Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.019
Costanza Vicentini, Roberta Bussolino, Elisabetta Kuczewski, Christelle Elias, Anaïs Machut, Sara Bettoni, Matilde Perego, Luca Bresciano, Lorenzo Ramondetti, Arnaud Friggeri, Alain Lepape, Carla Maria Zotti, Stefano Finazzi
Background: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is a priority-1 critical pathogen with limited treatment options and high mortality among intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Italy reports hyperendemic levels, whereas France maintains low prevalence. Understanding cross-border differences is essential to inform infection prevention and control (IPC) and antibiotic stewardship strategies.
Aim: We investigated incidence trends of CRAB infections in ICUs across the French-Italian border and assessed structural, organizational, IPC, and stewardship practices to identify factors associated with infection risk.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter observational study involving ICUs of four cross-border regions (Piemonte, Valle d'Aosta, Auvergne Rhône Alpes, Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur). Data on ICU-acquired bloodstream infections (BSI), central-line associated BSI (CLABSI), pneumonia, and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with CRAB isolates were extracted from the GiViTI and Réa-Rézo surveillance systems (2019-2022). A structured survey explored ICU characteristics, IPC, and stewardship practices. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with CRAB infection episodes.
Results: Overall, 25 ICUs participated in data collection. Among 24,822 ICU admissions, the proportion of A. baumannii isolates that were carbapenem-resistant was 18.75% (95% CI 7.97-34.98) in France and 83.56% (95% CI 80.1-86.63) in Italy. Different approaches to IPC and antibiotic stewardship were highlighted. Structural ICU design, staffing flexibility, and resilient IPC and stewardship practices were associated with lower infection risk.
Conclusion: CRAB incidence was substantially higher in Italy than in France. Cross-border harmonization of surveillance and coordinated preventive strategies are critical to contain cross-border spread.
背景:耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)是重症监护病房(ICU)患者中一种治疗方案有限且死亡率高的1级危重病原体。意大利报告高流行水平,而法国保持低流行率。了解跨境差异对于感染预防和控制(IPC)以及抗生素管理战略至关重要。目的:我们调查了法意边境icu中螃蟹感染的发生率趋势,并评估了结构、组织、IPC和管理实践,以确定与感染风险相关的因素。方法:我们对四个跨境地区(Piemonte、Valle d’aosta、Auvergne Rhône Alpes、Provence Alpes Côte d’azur)的ICUs进行了多中心观察研究。从GiViTI和r - r监测系统(2019-2022)中提取icu获得性血液感染(BSI)、中央静脉相关BSI (CLABSI)、肺炎和呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)与CRAB分离株的数据。一项结构化调查探讨了ICU的特点、IPC和管理实践。进行Logistic回归分析以确定与螃蟹感染发作相关的因素。结果:共有25个icu参与了数据收集。在24,822例ICU入院患者中,法国和意大利鲍曼不雅杆菌对碳青霉烯类药物耐药的比例分别为18.75% (95% CI 7.97-34.98)和83.56% (95% CI 80.1-86.63)。强调了IPC和抗生素管理的不同方法。ICU的结构设计、人员配置的灵活性以及有弹性的IPC和管理实践与较低的感染风险相关。结论:意大利的螃蟹发病率明显高于法国。跨界协调监测和协调预防战略对于遏制跨界传播至关重要。
{"title":"Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections in intensive care units: incidence, infection prevention and control and antimicrobial stewardship practices in the cross-border region between Italy and France, 2019-2022.","authors":"Costanza Vicentini, Roberta Bussolino, Elisabetta Kuczewski, Christelle Elias, Anaïs Machut, Sara Bettoni, Matilde Perego, Luca Bresciano, Lorenzo Ramondetti, Arnaud Friggeri, Alain Lepape, Carla Maria Zotti, Stefano Finazzi","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is a priority-1 critical pathogen with limited treatment options and high mortality among intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Italy reports hyperendemic levels, whereas France maintains low prevalence. Understanding cross-border differences is essential to inform infection prevention and control (IPC) and antibiotic stewardship strategies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We investigated incidence trends of CRAB infections in ICUs across the French-Italian border and assessed structural, organizational, IPC, and stewardship practices to identify factors associated with infection risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter observational study involving ICUs of four cross-border regions (Piemonte, Valle d'Aosta, Auvergne Rhône Alpes, Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur). Data on ICU-acquired bloodstream infections (BSI), central-line associated BSI (CLABSI), pneumonia, and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with CRAB isolates were extracted from the GiViTI and Réa-Rézo surveillance systems (2019-2022). A structured survey explored ICU characteristics, IPC, and stewardship practices. