Quality control efforts of medical institutions: the impacts of a value-based payment system on medical staff and healthcare-associated infections

Abstract

Background

In South Korea, various quality assessments have been introduced to improve the quality of care; as such, the overall level of quality of medical institutions has improved. However, gaps still exist between institutions.

Aim

To evaluate the impact of quality management efforts of medical institutions on securing medical staff and healthcare-associated infections in intensive care units (ICUs).

Methods

This study used data from the second and third ICU quality assessments conducted by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, which included 265 hospitals and 39,096 inpatients. The continuous quality improvement efforts of medical institutions were measured according to changes in their grade based on quality assessment results. In addition, healthcare-associated infection rates were measured, including rates for ventilator-associated pneumonia and catheter-associated infections. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was calculated using generalized estimating equation Poisson regression models that included hospital and patient characteristics.

Results

Healthcare-associated infections occurred in approximately 2% of patients using ventilators or catheters. Ventilator-associated pneumonia increased significantly in institutions with a decline in grade [IRR 2.038, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.426–2.915]. In institutions with an improvement in grade, infections associated with central venous catheters (IRR 0.484, 95% CI 0.330–0.711) and urinary catheters (IRR 0.587, 95% CI 0.398–0.866) decreased.

Conclusions

Although quality assessment has been introduced in ICUs in South Korea, some gaps remain between medical institutions. Differences in securing medical resources through the quality management efforts of medical institutions were observed, and the infection rate was low in hospitals with high-quality management and high in hospitals with low-quality management.