Understanding the Impact of Military Service on Support for Insurrection in the United States

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Conflict Resolution Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1177/00220027241267216
Robert A. Pape, Keven G. Ruby, Kyle D. Larson, Kentaro Nakamura
{"title":"Understanding the Impact of Military Service on Support for Insurrection in the United States","authors":"Robert A. Pape, Keven G. Ruby, Kyle D. Larson, Kentaro Nakamura","doi":"10.1177/00220027241267216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why do some individuals with military experience support the insurrection of January 6? With US military veterans playing a central role in the assault on the US Capitol, answering this question is of immediate scholarly and policy concern. To better understand the impact of military service, we conducted the first nationally representative survey of support for pro-Trump anti-democratic violence (“insurrectionist sentiments”) among US military veterans and a demographically matched sample of non-veterans. Our analysis finds veterans nearly twice as likely to hold high insurrectionist sentiments than non-veterans, and that military service increases support for restoring Trump to the presidency by force by 15 percent. Further, we find the effect veterancy is not fully explained by veterans being more likely to hold pro-Trump or conspiracy beliefs but is associated with negative military and post-service-related experiences. These findings are robust to significant unobserved confounding. We conclude with implications for future research on political violence and the role of the military in American democracy.","PeriodicalId":51363,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conflict Resolution","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conflict Resolution","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027241267216","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why do some individuals with military experience support the insurrection of January 6? With US military veterans playing a central role in the assault on the US Capitol, answering this question is of immediate scholarly and policy concern. To better understand the impact of military service, we conducted the first nationally representative survey of support for pro-Trump anti-democratic violence (“insurrectionist sentiments”) among US military veterans and a demographically matched sample of non-veterans. Our analysis finds veterans nearly twice as likely to hold high insurrectionist sentiments than non-veterans, and that military service increases support for restoring Trump to the presidency by force by 15 percent. Further, we find the effect veterancy is not fully explained by veterans being more likely to hold pro-Trump or conspiracy beliefs but is associated with negative military and post-service-related experiences. These findings are robust to significant unobserved confounding. We conclude with implications for future research on political violence and the role of the military in American democracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解服兵役对支持美国叛乱的影响
为什么一些有从军经历的人支持 1 月 6 日的叛乱?由于美国退伍军人在袭击美国国会大厦的事件中扮演了核心角色,回答这个问题是学术界和政策界的当务之急。为了更好地了解服兵役的影响,我们首次在美国退伍军人和人口匹配的非退伍军人样本中开展了支持亲特朗普反民主暴力("叛乱情绪")的全国代表性调查。我们的分析发现,与非退伍军人相比,退伍军人持有高叛乱情绪的可能性几乎是后者的两倍,而且服兵役会使通过武力恢复特朗普总统职位的支持率增加 15%。此外,我们发现退伍军人的影响并不能完全解释为退伍军人更有可能持有亲特朗普或阴谋论信仰,而是与消极的军队和服役后相关经历有关。这些发现对重大的非观察混杂因素具有稳健性。最后,我们总结了未来研究政治暴力和军队在美国民主中的作用的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: The Journal of Conflict Resolution is an interdisciplinary journal of social scientific theory and research on human conflict. It focuses especially on international conflict, but its pages are open to a variety of contributions about intergroup conflict, as well as between nations, that may help in understanding problems of war and peace. Reports about innovative applications, as well as basic research, are welcomed, especially when the results are of interest to scholars in several disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Economic Decoupling as a Readiness Signaling Device Why do Armed Groups Return to War after Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration? Introducing the DDR-40 Dataset (1980–2020) Two Dilemmas in the Politics of Ethnic Federalism: Experimental Evidence From Ethiopia Seeing what Citizens Miss: How Monitors Improve Election Violence Reporting Poverty and Prejudice: Evidence From Myanmar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1