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with CRAB infection episodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 25 ICUs participated in data collection. Among 24,822 ICU admissions, the proportion of A. baumannii isolates that were carbapenem-resistant was 18.75% (95% CI 7.97-34.98) in France and 83.56% (95% CI 80.1-86.63) in Italy. Different approaches to IPC and antibiotic stewardship were highlighted. Structural ICU design, staffing flexibility, and resilient IPC and stewardship practices were associated with lower infection risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRAB incidence was substantially higher in Italy than in France. Cross-border harmonization of surveillance and coordinated preventive strategies are critical to contain cross-border spread.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146144505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background/objectives: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains a major cause of nosocomial diarrhoea, with intensive care (ICU) and intermediate care (IMC) patients experiencing particularly high morbidity and mortality. Although prognostic models exist, predictive accuracy remains limited. This study aimed to identify determinants of adverse CDI outcomes, recurrence, and prolonged hospitalization in a tertiary care setting.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 87 hospitalized CDI cases (2012-2014). Severe CDI was defined by laboratory and clinical criteria. The primary endpoint was major adverse clinical events (MACE-CDI: surgery, in-hospital mortality, or severe-complicated course). Secondary outcomes included recurrence and length of stay. Logistic and linear regression analyses with bootstrap validation (1,000 iterations) were performed.
Results: Among 87 patients (mean age 60.7 ± 15.2 years; 48% ≥65 years; 53% immunosuppressed), 37 (42.5%) required ICU/IMC admission. MACE-CDI occurred in 16.1% and were associated with ICU admission (OR 4.26, 95% CI 1.29-16.76; p=0.017). In-hospital mortality (13.8%) was linked to ICU admission (OR 8.89, 95% CI 2.15-60.65; p=0.0017) and age ≥55 years. Sodium bicarbonate therapy (SBT) predicted poor outcome (OR 2.9, p=0.028). CDI recurrence occurred in 21.8%. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization conferred a >16-fold increased risk in ICU/IMC patients (OR 16.20, p=0.015). Parenteral nutrition (PN) was consistently associated with severe CDI (OR 2.49, p=0.041) and prolonged hospitalization, alongside ascites (p<0.01). Piperacillin/tazobactam and cephalosporin exposure increased nosocomial/severe CDI risk, whereas trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole appeared as a lower-risk substitute.
Conclusions: Older age, ICU admission, ascites, VRE colonization, SBT, and PN correlated with adverse CDI outcomes. These factors may inform stewardship/management strategies in high-risk patients.
背景/目的:艰难梭菌感染(CDI)仍然是院内腹泻的主要原因,重症监护(ICU)和中级护理(IMC)患者的发病率和死亡率特别高。虽然存在预测模型,但预测的准确性仍然有限。本研究旨在确定三级医疗机构中CDI不良结局、复发和延长住院时间的决定因素。方法:回顾性分析2012-2014年住院的87例CDI病例。重度CDI由实验室和临床标准确定。主要终点是主要临床不良事件(MACE-CDI:手术、住院死亡率或严重并发症)。次要结局包括复发和住院时间。进行了逻辑回归和线性回归分析,并进行了bootstrap验证(1000次迭代)。结果:87例患者(平均年龄60.7±15.2岁;48%≥65岁;53%免疫抑制)中,37例(42.5%)需要ICU/IMC住院。MACE-CDI发生率为16.1%,与ICU住院相关(OR 4.26, 95% CI 1.29-16.76; p=0.017)。住院死亡率(13.8%)与ICU住院率(OR 8.89, 95% CI 2.15-60.65; p=0.0017)和年龄≥55岁相关。碳酸氢钠治疗(SBT)预测预后较差(OR 2.9, p=0.028)。CDI复发率为21.8%。万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)定植使ICU/IMC患者的风险增加了16倍(OR 16.20, p=0.015)。肠外营养(PN)与严重CDI (OR 2.49, p=0.041)和延长住院时间以及腹水一致相关(结论:年龄较大、ICU入院、腹水、VRE定植、SBT和PN与不良CDI结局相关)。这些因素可以为高危患者的管理策略提供信息。
