Trends in utilization patterns of newer glucose-lowering drugs in US adults with type 2 diabetes and a history of coronary heart disease or heart failure: 2005–2019

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Primary Care Diabetes Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.pcd.2024.07.003
{"title":"Trends in utilization patterns of newer glucose-lowering drugs in US adults with type 2 diabetes and a history of coronary heart disease or heart failure: 2005–2019","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The newer glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), including Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), have demonstrated superior cardio- and renal protective benefits compared to older GLDs in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD).</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study examined the trends of the newer GLDs use in people with T2D who had a history of coronary heart disease or heart failure in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We used 2005–2019 data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Individuals with self-reported diabetes and CVD history were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a steady increase in the use of GLP-1RA only from 2008 (3 %) to 2019 (21 %) and SGLT2i only from 2014 (5 %) to 2019 (12 %). Individuals with dual use of both newer GLD classes increased from 0.62 % in 2015 to 6 % in 2019. The overall uptake of these two newer drugs in 2019 was less than 40 %. In other words, 60 % of individuals who can substantially benefit from these newer treatments did not use the treatments.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i among individuals with T2D and a history of CVD was low and varied by insurance type. Policy-level interventions are needed to improve the use of these newer treatments further.</p></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><p>We examined how newer glucose-lowering drugs are used among individuals with type 2 diabetes and at high risk for coronary heart disease or heart failure in the US. We found that 60 % of individuals who can substantially benefit from these newer treatments did not use the treatments due to the variation of insurance type.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48997,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175199182400158X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The newer glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), including Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), have demonstrated superior cardio- and renal protective benefits compared to older GLDs in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Objective

This study examined the trends of the newer GLDs use in people with T2D who had a history of coronary heart disease or heart failure in the United States.

Method

We used 2005–2019 data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Individuals with self-reported diabetes and CVD history were identified.

Results

There was a steady increase in the use of GLP-1RA only from 2008 (3 %) to 2019 (21 %) and SGLT2i only from 2014 (5 %) to 2019 (12 %). Individuals with dual use of both newer GLD classes increased from 0.62 % in 2015 to 6 % in 2019. The overall uptake of these two newer drugs in 2019 was less than 40 %. In other words, 60 % of individuals who can substantially benefit from these newer treatments did not use the treatments.

Conclusion

The use of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i among individuals with T2D and a history of CVD was low and varied by insurance type. Policy-level interventions are needed to improve the use of these newer treatments further.

Summary

We examined how newer glucose-lowering drugs are used among individuals with type 2 diabetes and at high risk for coronary heart disease or heart failure in the US. We found that 60 % of individuals who can substantially benefit from these newer treatments did not use the treatments due to the variation of insurance type.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国 2 型糖尿病且有冠心病或心力衰竭病史的成人使用新型降糖药的模式趋势:2005-2019 年。
背景:较新的降糖药物(GLDs),包括胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)和钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2抑制剂(SGLT2i),在心血管疾病(CVD)高风险2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中的心血管和肾脏保护作用优于较老的GLDs:本研究探讨了美国有冠心病或心力衰竭病史的 2 型糖尿病患者使用新型 GLDs 的趋势:我们使用了 2005-2019 年医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)的数据。方法:我们使用了 2005-2019 年医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)的数据,对自述有糖尿病和心血管疾病史的个体进行了识别:结果:从 2008 年(3%)到 2019 年(21%),仅使用 GLP-1RA 的患者稳步增加;从 2014 年(5%)到 2019 年(12%),仅使用 SGLT2i 的患者稳步增加。同时使用两种较新 GLD 类药物的患者从 2015 年的 0.62% 增加到 2019 年的 6%。2019 年这两种较新药物的总体使用率不到 40%。换句话说,60%能够从这些较新疗法中大幅获益的人并未使用这些疗法:GLP-1RA和SGLT2i在有心血管疾病史的T2D患者中使用率较低,且因保险类型而异。总结:我们研究了美国 2 型糖尿病患者和冠心病或心力衰竭高危人群使用新型降糖药物的情况。我们发现,由于保险类型的不同,60% 可从这些较新治疗方法中获益的患者并未使用这些治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Primary Care Diabetes
Primary Care Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
134
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research articles and high quality reviews in the fields of clinical care, diabetes education, nutrition, health services, psychosocial research and epidemiology and other areas as far as is relevant for diabetology in a primary-care setting. The purpose of the journal is to encourage interdisciplinary research and discussion between all those who are involved in primary diabetes care on an international level. The Journal also publishes news and articles concerning the policies and activities of Primary Care Diabetes Europe and reflects the society''s aim of improving the care for people with diabetes mellitus within the primary-care setting.
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board and Aims & Scopes Vision loss and diabetic retinopathy prevalence and risk among a cohort of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians with type 2 diabetes receiving renal haemodialysis treatment: The retinopathy in people currently on renal dialysis (RiPCORD) study Glycemic status and effect on mortality: Multifactorial prevention programme for cardiovascular disease in Finnish primary care Efficacy of a health education technology program in improving adherence to self-management behaviors and quality of life among adults with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1