{"title":"Building Trust in Teams: Engaging Less Conscientious Team Members through Team Workload-Sharing","authors":"Priti Pradhan Shah, Stephen L. Jones, Jin Park","doi":"10.1177/10596011241270003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Members of teams act as trustors, judging the trustworthiness of their teammates who are the trustees or targets of trust. Trustees who are less conscientious may be viewed as less trustworthy. But, we identify a team-based solution to engage less-conscientious teammates, which removes the adverse influence of low conscientiousness on perceived trustworthiness. Study 1 finds that team members have, on average, higher perceptions of their teammates’ trustworthiness when workload in the team is equitably shared and not imbalanced. Furthermore, it suggests that team workload sharing provides a way to ameliorate a lack of trust in low conscientious teammates. That is, team workload sharing moderates the link between trustee conscientiousness and perceived trustworthiness: in teams with high levels of workload sharing, less conscientious trustees are judged to be as trustworthy as their more conscientious peers. Study 2 replicates these findings and, unlike Study 1, it provides a clear main effect of trustee conscientiousness on perceived trustworthiness, and it reveals differences in the magnitude of the hypothesized effects at different periods of a team’s existence and for different dimensions of perceived trustworthiness. We conclude by suggesting strategies that can increase perceptions of trustworthiness within firms by using team processes that promote trustworthy behaviors.","PeriodicalId":48143,"journal":{"name":"Group & Organization Management","volume":"173 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group & Organization Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241270003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Members of teams act as trustors, judging the trustworthiness of their teammates who are the trustees or targets of trust. Trustees who are less conscientious may be viewed as less trustworthy. But, we identify a team-based solution to engage less-conscientious teammates, which removes the adverse influence of low conscientiousness on perceived trustworthiness. Study 1 finds that team members have, on average, higher perceptions of their teammates’ trustworthiness when workload in the team is equitably shared and not imbalanced. Furthermore, it suggests that team workload sharing provides a way to ameliorate a lack of trust in low conscientious teammates. That is, team workload sharing moderates the link between trustee conscientiousness and perceived trustworthiness: in teams with high levels of workload sharing, less conscientious trustees are judged to be as trustworthy as their more conscientious peers. Study 2 replicates these findings and, unlike Study 1, it provides a clear main effect of trustee conscientiousness on perceived trustworthiness, and it reveals differences in the magnitude of the hypothesized effects at different periods of a team’s existence and for different dimensions of perceived trustworthiness. We conclude by suggesting strategies that can increase perceptions of trustworthiness within firms by using team processes that promote trustworthy behaviors.
期刊介绍:
Group & Organization Management (GOM) publishes the work of scholars and professionals who extend management and organization theory and address the implications of this for practitioners. Innovation, conceptual sophistication, methodological rigor, and cutting-edge scholarship are the driving principles. Topics include teams, group processes, leadership, organizational behavior, organizational theory, strategic management, organizational communication, gender and diversity, cross-cultural analysis, and organizational development and change, but all articles dealing with individual, group, organizational and/or environmental dimensions are appropriate.