{"title":"From Ward to ICU: Clinical Drivers of Adverse Outcomes in Clostridioides difficile Infection - A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Mohamad Amer Nashtar, Gizem Garipoglu, Isabella Traut, Ali Canbay, Antonios Katsounas","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains a major cause of nosocomial diarrhoea, with intensive care (ICU) and intermediate care (IMC) patients experiencing particularly high morbidity and mortality. Although prognostic models exist, predictive accuracy remains limited. This study aimed to identify determinants of adverse CDI outcomes, recurrence, and prolonged hospitalization in a tertiary care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 87 hospitalized CDI cases (2012-2014). Severe CDI was defined by laboratory and clinical criteria. The primary endpoint was major adverse clinical events (MACE-CDI: surgery, in-hospital mortality, or severe-complicated course). Secondary outcomes included recurrence and length of stay. Logistic and linear regression analyses with bootstrap validation (1,000 iterations) were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 87 patients (mean age 60.7 ± 15.2 years; 48% ≥65 years; 53% immunosuppressed), 37 (42.5%) required ICU/IMC admission. MACE-CDI occurred in 16.1% and were associated with ICU admission (OR 4.26, 95% CI 1.29-16.76; p=0.017). In-hospital mortality (13.8%) was linked to ICU admission (OR 8.89, 95% CI 2.15-60.65; p=0.0017) and age ≥55 years. Sodium bicarbonate therapy (SBT) predicted poor outcome (OR 2.9, p=0.028). CDI recurrence occurred in 21.8%. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization conferred a >16-fold increased risk in ICU/IMC patients (OR 16.20, p=0.015). Parenteral nutrition (PN) was consistently associated with severe CDI (OR 2.49, p=0.041) and prolonged hospitalization, alongside ascites (p<0.01). Piperacillin/tazobactam and cephalosporin exposure increased nosocomial/severe CDI risk, whereas trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole appeared as a lower-risk substitute.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older age, ICU admission, ascites, VRE colonization, SBT, and PN correlated with adverse CDI outcomes. These factors may inform stewardship/management strategies in high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146137440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-05DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.017
Charles E McCafferty, James O Townsend, Stephen D Bacchi, Slade O Jensen
Background: Rises in the prevalence of multi-drug-resistant organisms threatens patient safety globally. Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE) and Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are linked with prolonged hospitalisation, treatment failure, and increased mortality. Decolonisation strategies could reduce transmission and improve outcomes; but their efficacy and safety remain uncertain. This study systematically evaluates decolonisation protocols for VRE and CRE through meta-analysis.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on studies using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies evaluating decolonisation protocols for VRE and CRE were included. Papers were assessed for risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis were performed using RevMan.
Results: 16 studies with a total of 872 participants were included for meta-analysis. FMT significantly improved clearance of CRE (RR 2.01; 95% CI 1.27-3.18) and VRE (RR 2.96, 95% CI 1.60-5.47) compared to controls, with low to moderate heterogeneity. SDD significantly increased clearance of CRE (RR 2.47, 95% CI 1.32-4.63), but not VRE (RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.70-3.30). Adverse events were generally mild, but SDD was associated with increased antimicrobial resistance in several studies.
Conclusions: FMT and SDD are promising interventions for CRE decolonisation; with FMT also showing benefit in VRE. The durability of SDD effects appears limited, with significant risk of promoting resistance. Future studies should standardise endpoints, evaluate combination approaches, and explore bacteriophage therapy. We suggest implementing uniform terminology with "provisional clearance" as a descriptor for eradication at 1-month post-intervention and "enduring clearance" following continuous eradication for 6 months.
