The European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) and the limits to effective judicial protection in European Union law

Abstract

The principle of effective judicial protection is a cornerstone of EU law which is predicated on the existence of a complete system of judicial remedies. However, with the expansion of the operational powers of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) and the consequent fundamental rights concerns, this article challenges the assumption that the EU is based on such a complete system of remedies. By critically reviewing the judicial actions against Frontex before the Court of Justice, this article illustrates the limits to effective judicial protection for migrants attempting to enter the EU. It will be argued that the lack of an effective remedy suggests a violation of the right to good administration. Therefore, this article explores the potential of the bond between judicial protection and good administration to fix the loopholes within the emerging system of shared administration, in which EU agencies progressively interact with national competent authorities.