A guide to conducting intersectional phenomenological research in family science

IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Family Theory & Review Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1111/jftr.12580
Jaclyn Elisa Keenoy, Romi Paldi, Yasmine Perry, Melissa Screven, Brad van Eeden-Moorefield
{"title":"A guide to conducting intersectional phenomenological research in family science","authors":"Jaclyn Elisa Keenoy,&nbsp;Romi Paldi,&nbsp;Yasmine Perry,&nbsp;Melissa Screven,&nbsp;Brad van Eeden-Moorefield","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An increasing number of scholars suggest the need to enhance the incorporation of diversity and social justice across all areas of family science. Part of this work has seen family science more strongly and explicitly incorporate intersectional theorizing to problematize individual biases and power positions, generally, and of researchers and participants, more specifically. More work is needed to connect theory, method, and methodology to advance the call of scholars. Here, we attend to this call by providing methodological considerations for conducting intersectional phenomenological research in family science. We begin with an overview of phenomenology, including its philosophical and methodological foundations and variations. We then introduce the history of intersectionality, followed by critical methodological considerations for intersectional phenomenological research in family science. This integration of intersectionality and phenomenological research centers the lived experiences of individuals and families with historically marginalized identities while attending to power dynamics often part of scholarship.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jftr.12580","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An increasing number of scholars suggest the need to enhance the incorporation of diversity and social justice across all areas of family science. Part of this work has seen family science more strongly and explicitly incorporate intersectional theorizing to problematize individual biases and power positions, generally, and of researchers and participants, more specifically. More work is needed to connect theory, method, and methodology to advance the call of scholars. Here, we attend to this call by providing methodological considerations for conducting intersectional phenomenological research in family science. We begin with an overview of phenomenology, including its philosophical and methodological foundations and variations. We then introduce the history of intersectionality, followed by critical methodological considerations for intersectional phenomenological research in family science. This integration of intersectionality and phenomenological research centers the lived experiences of individuals and families with historically marginalized identities while attending to power dynamics often part of scholarship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭科学交叉现象学研究指南
越来越多的学者提出,有必要在家庭科学的各个领域加强多样性和社会公正。其中一项工作是,家庭科学更有力、更明确地纳入交叉理论,以解决个人偏见和权力地位的问题,具体而言就是研究人员和参与者的偏见和权力地位的问题。还需要做更多的工作,将理论、方法和方法论联系起来,以推动学者们的呼吁。在此,我们通过提供在家庭科学中开展交叉现象学研究的方法论考虑,来响应这一号召。我们首先概述了现象学,包括其哲学和方法论基础及变体。然后,我们介绍了交叉性的历史,接着介绍了在家庭科学中开展交叉现象学研究的关键方法论考虑因素。这种交叉性与现象学研究的结合,以具有历史边缘化身份的个人和家庭的生活经验为中心,同时关注通常属于学术研究一部分的权力动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Intergenerational coparenting and child development outcomes: A systematic review Parent–child discrepancies in mate preferences: A three‐level meta‐analysis Don't skip class: A new conceptual model for examining classism among adolescents and families Bringing birth fathers to the forefront: A two‐decade scoping review of birth father experiences in adoption Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1