背景:耐多药微生物流行率的上升威胁着全球患者的安全。万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)和碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌科(CRE)与住院时间延长、治疗失败和死亡率增加有关。非殖民化战略可以减少传播并改善结果;但它们的功效和安全性仍不确定。本研究通过荟萃分析系统地评估了VRE和CRE的非殖民化方案。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,对PubMed、ScienceDirect、Web of Science和Scopus上的研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析。包括评估VRE和CRE非殖民化方案的研究。使用风险偏倚2和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估论文的偏倚风险。采用RevMan软件进行meta分析。结果:16项研究共纳入872名受试者进行meta分析。与对照组相比,FMT显著提高了CRE清除率(RR 2.01; 95% CI 1.27-3.18)和VRE清除率(RR 2.96, 95% CI 1.60-5.47),异质性低至中等。SDD显著增加CRE清除率(RR 2.47, 95% CI 1.32-4.63),但不增加VRE清除率(RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.70-3.30)。不良事件通常是轻微的,但在一些研究中,SDD与抗菌素耐药性增加有关。结论:FMT和SDD是CRE去殖民化的有效干预措施;FMT对VRE也有好处。SDD效应的持久性似乎有限,有促进耐药性的重大风险。未来的研究应该标准化终点,评估联合方法,并探索噬菌体治疗。我们建议使用统一的术语,在干预后1个月用“临时清除”来描述根除,在连续根除6个月后用“持久清除”来描述根除。
{"title":"Protocols for Decolonisation of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Charles E McCafferty, James O Townsend, Stephen D Bacchi, Slade O Jensen","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rises in the prevalence of multi-drug-resistant organisms threatens patient safety globally. Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE) and Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are linked with prolonged hospitalisation, treatment failure, and increased mortality. Decolonisation strategies could reduce transmission and improve outcomes; but their efficacy and safety remain uncertain. This study systematically evaluates decolonisation protocols for VRE and CRE through meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on studies using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies evaluating decolonisation protocols for VRE and CRE were included. Papers were assessed for risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis were performed using RevMan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16 studies with a total of 872 participants were included for meta-analysis. FMT significantly improved clearance of CRE (RR 2.01; 95% CI 1.27-3.18) and VRE (RR 2.96, 95% CI 1.60-5.47) compared to controls, with low to moderate heterogeneity. SDD significantly increased clearance of CRE (RR 2.47, 95% CI 1.32-4.63), but not VRE (RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.70-3.30). Adverse events were generally mild, but SDD was associated with increased antimicrobial resistance in several studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FMT and SDD are promising interventions for CRE decolonisation; with FMT also showing benefit in VRE. The durability of SDD effects appears limited, with significant risk of promoting resistance. Future studies should standardise endpoints, evaluate combination approaches, and explore bacteriophage therapy. We suggest implementing uniform terminology with \"provisional clearance\" as a descriptor for eradication at 1-month post-intervention and \"enduring clearance\" following continuous eradication for 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146137633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.018
Eleanor Soothill, Stephanie Harris, Barbara Brekle, Jane Galbraith, Rex Galbraith, Shemiah Hastick, Grace Njogu, Nathaniel Storey, Surjo De, James Soothill
{"title":"Acidic Foaming Limescale Remover is Highly Effective in Killing Multi-Resistant Gram-Negative Species of Bacteria in Hospital Sink Traps.","authors":"Eleanor Soothill, Stephanie Harris, Barbara Brekle, Jane Galbraith, Rex Galbraith, Shemiah Hastick, Grace Njogu, Nathaniel Storey, Surjo De, James Soothill","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146127590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.015
Muhammad Taufan Umasugi
{"title":"Enhancing the Efficacy of Mask Training and Fit Testing: Respone to Rao et al. (2025).","authors":"Muhammad Taufan Umasugi","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146121211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.016
Clare Foster, Dale Weston, Laura Maynard Smith, Emma McGuire, Jo Taylor-Egbeyemi, Holly Carter, Carole Fry, Lisa Ritchie, Mark Wilcox, Jacqui S Reilly, Colin S Brown, Ashley Sharp
Background: Guidance on the use of fluid-resistant surgical masks (FRSM) and filtering face-piece (FFP3) masks by healthcare staff in England is produced nationally and applied locally by hospital trusts. In April 2022, national infection prevention and control (IPC) guidance was updated with reference to the importance of local risk assessment when considering use of FFP3 masks.
Aim: Our aim was to evaluate local hospital policies for use of face masks and risk assessment for healthcare staff.
Methods: A cross-sectional online survey (February-March 2023) of NHS trusts in England. Responses were analysed using Fisher's Exact tests and the framework approach.
Results: Fifty nine percent (109/186) of eligible hospital trusts responded. All trusts required staff to wear FRSM or FFP3 when providing direct care to patients with suspected respiratory viral infection (RVI); 87% (95/109) and 13% (14/109) respectively. FFP3s were required by 13% of trusts (14/109) when providing direct care to individuals with suspected RVI and by 9% of trusts (10/109) when present in a bay/ward with patients with suspected RVI. Over half of trusts used locally developed risk assessment tools.
