 69%(N = 247))和近期母乳喂养(OR 2.05,95% CI:1.10-3.81;93%(N = 181)vs 86%(N = 309))的几率。对于报名时有轻度焦虑的妇女,干预措施增加了她们近期哺乳的几率(OR 2.41,95% CI:1.17-5.00;92%(N = 137)对 83%(N = 123)):该研究强调了以CBT为基础的干预措施(如HMHB)在促进患有轻度围产期焦虑症的妇女母乳喂养方面的潜力,但前提是她们必须完全参与干预措施:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03880032。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Breastfeeding Journal
International Breastfeeding Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding is recognized as an important public health issue with enormous social and economic implications. Infants who do not receive breast milk are likely to experience poorer health outcomes than breastfed infants; mothers who do not breastfeed increase their own health risks. Publications on the topic of breastfeeding are wide ranging. Articles about breastfeeding are currently published journals focused on nursing, midwifery, paediatric, obstetric, family medicine, public health, immunology, physiology, sociology and many other topics. In addition, electronic publishing allows fast publication time for authors and Open Access ensures the journal is easily accessible to readers.
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting infant feeding choices with a focus on barriers to exclusive breastfeeding in Western Jamaica: a qualitative study Infant formula donations and code violations during earthquake relief efforts in Türkiye in 2023: an observational study. Formal and informal human milk donation in New Zealand: a mixed-method national survey. Experiences of breast milk donors in Sweden: balancing the motivation to do something good with overcoming the challenges it entails. Incidence and factors influencing delayed onset of lactation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1