Conclusions: There was clear variation in policies for use of face masks and use of workplace and individual risk assessments across hospital trusts. There was also variation in application of mask use, fit testing and audit of adherence. Further work is required to explore whether development of further guidance and national implementation tools could reduce unwarranted variation.
{"title":"Infection Prevention and Control risk assessment and policy for respiratory viral infections in NHS trusts in England: a national survey.","authors":"Clare Foster, Dale Weston, Laura Maynard Smith, Emma McGuire, Jo Taylor-Egbeyemi, Holly Carter, Carole Fry, Lisa Ritchie, Mark Wilcox, Jacqui S Reilly, Colin S Brown, Ashley Sharp","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidance on the use of fluid-resistant surgical masks (FRSM) and filtering face-piece (FFP3) masks by healthcare staff in England is produced nationally and applied locally by hospital trusts. In April 2022, national infection prevention and control (IPC) guidance was updated with reference to the importance of local risk assessment when considering use of FFP3 masks.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Our aim was to evaluate local hospital policies for use of face masks and risk assessment for healthcare staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey (February-March 2023) of NHS trusts in England. Responses were analysed using Fisher's Exact tests and the framework approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty nine percent (109/186) of eligible hospital trusts responded. All trusts required staff to wear FRSM or FFP3 when providing direct care to patients with suspected respiratory viral infection (RVI); 87% (95/109) and 13% (14/109) respectively. FFP3s were required by 13% of trusts (14/109) when providing direct care to individuals with suspected RVI and by 9% of trusts (10/109) when present in a bay/ward with patients with suspected RVI. Over half of trusts used locally developed risk assessment tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was clear variation in policies for use of face masks and use of workplace and individual risk assessments across hospital trusts. There was also variation in application of mask use, fit testing and audit of adherence. Further work is required to explore whether development of further guidance and national implementation tools could reduce unwarranted variation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Access to safe drinking water is critical for patient care and infection prevention in healthcare facilities (HCFs). In Sindh, Pakistan, limited monitoring data exist despite widespread reports of contamination.
Objective: To evaluate the physicochemical and microbiological quality of drinking water supplied to HCFs across Sindh and assess associated patient safety risks to inform infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies and guide water quality interventions.
Methods: A total of 280 water samples were collected from 136 HCFs across 26 districts and analysed for key physicochemical parameters and microbial contamination indicators (total coliforms, Escherichia coli) were analyzed following APHA standards. Data were interpreted against WHO drinking water guidelines. Multivariate, facies and hydrochemical interpretation were applied to explain contamination sources and controls.
Results: Contamination patterns were highly variable spatially, with groundwater sources contributing primarily to salinity, hardness and sodium exceedances, whereas surface water sources were associated with turbidity and microbial risks. Filtration plants demonstrated variable performance. District level exceedances identified clear contamination hotspots that require targeted intervention rather than uniform policy responses. TDS exceeded WHO limits in 30% of samples, particularly in NFR, SHK, SNG and UMK. Turbidity exceeded permissible values in 20.7% of samples, mainly in THA, SUJ and SUK. Chloride and hardness exceeded guideline limits in 22.1% and 16.1% samples, respectively, predominantly in groundwater. Sodium exceeded limits in 25% of samples. Fluoride and arsenic contamination remained localized. Microbiological contamination was widespread, with total coliforms detected in 76.3% and E. coli in 18.6% of samples. Multivariate analyses provided further insights; PCA identified mineralization (PC1, 49.45%) and carbonate equilibrium (PC2, 10.63%) as key controls, while hydrochemical facies analysis distinguished precipitation-dominated Ca-Mg-HCO3 waters, rock-dominated Na+ enrichment, and evaporation driven Na+-Cl--SO42- salinization.
Conclusions: A substantial proportion of drinking water in Sindh HCFs does not meet WHO standards, presenting significant microbiological and chemical risks. Strengthened monitoring, effective disinfection, and Water Safety Plans are urgently required to safeguard IPC and patient health in line with global IPC priorities and Sustainable Development Goal 6.
{"title":"Drinking Water Quality in Public Healthcare Facilities in Sindh, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Assessment of Microbial and Physicochemical Contaminants.","authors":"Ghulam Murtaza Arain, Nazia Sattar, Zafar Fatmi, Sumaira Khatoon, Nabeel Ali Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to safe drinking water is critical for patient care and infection prevention in healthcare facilities (HCFs). In Sindh, Pakistan, limited monitoring data exist despite widespread reports of contamination.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the physicochemical and microbiological quality of drinking water supplied to HCFs across Sindh and assess associated patient safety risks to inform infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies and guide water quality interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 280 water samples were collected from 136 HCFs across 26 districts and analysed for key physicochemical parameters and microbial contamination indicators (total coliforms, Escherichia coli) were analyzed following APHA standards. Data were interpreted against WHO drinking water guidelines. Multivariate, facies and hydrochemical interpretation were applied to explain contamination sources and controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contamination patterns were highly variable spatially, with groundwater sources contributing primarily to salinity, hardness and sodium exceedances, whereas surface water sources were associated with turbidity and microbial risks. Filtration plants demonstrated variable performance. District level exceedances identified clear contamination hotspots that require targeted intervention rather than uniform policy responses. TDS exceeded WHO limits in 30% of samples, particularly in NFR, SHK, SNG and UMK. Turbidity exceeded permissible values in 20.7% of samples, mainly in THA, SUJ and SUK. Chloride and hardness exceeded guideline limits in 22.1% and 16.1% samples, respectively, predominantly in groundwater. Sodium exceeded limits in 25% of samples. Fluoride and arsenic contamination remained localized. Microbiological contamination was widespread, with total coliforms detected in 76.3% and E. coli in 18.6% of samples. Multivariate analyses provided further insights; PCA identified mineralization (PC1, 49.45%) and carbonate equilibrium (PC2, 10.63%) as key controls, while hydrochemical facies analysis distinguished precipitation-dominated Ca-Mg-HCO<sub>3</sub> waters, rock-dominated Na<sup>+</sup> enrichment, and evaporation driven Na<sup>+</sup>-Cl<sup>-</sup>-SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> salinization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A substantial proportion of drinking water in Sindh HCFs does not meet WHO standards, presenting significant microbiological and chemical risks. Strengthened monitoring, effective disinfection, and Water Safety Plans are urgently required to safeguard IPC and patient health in line with global IPC priorities and Sustainable Development Goal 6.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.011
Jonathan A Otter, Luke S P Moore, James R Price, Emily Smith, Leila Hail, Jane Hodson, Phillip Norville
Blood culture contamination (BCC) is a frequent and costly challenge in clinical diagnostics. BCC leads to extended hospital stays, unnecessary antimicrobial therapy, diagnostic delays, and increased healthcare costs, sometimes exceeding $100,000 per case depending on the scope of analysis. It also contributes to environmental waste and reputational harm. Blood culture diversion (BCD), particularly via blood culture diversion devices (BCDDs), has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce BCC. BCDDs divert initial blood flow likely contaminated with skin flora, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy. This scoping review analysed 23 studies, including randomized controlled trials and observational designs. BCD was an effective way to reduce the rate of BCC. BCDDs consistently outperformed open diversion methods in reducing BCC rates. However, findings on their impact on antimicrobial usage, hospital length of stay, and cost-effectiveness varied. Some studies reported significant cost savings and reduced vancomycin use, while others showed minimal change. Barriers to BCDD adoption include financial constraints, inconsistent definitions of BCC, and variable staff compliance. Enablers include positive user feedback, targeted training, and integration into national surveillance frameworks. Evidence gaps remain in comparative effectiveness, sustainability metrics, and behavioural factors influencing implementation. The review recommends broader adoption of BCDDs, particularly in high-risk settings, emphasising the need for local data to identify where implementation will be most effective. It also calls for standardized definitions, improved surveillance, and further research into broader clinical, economic, and environmental outcomes.
{"title":"Impact, barriers, and facilitators of blood culture diversion devices to reduce blood culture contamination and improve patient safety: a scoping review.","authors":"Jonathan A Otter, Luke S P Moore, James R Price, Emily Smith, Leila Hail, Jane Hodson, Phillip Norville","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood culture contamination (BCC) is a frequent and costly challenge in clinical diagnostics. BCC leads to extended hospital stays, unnecessary antimicrobial therapy, diagnostic delays, and increased healthcare costs, sometimes exceeding $100,000 per case depending on the scope of analysis. It also contributes to environmental waste and reputational harm. Blood culture diversion (BCD), particularly via blood culture diversion devices (BCDDs), has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce BCC. BCDDs divert initial blood flow likely contaminated with skin flora, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy. This scoping review analysed 23 studies, including randomized controlled trials and observational designs. BCD was an effective way to reduce the rate of BCC. BCDDs consistently outperformed open diversion methods in reducing BCC rates. However, findings on their impact on antimicrobial usage, hospital length of stay, and cost-effectiveness varied. Some studies reported significant cost savings and reduced vancomycin use, while others showed minimal change. Barriers to BCDD adoption include financial constraints, inconsistent definitions of BCC, and variable staff compliance. Enablers include positive user feedback, targeted training, and integration into national surveillance frameworks. Evidence gaps remain in comparative effectiveness, sustainability metrics, and behavioural factors influencing implementation. The review recommends broader adoption of BCDDs, particularly in high-risk settings, emphasising the need for local data to identify where implementation will be most effective. It also calls for standardized definitions, improved surveillance, and further research into broader clinical, economic, and environmental outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146097668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.010
Yunfan Cheng, Lili Yuan, Min Zhu, Yunjia Yang, Linghong Gan, Dongfang Lin, Fan Yang
{"title":"Implications of deduplication methods used by the first isolate strategy and episode-based strategy on the detection rates of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) in hospitalized patients.","authors":"Yunfan Cheng, Lili Yuan, Min Zhu, Yunjia Yang, Linghong Gan, Dongfang Lin, Fan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146097642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.013
M A Chalker, K Browne, P L Russo, B G Mitchell
Background: Non-ventilator-associated pneumonia (NV-HAP), a subset of healthcare-associated pneumonia (HAP), is common and significantly increases patient mortality and hospital stay. However, no systematic review has been undertaken to synthesise the impact of NV-HAP on these outcomes.
Aim: To undertake a review of the evidence on the impact of NV-HAP on mortality and additional length of stay in adults admitted to an acute care hospital.
Methods: We performed a systematic search to identify research exploring and evaluating the impact of NV-HAP on mortality and additional length of stay in adults admitted to an acute care hospital. The electronic databases MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched, for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2004 and August 2025. An assessment of the study quality and risk of bias of included articles was conducted using the ROBINS-E and ROBINS-I tool.
Findings: 6324 studies were initially identified with 49 articles included in the review following the screening and full-text review. Twenty-six papers identified both mortality and additional length of stay results, 21 papers identified mortality results only and two papers reported additional length of stay results only. Inpatient mortality following NV-HAP ranged from 3.1 - 73.9%. Additional length of stay associated with NV-HAP was extended between 10 - 47.5 days.
Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the impact of NV-HAP on patients admitted to hospital. NV-HAP was associated with patient mortality and additional length of stay. Results of this study will inform a larger planned program of research.
{"title":"Impact of non-ventilator healthcare-associated pneumonia on mortality and additional length of stay in adults admitted to an acute care hospital: A systematic review.","authors":"M A Chalker, K Browne, P L Russo, B G Mitchell","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.01.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-ventilator-associated pneumonia (NV-HAP), a subset of healthcare-associated pneumonia (HAP), is common and significantly increases patient mortality and hospital stay. However, no systematic review has been undertaken to synthesise the impact of NV-HAP on these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To undertake a review of the evidence on the impact of NV-HAP on mortality and additional length of stay in adults admitted to an acute care hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search to identify research exploring and evaluating the impact of NV-HAP on mortality and additional length of stay in adults admitted to an acute care hospital. The electronic databases MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched, for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2004 and August 2025. An assessment of the study quality and risk of bias of included articles was conducted using the ROBINS-E and ROBINS-I tool.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>6324 studies were initially identified with 49 articles included in the review following the screening and full-text review. Twenty-six papers identified both mortality and additional length of stay results, 21 papers identified mortality results only and two papers reported additional length of stay results only. Inpatient mortality following NV-HAP ranged from 3.1 - 73.9%. Additional length of stay associated with NV-HAP was extended between 10 - 47.5 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review highlights the impact of NV-HAP on patients admitted to hospital. NV-HAP was associated with patient mortality and additional length of stay. Results of this study will inform a larger planned program of research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146097679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}